Henry A Crouch-Smith, Iain Feeley, Margaret K Lee, Nicholas Carleton-Bland, Simon Clark, Matthew Wilby
{"title":"腰椎减压手术治疗马尾综合征:非工作时间手术安全性的荟萃分析和系统评价。","authors":"Henry A Crouch-Smith, Iain Feeley, Margaret K Lee, Nicholas Carleton-Bland, Simon Clark, Matthew Wilby","doi":"10.1016/j.surge.2025.08.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of the published literature regarding the impact of performing lumbar decompression for cauda equina syndrome (CES) out of hours compared to regular operating hours.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A search of databases including Medline, EMBASE and Cochrane Library was performed with two independent reviewers per the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. A senior author arbitrated in event of disagreement. MeSH terms [((cauda equina) OR (CES)) AND ((hours) OR OOH)] were used. Filters including date range (from January 01, 1990 to November 01, 2022) and the English language were applied. Inclusion criteria consisted of retrospective or prospective cohort studies, English or full translation available, surgical complication as primary or secondary outcome and out of hours surgery as an independent variable. Case reports and studies without complication frequency were excluded. There were no additional studies identified through a snowballing secondary search through references of identified articles. Operative metrics were compiled into ad-hoc tables. Statistical analysis was performed using RevMan 5.4. A difference in complication rates with a P value of < .05 was deemed statistically significant. Heterogeneity was reported using I<sup>2</sup>. Study quality was assessed using the Newcastle Ottawa Score (NOS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The search strategy yielded 363 articles. After duplicate removal and application of inclusion/exclusion criteria, 15 studies were sought for retrieval and full text review. Of these, 5 studies were included for qualitative synthesis. Of these, 4 studies underwent quantitative analysis with 581 datasets. Meta-analysis was undertaken on 3 studies comprising 495 datasets. A dichotomous outcome was modelled using the Mantel-Haenszel statistical method with fixed effect which demonstrated an odds ratio (OR) of 2.38 (95 % CI 1.39-4.07) for sustaining an adverse event from out of hours surgery compared to routine operative hours. I<sup>2</sup> = 12 %, suggesting homogeneity between studies analysed.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study provides clinical evidence that out of hours surgery for lumbar decompression for CES is associated with a higher rate of surgical complications. The spinal surgeon should appropriately counsel the patient with CES that while it is important to do the surgery as soon as possible, operating out of hours carries a higher risk of surgical complications.</p>","PeriodicalId":49463,"journal":{"name":"Surgeon-Journal of the Royal Colleges of Surgeons of Edinburgh and Ireland","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Lumbar decompression surgery for cauda equina syndrome: A meta-analysis and systematic review of the safety of operating out of hours.\",\"authors\":\"Henry A Crouch-Smith, Iain Feeley, Margaret K Lee, Nicholas Carleton-Bland, Simon Clark, Matthew Wilby\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.surge.2025.08.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of the published literature regarding the impact of performing lumbar decompression for cauda equina syndrome (CES) out of hours compared to regular operating hours.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A search of databases including Medline, EMBASE and Cochrane Library was performed with two independent reviewers per the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. A senior author arbitrated in event of disagreement. MeSH terms [((cauda equina) OR (CES)) AND ((hours) OR OOH)] were used. Filters including date range (from January 01, 1990 to November 01, 2022) and the English language were applied. Inclusion criteria consisted of retrospective or prospective cohort studies, English or full translation available, surgical complication as primary or secondary outcome and out of hours surgery as an independent variable. Case reports and studies without complication frequency were excluded. There were no additional studies identified through a snowballing secondary search through references of identified articles. Operative metrics were compiled into ad-hoc tables. Statistical analysis was performed using RevMan 5.4. A difference in complication rates with a P value of < .05 was deemed statistically significant. Heterogeneity was reported using I<sup>2</sup>. Study quality was assessed using the Newcastle Ottawa Score (NOS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The search strategy yielded 363 articles. After duplicate removal and application of inclusion/exclusion criteria, 15 studies were sought for retrieval and full text review. Of these, 5 studies were included for qualitative synthesis. Of these, 4 studies underwent quantitative analysis with 581 datasets. Meta-analysis was undertaken on 3 studies comprising 495 datasets. A dichotomous outcome was modelled using the Mantel-Haenszel statistical method with fixed effect which demonstrated an odds ratio (OR) of 2.38 (95 % CI 1.39-4.07) for sustaining an adverse event from out of hours surgery compared to routine operative hours. I<sup>2</sup> = 12 %, suggesting homogeneity between studies analysed.