Niki Arveda, Marta Calza, Tommaso Castroflorio, Francesco Garino, Aldo Giancotti, Juan Carlos Varela, Calogero Dolce, Bjorn Ludwig, Paolo Manzo, Ravindra Nanda, Oliverio Teresa, Angela Arreghini, Francesca Cremonini, Davide Mirabella, Filippo Pepe, Chris Laspos, Robert L Boyd, Gina Theodoridis, Carlos Flores Mir, Teresa Pinho, Susana Palma, Jörg Schwarze, Kenji Ojima, Vicki Vlaskalic, Manuel Roman, Ute Schneider Moser, Mauro Cozzani, Mercedes Revenaz, Riccardo Riatti, Gianluigi Fiorillo, Sandra Tai, Andre El Zoghbi, Camilla Molinari, Enzo Pasciuti, Vincenzo D'Anto, Luca Lombardo, Giuseppe Siciliani
{"title":"透明矫正器正畸治疗:一项国际修正德尔菲共识研究。","authors":"Niki Arveda, Marta Calza, Tommaso Castroflorio, Francesco Garino, Aldo Giancotti, Juan Carlos Varela, Calogero Dolce, Bjorn Ludwig, Paolo Manzo, Ravindra Nanda, Oliverio Teresa, Angela Arreghini, Francesca Cremonini, Davide Mirabella, Filippo Pepe, Chris Laspos, Robert L Boyd, Gina Theodoridis, Carlos Flores Mir, Teresa Pinho, Susana Palma, Jörg Schwarze, Kenji Ojima, Vicki Vlaskalic, Manuel Roman, Ute Schneider Moser, Mauro Cozzani, Mercedes Revenaz, Riccardo Riatti, Gianluigi Fiorillo, Sandra Tai, Andre El Zoghbi, Camilla Molinari, Enzo Pasciuti, Vincenzo D'Anto, Luca Lombardo, Giuseppe Siciliani","doi":"10.1016/j.ajodo.2025.07.012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This study aimed to establish a consensus, thanks to the participation of a large group of experts in the field of aligner therapy, on several of its clinical and extraclinical aspects, with particular reference to its potential and biomechanical limitations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A Delphi study was conducted in 3 rounds. On the basis of the most recent systematic reviews in the literature, the steering committee formulated 35 questions. A group of 36 international experts agreed to participate in the survey and were asked to respond to the questions, choosing their level of agreement on a scale of 1-5 in the first round, then from 1 to 3 in the second, and finally with a yes or no response in the third, progressively narrowing the field of research. The items for which consensus (≥70%) was obtained were accepted; the others were reformulated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>On the basis of the analysis of the experts' responses, 68 questions were reformulated for the second round and 28 for the third round. After 3 rounds, the study generated 47 consensus statements regarding biomechanical aspects and extraclinical factors.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The study, based on the modified Delphi method, collected the opinion of experts, comparing it with the scientific literature to evaluate the potential and limitations of orthodontic aligners, obtaining 47 consensus statements related to biomechanics and extraclinical factors.</p>","PeriodicalId":50806,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clear aligner orthodontic treatment: An international modified Delphi consensus study.\",\"authors\":\"Niki Arveda, Marta Calza, Tommaso Castroflorio, Francesco Garino, Aldo Giancotti, Juan Carlos Varela, Calogero Dolce, Bjorn Ludwig, Paolo Manzo, Ravindra Nanda, Oliverio Teresa, Angela Arreghini, Francesca Cremonini, Davide Mirabella, Filippo Pepe, Chris Laspos, Robert L Boyd, Gina Theodoridis, Carlos Flores Mir, Teresa Pinho, Susana Palma, Jörg Schwarze, Kenji Ojima, Vicki Vlaskalic, Manuel Roman, Ute Schneider Moser, Mauro Cozzani, Mercedes Revenaz, Riccardo Riatti, Gianluigi Fiorillo, Sandra Tai, Andre El Zoghbi, Camilla Molinari, Enzo Pasciuti, Vincenzo D'Anto, Luca Lombardo, Giuseppe Siciliani\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ajodo.2025.07.012\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This study aimed to establish a consensus, thanks to the participation of a large group of experts in the field of aligner therapy, on several of its clinical and extraclinical aspects, with particular reference to its potential and biomechanical limitations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A Delphi study was conducted in 3 rounds. On the basis of the most recent systematic reviews in the literature, the steering committee formulated 35 questions. A group of 36 international experts agreed to participate in the survey and were asked to respond to the questions, choosing their level of agreement on a scale of 1-5 in the first round, then from 1 to 3 in the second, and finally with a yes or no response in the third, progressively narrowing the field of research. The items for which consensus (≥70%) was obtained were accepted; the others were reformulated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>On the basis of the analysis of the experts' responses, 68 questions were reformulated for the second round and 28 for the third round. After 3 rounds, the study generated 47 consensus statements regarding biomechanical aspects and extraclinical factors.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The study, based on the modified Delphi method, collected the opinion of experts, comparing it with the scientific literature to evaluate the potential and limitations of orthodontic aligners, obtaining 47 consensus statements related to biomechanics and extraclinical factors.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50806,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2025.07.012\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2025.07.012","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Clear aligner orthodontic treatment: An international modified Delphi consensus study.
Introduction: This study aimed to establish a consensus, thanks to the participation of a large group of experts in the field of aligner therapy, on several of its clinical and extraclinical aspects, with particular reference to its potential and biomechanical limitations.
Methods: A Delphi study was conducted in 3 rounds. On the basis of the most recent systematic reviews in the literature, the steering committee formulated 35 questions. A group of 36 international experts agreed to participate in the survey and were asked to respond to the questions, choosing their level of agreement on a scale of 1-5 in the first round, then from 1 to 3 in the second, and finally with a yes or no response in the third, progressively narrowing the field of research. The items for which consensus (≥70%) was obtained were accepted; the others were reformulated.
Results: On the basis of the analysis of the experts' responses, 68 questions were reformulated for the second round and 28 for the third round. After 3 rounds, the study generated 47 consensus statements regarding biomechanical aspects and extraclinical factors.
Conclusions: The study, based on the modified Delphi method, collected the opinion of experts, comparing it with the scientific literature to evaluate the potential and limitations of orthodontic aligners, obtaining 47 consensus statements related to biomechanics and extraclinical factors.
期刊介绍:
Published for more than 100 years, the American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics remains the leading orthodontic resource. It is the official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, the American Board of Orthodontics, and the College of Diplomates of the American Board of Orthodontics. Each month its readers have access to original peer-reviewed articles that examine all phases of orthodontic treatment. Illustrated throughout, the publication includes tables, color photographs, and statistical data. Coverage includes successful diagnostic procedures, imaging techniques, bracket and archwire materials, extraction and impaction concerns, orthognathic surgery, TMJ disorders, removable appliances, and adult therapy.