初级保健跨学科疼痛康复前后的医疗保健利用和资源分配。

IF 1.9 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Scandinavian Journal of Pain Pub Date : 2025-09-15 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1515/sjpain-2025-0024
Katarina Eklund, Britt-Marie Stålnacke, Paul Enthoven, Magnus Zingmark, Gunilla Stenberg
{"title":"初级保健跨学科疼痛康复前后的医疗保健利用和资源分配。","authors":"Katarina Eklund, Britt-Marie Stålnacke, Paul Enthoven, Magnus Zingmark, Gunilla Stenberg","doi":"10.1515/sjpain-2025-0024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Most patients with chronic pain are identified and managed in primary care (PC). Chronic pain management is challenging, which is manifested by increased healthcare utilization (HCU) in this patient group. The interdisciplinary pain rehabilitation program (IPRP) is the gold standard treatment for patients with chronic pain but is scarcely used in PC. The aim of this study was to evaluate the HCU of patients with chronic pain in PC 1 year before and 1 year after an IPRP by examining the distribution of costs and resources.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study combined data from a national pain registry and HCU data from regional administrative registries, including 146 patients who participated in an IPRP in PC. The outcome measure was the number of outpatient healthcare contacts. Costs and the distribution of resources were compared across the two measurement intervals using paired <i>t</i>-tests. HCU costs were described from a healthcare provider perspective.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>HCU decreased by 16% in the year following IPRP compared to the year before. Costs for outpatient visits dropped by 12% or €434 per participant. Visits to physiotherapists and general practitioners decreased the most, by 31% (<i>p</i> = 0.048) and 23% (<i>p</i> < 0.001) respectively. Visits to nurses, occupational therapists, and psychologists/social workers in turn increased marginally (6%, 5% vs 10%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>IPRP in PC may lead to reduced HCU, freed resources, and streamlined chronic pain management. The study offers valuable insights into expected changes in HCU for chronic pain patients after an IPRP and how these changes may impact daily activities at the PC center.</p>","PeriodicalId":47407,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Pain","volume":"25 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Healthcare utilization and resource distribution before and after interdisciplinary pain rehabilitation in primary care.\",\"authors\":\"Katarina Eklund, Britt-Marie Stålnacke, Paul Enthoven, Magnus Zingmark, Gunilla Stenberg\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/sjpain-2025-0024\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Most patients with chronic pain are identified and managed in primary care (PC). Chronic pain management is challenging, which is manifested by increased healthcare utilization (HCU) in this patient group. The interdisciplinary pain rehabilitation program (IPRP) is the gold standard treatment for patients with chronic pain but is scarcely used in PC. The aim of this study was to evaluate the HCU of patients with chronic pain in PC 1 year before and 1 year after an IPRP by examining the distribution of costs and resources.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study combined data from a national pain registry and HCU data from regional administrative registries, including 146 patients who participated in an IPRP in PC. The outcome measure was the number of outpatient healthcare contacts. Costs and the distribution of resources were compared across the two measurement intervals using paired <i>t</i>-tests. HCU costs were described from a healthcare provider perspective.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>HCU decreased by 16% in the year following IPRP compared to the year before. Costs for outpatient visits dropped by 12% or €434 per participant. Visits to physiotherapists and general practitioners decreased the most, by 31% (<i>p</i> = 0.048) and 23% (<i>p</i> < 0.001) respectively. Visits to nurses, occupational therapists, and psychologists/social workers in turn increased marginally (6%, 5% vs 10%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>IPRP in PC may lead to reduced HCU, freed resources, and streamlined chronic pain management. The study offers valuable insights into expected changes in HCU for chronic pain patients after an IPRP and how these changes may impact daily activities at the PC center.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47407,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scandinavian Journal of Pain\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scandinavian Journal of Pain\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/sjpain-2025-0024\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Pain","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/sjpain-2025-0024","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:大多数慢性疼痛患者在初级保健(PC)中被识别和管理。慢性疼痛管理具有挑战性,这表现在该患者组中医疗保健利用率(HCU)的增加。跨学科疼痛康复计划(IPRP)是治疗慢性疼痛患者的金标准,但很少用于PC。本研究的目的是通过检查成本和资源的分配,评估慢性疼痛PC患者在IPRP术前和术后1年的HCU。方法:这项回顾性队列研究结合了来自国家疼痛登记处的数据和来自地区行政登记处的HCU数据,包括146名在PC参加IPRP的患者。结果测量是门诊医疗接触的次数。使用配对t检验比较两个测量区间的成本和资源分布。从医疗保健提供者的角度描述了HCU成本。结果:与前一年相比,IPRP后一年HCU下降了16%。门诊费用下降了12%,即每位参与者434欧元。对物理治疗师和全科医生的访问减少最多,分别减少了31% (p = 0.048)和23% (p < 0.001)。护士、职业治疗师和心理学家/社会工作者的就诊人数依次略有增加(6%,5% vs 10%)。结论:PC患者的IPRP可减少HCU,释放资源,简化慢性疼痛管理。该研究为IPRP后慢性疼痛患者HCU的预期变化以及这些变化如何影响PC中心的日常活动提供了有价值的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Healthcare utilization and resource distribution before and after interdisciplinary pain rehabilitation in primary care.

Objectives: Most patients with chronic pain are identified and managed in primary care (PC). Chronic pain management is challenging, which is manifested by increased healthcare utilization (HCU) in this patient group. The interdisciplinary pain rehabilitation program (IPRP) is the gold standard treatment for patients with chronic pain but is scarcely used in PC. The aim of this study was to evaluate the HCU of patients with chronic pain in PC 1 year before and 1 year after an IPRP by examining the distribution of costs and resources.

Methods: This retrospective cohort study combined data from a national pain registry and HCU data from regional administrative registries, including 146 patients who participated in an IPRP in PC. The outcome measure was the number of outpatient healthcare contacts. Costs and the distribution of resources were compared across the two measurement intervals using paired t-tests. HCU costs were described from a healthcare provider perspective.

Results: HCU decreased by 16% in the year following IPRP compared to the year before. Costs for outpatient visits dropped by 12% or €434 per participant. Visits to physiotherapists and general practitioners decreased the most, by 31% (p = 0.048) and 23% (p < 0.001) respectively. Visits to nurses, occupational therapists, and psychologists/social workers in turn increased marginally (6%, 5% vs 10%).

Conclusions: IPRP in PC may lead to reduced HCU, freed resources, and streamlined chronic pain management. The study offers valuable insights into expected changes in HCU for chronic pain patients after an IPRP and how these changes may impact daily activities at the PC center.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Scandinavian Journal of Pain
Scandinavian Journal of Pain CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
6.20%
发文量
73
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信