致编辑:可解释的机器学习模型预测机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术后1年腹股沟疝风险。

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Sana Iftikhar, Ahmad Furqan Anjum
{"title":"致编辑:可解释的机器学习模型预测机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术后1年腹股沟疝风险。","authors":"Sana Iftikhar, Ahmad Furqan Anjum","doi":"10.1007/s11701-025-02801-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We read with interest the recent article by Yu et al., \"Interpretable machine learning model predicts 1-year inguinal hernia risk after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy\" (DOI: 10.1007/s11701-025-02723-5) , which represents an important step in applying explainable machine learning to postoperative complication prediction. The authors should be commended for highlighting inguinal hernia as an underrecognized sequela of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy and for pioneering the use of SHAP-based interpretation in this context. Their findings offer valuable groundwork for risk stratification and personalized counseling. While the study acknowledges several limitations, we wish to highlight additional concerns that warrant consideration. First, the reliance on a single, ethnically homogeneous cohort may limit generalizability across diverse populations. Second, omission of intraoperative surgical technique variables-such as Retzius-sparing approaches, peritoneal closure, or extraperitoneal access-restricts the model's ability to account for modifiable surgical factors. Third, the use of symptom-driven ultrasonography risks underdetection of subclinical hernias, introducing potential bias. Fourth, the one-year follow-up period may underestimate true incidence, as many cases manifest within 2-3 years postoperatively. Finally, the feature set was confined to five predictors, overlooking biological and functional variables such as collagen metabolism, frailty indices, and continence recovery, which are known to influence hernia development.We suggest that future research incorporate multicenter, ethnically diverse cohorts, longer follow-up, standardized imaging, and expanded biological and surgical predictors. These steps will enhance predictive accuracy, clinical utility, and generalizability. Our critique aims to complement the authors' contribution and foster refinement of machine learning models for postoperative complication risk prediction.</p>","PeriodicalId":47616,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Robotic Surgery","volume":"19 1","pages":"620"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Letter to the editor: interpretable machine learning model predicts 1‑year inguinal hernia risk after robot‑assisted radical prostatectomy.\",\"authors\":\"Sana Iftikhar, Ahmad Furqan Anjum\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11701-025-02801-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>We read with interest the recent article by Yu et al., \\\"Interpretable machine learning model predicts 1-year inguinal hernia risk after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy\\\" (DOI: 10.1007/s11701-025-02723-5) , which represents an important step in applying explainable machine learning to postoperative complication prediction. The authors should be commended for highlighting inguinal hernia as an underrecognized sequela of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy and for pioneering the use of SHAP-based interpretation in this context. Their findings offer valuable groundwork for risk stratification and personalized counseling. While the study acknowledges several limitations, we wish to highlight additional concerns that warrant consideration. First, the reliance on a single, ethnically homogeneous cohort may limit generalizability across diverse populations. Second, omission of intraoperative surgical technique variables-such as Retzius-sparing approaches, peritoneal closure, or extraperitoneal access-restricts the model's ability to account for modifiable surgical factors. Third, the use of symptom-driven ultrasonography risks underdetection of subclinical hernias, introducing potential bias. Fourth, the one-year follow-up period may underestimate true incidence, as many cases manifest within 2-3 years postoperatively. Finally, the feature set was confined to five predictors, overlooking biological and functional variables such as collagen metabolism, frailty indices, and continence recovery, which are known to influence hernia development.We suggest that future research incorporate multicenter, ethnically diverse cohorts, longer follow-up, standardized imaging, and expanded biological and surgical predictors. These steps will enhance predictive accuracy, clinical utility, and generalizability. Our critique aims to complement the authors' contribution and foster refinement of machine learning models for postoperative complication risk prediction.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47616,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Robotic Surgery\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"620\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Robotic Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-025-02801-8\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Robotic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-025-02801-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们饶有兴趣地阅读了Yu等人最近的一篇文章,“可解释的机器学习模型预测机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术后1年腹股沟疝风险”(DOI: 10.1007/s11701-025-02723-5),这是将可解释的机器学习应用于术后并发症预测的重要一步。作者强调腹股沟疝是机器人辅助根治性前列腺切除术的一种未被充分认识的后遗症,并在此背景下率先使用基于shap的解释,应该受到赞扬。他们的发现为风险分层和个性化咨询提供了有价值的基础。虽然这项研究承认有一些局限性,但我们希望强调值得考虑的其他问题。首先,对单一种族同质队列的依赖可能会限制在不同人群中的普遍性。其次,术中手术技术变量的遗漏——如保留retzius入路、腹膜闭合或腹膜外入路——限制了模型解释可修改手术因素的能力。第三,使用症状驱动型超声检查有漏检亚临床疝的风险,引入潜在的偏倚。第四,一年的随访期可能低估了真实发病率,因为许多病例在术后2-3年内出现。最后,特征集仅限于五个预测因素,忽略了生物和功能变量,如胶原代谢、脆弱指数和失禁恢复,这些已知会影响疝的发展。我们建议未来的研究纳入多中心、种族多样化的队列、更长的随访、标准化的成像和扩大的生物和外科预测指标。这些步骤将提高预测的准确性、临床实用性和普遍性。我们的评论旨在补充作者的贡献,并促进对术后并发症风险预测的机器学习模型的改进。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Letter to the editor: interpretable machine learning model predicts 1‑year inguinal hernia risk after robot‑assisted radical prostatectomy.

We read with interest the recent article by Yu et al., "Interpretable machine learning model predicts 1-year inguinal hernia risk after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy" (DOI: 10.1007/s11701-025-02723-5) , which represents an important step in applying explainable machine learning to postoperative complication prediction. The authors should be commended for highlighting inguinal hernia as an underrecognized sequela of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy and for pioneering the use of SHAP-based interpretation in this context. Their findings offer valuable groundwork for risk stratification and personalized counseling. While the study acknowledges several limitations, we wish to highlight additional concerns that warrant consideration. First, the reliance on a single, ethnically homogeneous cohort may limit generalizability across diverse populations. Second, omission of intraoperative surgical technique variables-such as Retzius-sparing approaches, peritoneal closure, or extraperitoneal access-restricts the model's ability to account for modifiable surgical factors. Third, the use of symptom-driven ultrasonography risks underdetection of subclinical hernias, introducing potential bias. Fourth, the one-year follow-up period may underestimate true incidence, as many cases manifest within 2-3 years postoperatively. Finally, the feature set was confined to five predictors, overlooking biological and functional variables such as collagen metabolism, frailty indices, and continence recovery, which are known to influence hernia development.We suggest that future research incorporate multicenter, ethnically diverse cohorts, longer follow-up, standardized imaging, and expanded biological and surgical predictors. These steps will enhance predictive accuracy, clinical utility, and generalizability. Our critique aims to complement the authors' contribution and foster refinement of machine learning models for postoperative complication risk prediction.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
8.70%
发文量
145
期刊介绍: The aim of the Journal of Robotic Surgery is to become the leading worldwide journal for publication of articles related to robotic surgery, encompassing surgical simulation and integrated imaging techniques. The journal provides a centralized, focused resource for physicians wishing to publish their experience or those wishing to avail themselves of the most up-to-date findings.The journal reports on advance in a wide range of surgical specialties including adult and pediatric urology, general surgery, cardiac surgery, gynecology, ENT, orthopedics and neurosurgery.The use of robotics in surgery is broad-based and will undoubtedly expand over the next decade as new technical innovations and techniques increase the applicability of its use. The journal intends to capture this trend as it develops.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信