透明矫正器正畸治疗:一项国际修正德尔菲共识研究。

IF 3 2区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Niki Arveda, Marta Calza, Tommaso Castroflorio, Francesco Garino, Aldo Giancotti, Juan Carlos Varela, Calogero Dolce, Bjorn Ludwig, Paolo Manzo, Ravindra Nanda, Oliverio Teresa, Angela Arreghini, Francesca Cremonini, Davide Mirabella, Filippo Pepe, Chris Laspos, Robert L Boyd, Gina Theodoridis, Carlos Flores Mir, Teresa Pinho, Susana Palma, Jörg Schwarze, Kenji Ojima, Vicki Vlaskalic, Manuel Roman, Ute Schneider Moser, Mauro Cozzani, Mercedes Revenaz, Riccardo Riatti, Gianluigi Fiorillo, Sandra Tai, Andre El Zoghbi, Camilla Molinari, Enzo Pasciuti, Vincenzo D'Anto, Luca Lombardo, Giuseppe Siciliani
{"title":"透明矫正器正畸治疗:一项国际修正德尔菲共识研究。","authors":"Niki Arveda, Marta Calza, Tommaso Castroflorio, Francesco Garino, Aldo Giancotti, Juan Carlos Varela, Calogero Dolce, Bjorn Ludwig, Paolo Manzo, Ravindra Nanda, Oliverio Teresa, Angela Arreghini, Francesca Cremonini, Davide Mirabella, Filippo Pepe, Chris Laspos, Robert L Boyd, Gina Theodoridis, Carlos Flores Mir, Teresa Pinho, Susana Palma, Jörg Schwarze, Kenji Ojima, Vicki Vlaskalic, Manuel Roman, Ute Schneider Moser, Mauro Cozzani, Mercedes Revenaz, Riccardo Riatti, Gianluigi Fiorillo, Sandra Tai, Andre El Zoghbi, Camilla Molinari, Enzo Pasciuti, Vincenzo D'Anto, Luca Lombardo, Giuseppe Siciliani","doi":"10.1016/j.ajodo.2025.07.012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This study aimed to establish a consensus, thanks to the participation of a large group of experts in the field of aligner therapy, on several of its clinical and extraclinical aspects, with particular reference to its potential and biomechanical limitations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A Delphi study was conducted in 3 rounds. On the basis of the most recent systematic reviews in the literature, the steering committee formulated 35 questions. A group of 36 international experts agreed to participate in the survey and were asked to respond to the questions, choosing their level of agreement on a scale of 1-5 in the first round, then from 1 to 3 in the second, and finally with a yes or no response in the third, progressively narrowing the field of research. The items for which consensus (≥70%) was obtained were accepted; the others were reformulated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>On the basis of the analysis of the experts' responses, 68 questions were reformulated for the second round and 28 for the third round. After 3 rounds, the study generated 47 consensus statements regarding biomechanical aspects and extraclinical factors.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The study, based on the modified Delphi method, collected the opinion of experts, comparing it with the scientific literature to evaluate the potential and limitations of orthodontic aligners, obtaining 47 consensus statements related to biomechanics and extraclinical factors.</p>","PeriodicalId":50806,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clear aligner orthodontic treatment: An international modified Delphi consensus study.\",\"authors\":\"Niki Arveda, Marta Calza, Tommaso Castroflorio, Francesco Garino, Aldo Giancotti, Juan Carlos Varela, Calogero Dolce, Bjorn Ludwig, Paolo Manzo, Ravindra Nanda, Oliverio Teresa, Angela Arreghini, Francesca Cremonini, Davide Mirabella, Filippo Pepe, Chris Laspos, Robert L Boyd, Gina Theodoridis, Carlos Flores Mir, Teresa Pinho, Susana Palma, Jörg Schwarze, Kenji Ojima, Vicki Vlaskalic, Manuel Roman, Ute Schneider Moser, Mauro Cozzani, Mercedes Revenaz, Riccardo Riatti, Gianluigi Fiorillo, Sandra Tai, Andre El Zoghbi, Camilla Molinari, Enzo Pasciuti, Vincenzo D'Anto, Luca Lombardo, Giuseppe Siciliani\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ajodo.2025.07.012\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This study aimed to establish a consensus, thanks to the participation of a large group of experts in the field of aligner therapy, on several of its clinical and extraclinical aspects, with particular reference to its potential and biomechanical limitations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A Delphi study was conducted in 3 rounds. On the basis of the most recent systematic reviews in the literature, the steering committee formulated 35 questions. A group of 36 international experts agreed to participate in the survey and were asked to respond to the questions, choosing their level of agreement on a scale of 1-5 in the first round, then from 1 to 3 in the second, and finally with a yes or no response in the third, progressively narrowing the field of research. The items for which consensus (≥70%) was obtained were accepted; the others were reformulated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>On the basis of the analysis of the experts' responses, 68 questions were reformulated for the second round and 28 for the third round. After 3 rounds, the study generated 47 consensus statements regarding biomechanical aspects and extraclinical factors.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The study, based on the modified Delphi method, collected the opinion of experts, comparing it with the scientific literature to evaluate the potential and limitations of orthodontic aligners, obtaining 47 consensus statements related to biomechanics and extraclinical factors.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50806,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2025.07.012\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2025.07.012","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:这项研究的目的是建立一个共识,感谢一大批专家在对准器治疗领域的参与,在其临床和临床外的几个方面,特别是参考其潜力和生物力学的局限性。方法:采用德尔菲法进行3轮调查。在文献中最新系统综述的基础上,指导委员会制定了35个问题。一组36名国际专家同意参与调查,并被要求回答问题,在第一轮中选择他们的同意程度为1-5分,然后在第二轮中从1到3分,最后在第三轮中选择“是”或“否”,逐步缩小研究领域。获得一致意见(≥70%)的项目被接受;其他的都被重新制定了。结果:在对专家回答进行分析的基础上,第二轮重新制定了68个问题,第三轮重新制定了28个问题。经过三轮研究,产生了47项关于生物力学方面和临床外因素的共识声明。结论:本研究基于改进的德尔菲法,收集专家意见,并与科学文献进行比较,评价正畸矫正器的潜力和局限性,获得47条与生物力学和临床外因素相关的共识陈述。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Clear aligner orthodontic treatment: An international modified Delphi consensus study.

