Bilal Chughtai, Jennifer Polo, Ingrid Perscky, Ruben Urena, Adam Kadlec, Dean Elterman
{"title":"首次使用FloStent治疗BPH继发的导管依赖性尿潴留:来自RAPID I研究的额外结果","authors":"Bilal Chughtai, Jennifer Polo, Ingrid Perscky, Ruben Urena, Adam Kadlec, Dean Elterman","doi":"10.1016/j.urology.2025.09.018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To describe the performance of the FloStent in men with catheter-dependent urinary retention due benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) awaiting transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP). The FloStent is a novel device for treatment of BPH, that can be implanted and retrieved with any flexible cystoscope.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The RAPID I study was a first-in-human clinical trial designed to evaluate the clinical performance of the FloStent. One arm of the study treated men with lower urinary tract symptoms. In a separate and distinct arm of the study, reported here, 11 men with BPH-related urinary retention and indwelling catheters were enrolled and scheduled for FloStent implantation. All underwent outpatient device placement. Follow-up visits occurred at 2, 6, and 12weeks, after which the device was removed, and subjects underwent TURP as previously indicated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All 11 participants achieved catheter-free status immediately postprocedure. Baseline characteristics included mean age 69.0years, prostate size 65.3 mL, prostate-specific antigen 8.3ng/mL, serum creatinine 1.0mg/dL, and prostatic urethral length 3.4 cm. At 3months, 8 of 11 (72.7%) remained catheter-free. Among those, mean International Prostate Symptom Score was 6.4 ± 6.6, Quality of Life score 0.75 ± 1.75, Qmax 9.5 ± 4.8mL/s, and postvoid residual 105.4 ± 265.1 mL. Pain scores were uniformly 0 across all timepoints. Seven adverse events occurred in five subjects, all nonserious and self-limited.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>FloStent enabled catheter-free voiding in the majority of subjects, with excellent tolerability. This approach may offer an effective interim solution for patients awaiting TURP.</p>","PeriodicalId":23415,"journal":{"name":"Urology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"First Use of the FloStent for Catheter-Dependent Urinary Retention Secondary to Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: Additional Results From the RAPID I Study.\",\"authors\":\"Bilal Chughtai, Jennifer Polo, Ingrid Perscky, Ruben Urena, Adam Kadlec, Dean Elterman\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.urology.2025.09.018\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To describe the performance of the FloStent in men with catheter-dependent urinary retention due benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) awaiting transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP). The FloStent is a novel device for treatment of BPH, that can be implanted and retrieved with any flexible cystoscope.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The RAPID I study was a first-in-human clinical trial designed to evaluate the clinical performance of the FloStent. One arm of the study treated men with lower urinary tract symptoms. In a separate and distinct arm of the study, reported here, 11 men with BPH-related urinary retention and indwelling catheters were enrolled and scheduled for FloStent implantation. All underwent outpatient device placement. Follow-up visits occurred at 2, 6, and 12weeks, after which the device was removed, and subjects underwent TURP as previously indicated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All 11 participants achieved catheter-free status immediately postprocedure. Baseline characteristics included mean age 69.0years, prostate size 65.3 mL, prostate-specific antigen 8.3ng/mL, serum creatinine 1.0mg/dL, and prostatic urethral length 3.4 cm. At 3months, 8 of 11 (72.7%) remained catheter-free. Among those, mean International Prostate Symptom Score was 6.4 ± 6.6, Quality of Life score 0.75 ± 1.75, Qmax 9.5 ± 4.8mL/s, and postvoid residual 105.4 ± 265.1 mL. Pain scores were uniformly 0 across all timepoints. Seven adverse events occurred in five subjects, all nonserious and self-limited.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>FloStent enabled catheter-free voiding in the majority of subjects, with excellent tolerability. This approach may offer an effective interim solution for patients awaiting TURP.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23415,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Urology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Urology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2025.09.018\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2025.09.018","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
First Use of the FloStent for Catheter-Dependent Urinary Retention Secondary to Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: Additional Results From the RAPID I Study.
Objective: To describe the performance of the FloStent in men with catheter-dependent urinary retention due benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) awaiting transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP). The FloStent is a novel device for treatment of BPH, that can be implanted and retrieved with any flexible cystoscope.
Methods: The RAPID I study was a first-in-human clinical trial designed to evaluate the clinical performance of the FloStent. One arm of the study treated men with lower urinary tract symptoms. In a separate and distinct arm of the study, reported here, 11 men with BPH-related urinary retention and indwelling catheters were enrolled and scheduled for FloStent implantation. All underwent outpatient device placement. Follow-up visits occurred at 2, 6, and 12weeks, after which the device was removed, and subjects underwent TURP as previously indicated.
Results: All 11 participants achieved catheter-free status immediately postprocedure. Baseline characteristics included mean age 69.0years, prostate size 65.3 mL, prostate-specific antigen 8.3ng/mL, serum creatinine 1.0mg/dL, and prostatic urethral length 3.4 cm. At 3months, 8 of 11 (72.7%) remained catheter-free. Among those, mean International Prostate Symptom Score was 6.4 ± 6.6, Quality of Life score 0.75 ± 1.75, Qmax 9.5 ± 4.8mL/s, and postvoid residual 105.4 ± 265.1 mL. Pain scores were uniformly 0 across all timepoints. Seven adverse events occurred in five subjects, all nonserious and self-limited.
Conclusion: FloStent enabled catheter-free voiding in the majority of subjects, with excellent tolerability. This approach may offer an effective interim solution for patients awaiting TURP.
期刊介绍:
Urology is a monthly, peer–reviewed journal primarily for urologists, residents, interns, nephrologists, and other specialists interested in urology
The mission of Urology®, the "Gold Journal," is to provide practical, timely, and relevant clinical and basic science information to physicians and researchers practicing the art of urology worldwide. Urology® publishes original articles relating to adult and pediatric clinical urology as well as to clinical and basic science research. Topics in Urology® include pediatrics, surgical oncology, radiology, pathology, erectile dysfunction, infertility, incontinence, transplantation, endourology, andrology, female urology, reconstructive surgery, and medical oncology, as well as relevant basic science issues. Special features include rapid communication of important timely issues, surgeon''s workshops, interesting case reports, surgical techniques, clinical and basic science review articles, guest editorials, letters to the editor, book reviews, and historical articles in urology.