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study provides clinical evidence that out of hours surgery for lumbar decompression for CES is associated with a higher rate of surgical complications. The spinal surgeon should appropriately counsel the patient with CES that while it is important to do the surgery as soon as possible, operating out of hours carries a higher risk of surgical complications.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49463,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Surgeon-Journal of the Royal Colleges of Surgeons of Edinburgh and Ireland\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Surgeon-Journal of the Royal Colleges of Surgeons of Edinburgh and Ireland\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surge.2025.08.003\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgeon-Journal of the Royal Colleges of Surgeons of Edinburgh and Ireland","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surge.2025.08.003","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:我们对已发表的文献进行了系统回顾和荟萃分析,这些文献是关于在非工作时间进行马尾综合征(CES)腰椎减压手术与常规手术时间相比的影响。方法:根据系统评价和荟萃分析(PRISMA)指南,由两名独立审稿人对Medline、EMBASE和Cochrane Library等数据库进行检索。一位资深作家在意见不合的情况下进行仲裁。使用MeSH术语[((马尾)或(CES))和((小时)或OOH)]。过滤器包括日期范围(从1990年1月1日到2022年11月1日)和英语语言。纳入标准包括回顾性或前瞻性队列研究,可提供英文或完整翻译,手术并发症作为主要或次要结局,非工作时间手术作为独立变量。排除无并发症发生率的病例报告和研究。通过对已确定文章的参考文献进行滚雪球式的二次检索,没有发现其他研究。操作指标被编译成特别的表格。采用RevMan 5.4进行统计分析。并发症发生率的差异P值为2。采用纽卡斯尔渥太华评分(NOS)评估研究质量。结果:搜索策略产生了363篇文章。在删除重复并应用纳入/排除标准后,我们检索了15项研究并对其全文进行了回顾。其中5项研究纳入定性综合。其中,4项研究对581个数据集进行了定量分析。对包含495个数据集的3项研究进行了荟萃分析。采用固定效应的Mantel-Haenszel统计方法对二分类结果进行建模,结果表明,与常规手术时间相比,非工作时间手术发生不良事件的优势比(OR)为2.38 (95% CI 1.39-4.07)。I2 = 12%,表明所分析的研究之间存在同质性。结论:本研究提供了临床证据,证明非手术时间腰椎减压治疗CES与较高的手术并发症发生率相关。脊柱外科医生应适当地告知患有CES的患者,尽管尽快进行手术很重要,但在几个小时之外进行手术会带来更高的手术并发症风险。
Lumbar decompression surgery for cauda equina syndrome: A meta-analysis and systematic review of the safety of operating out of hours.
Objectives: We conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of the published literature regarding the impact of performing lumbar decompression for cauda equina syndrome (CES) out of hours compared to regular operating hours.
Methods: A search of databases including Medline, EMBASE and Cochrane Library was performed with two independent reviewers per the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. A senior author arbitrated in event of disagreement. MeSH terms [((cauda equina) OR (CES)) AND ((hours) OR OOH)] were used. Filters including date range (from January 01, 1990 to November 01, 2022) and the English language were applied. Inclusion criteria consisted of retrospective or prospective cohort studies, English or full translation available, surgical complication as primary or secondary outcome and out of hours surgery as an independent variable. Case reports and studies without complication frequency were excluded. There were no additional studies identified through a snowballing secondary search through references of identified articles. Operative metrics were compiled into ad-hoc tables. Statistical analysis was performed using RevMan 5.4. A difference in complication rates with a P value of < .05 was deemed statistically significant. Heterogeneity was reported using I2. Study quality was assessed using the Newcastle Ottawa Score (NOS).
Results: The search strategy yielded 363 articles. After duplicate removal and application of inclusion/exclusion criteria, 15 studies were sought for retrieval and full text review. Of these, 5 studies were included for qualitative synthesis. Of these, 4 studies underwent quantitative analysis with 581 datasets. Meta-analysis was undertaken on 3 studies comprising 495 datasets. A dichotomous outcome was modelled using the Mantel-Haenszel statistical method with fixed effect which demonstrated an odds ratio (OR) of 2.38 (95 % CI 1.39-4.07) for sustaining an adverse event from out of hours surgery compared to routine operative hours. I2 = 12 %, suggesting homogeneity between studies analysed.
Conclusions: This study provides clinical evidence that out of hours surgery for lumbar decompression for CES is associated with a higher rate of surgical complications. The spinal surgeon should appropriately counsel the patient with CES that while it is important to do the surgery as soon as possible, operating out of hours carries a higher risk of surgical complications.
期刊介绍:
Since its establishment in 2003, The Surgeon has established itself as one of the leading multidisciplinary surgical titles, both in print and online. The Surgeon is published for the worldwide surgical and dental communities. The goal of the Journal is to achieve wider national and international recognition, through a commitment to excellence in original research. In addition, both Colleges see the Journal as an important educational service, and consequently there is a particular focus on post-graduate development. Much of our educational role will continue to be achieved through publishing expanded review articles by leaders in their field.
Articles in related areas to surgery and dentistry, such as healthcare management and education, are also welcomed. We aim to educate, entertain, give insight into new surgical techniques and technology, and provide a forum for debate and discussion.