Introduction: This study aimed to establish a consensus, thanks to the participation of a large group of experts in the field of aligner therapy, on several of its clinical and extraclinical aspects, with particular reference to its potential and biomechanical limitations.

Methods: A Delphi study was conducted in 3 rounds. On the basis of the most recent systematic reviews in the literature, the steering committee formulated 35 questions. A group of 36 international experts agreed to participate in the survey and were asked to respond to the questions, choosing their level of agreement on a scale of 1-5 in the first round, then from 1 to 3 in the second, and finally with a yes or no response in the third, progressively narrowing the field of research. The items for which consensus (≥70%) was obtained were accepted; the others were reformulated.

Results: On the basis of the analysis of the experts' responses, 68 questions were reformulated for the second round and 28 for the third round. After 3 rounds, the study generated 47 consensus statements regarding biomechanical aspects and extraclinical factors.

Conclusions: The study, based on the modified Delphi method, collected the opinion of experts, comparing it with the scientific literature to evaluate the potential and limitations of orthodontic aligners, obtaining 47 consensus statements related to biomechanics and extraclinical factors.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
13.30%
发文量
432
审稿时长
66 days
期刊介绍: Published for more than 100 years, the American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics remains the leading orthodontic resource. It is the official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, the American Board of Orthodontics, and the College of Diplomates of the American Board of Orthodontics. Each month its readers have access to original peer-reviewed articles that examine all phases of orthodontic treatment. Illustrated throughout, the publication includes tables, color photographs, and statistical data. Coverage includes successful diagnostic procedures, imaging techniques, bracket and archwire materials, extraction and impaction concerns, orthognathic surgery, TMJ disorders, removable appliances, and adult therapy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信