Empathy, the scientific clinical gaze and contemporary practice: a critical reflection.

This review essay critically examines a modern manifestation of the scientific clinical gaze, drawing upon Michel Foucault's foundational concepts. Using a Swedish medical case involving cultural bias and delayed diagnosis, the essay questions the strengths and vulnerabilities of the clinical gaze, highlighting its susceptibility to subjective distortions despite aspirations toward scientific objectivity. It situates this analysis within broader critiques of the sociopolitical entanglement of medicine, emphasising how implicit bias, institutional norms and power structures continue to influence clinical practice. The discussion further integrates recent scholarship from narrative medicine, cultural competence and reflexivity studies to propose an enriched model of clinical engagement. By advocating for the incorporation of empathy, narrative competence and reflexive awareness into clinical training and practice, the essay outlines strategies to mitigate the epistemic violence historically associated with the clinical gaze. These recommendations aim to advance medical humanities scholarship, foster more equitable healthcare delivery and prepare future practitioners for ethically attuned and culturally sensitive patient care. Through this critical reflection, the essay contributes to ongoing debates regarding the rehumanisation of modern medicine.