新冠肺炎免疫治疗的开发、实施、药代动力学和安全性评价:双盲随机安慰剂对照试验

Q4 Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
Guillermo Alberto Keller, Silvia Miranda, Adolfo Rafael De Roodt, Roxana Salvi, Ivana Colaianni, Elizabeth García, Guillermo Bramuglia, Leandro Calderón, Diego Mazza, Laura Lanari, Oscar Perez, Matias Fingermann, Guillermo Temprano, Guillermo Di Girolamo, Claudio Bonel, José Cristian Dokmetjian
{"title":"新冠肺炎免疫治疗的开发、实施、药代动力学和安全性评价:双盲随机安慰剂对照试验","authors":"Guillermo Alberto Keller, Silvia Miranda, Adolfo Rafael De Roodt, Roxana Salvi, Ivana Colaianni, Elizabeth García, Guillermo Bramuglia, Leandro Calderón, Diego Mazza, Laura Lanari, Oscar Perez, Matias Fingermann, Guillermo Temprano, Guillermo Di Girolamo, Claudio Bonel, José Cristian Dokmetjian","doi":"10.14712/23362936.2025.20","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Passive immunotherapy has been evaluated in many infections. The present study aims to evaluate purified F(ab')2 fraction of equine hyperimmune IgG (anti-SARS-CoV-2) in the treatment of coronavirus lung disease. Patients with coronavirus disease of 2019 (COVID-19) with World Health Organization (WHO) score 3, 4 or 5 up to 72 hours of evolution from the onset of symptoms were included. They were randomly assigned to anti-SARS-CoV-2 or placebo. Follow-up was performed for 28 days to assess efficacy, safety, pharmacokinetics, detection of anti-horse antibodies, circulating cytokines and determination of anti-SARS neutralizing activity. The 20 initial patients (44±14 years) were included. On the third day of treatment there was an improvement (P=0.02) in arterial saturation (95±1.6 vs. 93±2.5%) with increasing differences over time between treatments (day 8: 97±0.1 vs. 94±0.3%). The length of oxygen therapy treatment was 2±0.8 vs. 3±0.9 (0.048) in patients falling within WHO 5 category (no difference to WHO 4). Mean hospitalization was 13±2.5 vs. 14±0.8 days (P=0.095) and time to clinical improvement was 2±0.5 vs. 3±0.9 days (P=0.048) in patients with initial 5 WHO category, with no differences to patients who started with WHO stage 4. The time to nasal swab negativization was 10±2.1 vs. 12±0 day (P=0.015). No adverse reactions or intercurrences were detected. All patients presented heterophile antibodies without clinical correlate. The new treatment shows improvement in arterial saturation (days 3 to 12), and a decrease on detectable viral RNA (days 8 to 11) with good pharmacokinetic and safety profile.</p>","PeriodicalId":35490,"journal":{"name":"Prague medical report","volume":"126 3","pages":"121-138"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development, Implementation, Pharmacokinetic and Safety Evaluation of an Immunotherapeutic Treatment for COVID-19: Double-blind Randomized Placebo-controlled Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Guillermo Alberto Keller, Silvia Miranda, Adolfo Rafael De Roodt, Roxana Salvi, Ivana Colaianni, Elizabeth García, Guillermo Bramuglia, Leandro Calderón, Diego Mazza, Laura Lanari, Oscar Perez, Matias Fingermann, Guillermo Temprano, Guillermo Di Girolamo, Claudio Bonel, José Cristian Dokmetjian\",\"doi\":\"10.14712/23362936.2025.20\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Passive immunotherapy has been evaluated in many infections. The present study aims to evaluate purified F(ab')2 fraction of equine hyperimmune IgG (anti-SARS-CoV-2) in the treatment of coronavirus lung disease. Patients with coronavirus disease of 2019 (COVID-19) with World Health Organization (WHO) score 3, 4 or 5 up to 72 hours of evolution from the onset of symptoms were included. They were randomly assigned to anti-SARS-CoV-2 or placebo. Follow-up was performed for 28 days to assess efficacy, safety, pharmacokinetics, detection of anti-horse antibodies, circulating cytokines and determination of anti-SARS neutralizing activity. The 20 initial patients (44±14 years) were included. On the third day of treatment there was an improvement (P=0.02) in arterial saturation (95±1.6 vs. 93±2.5%) with increasing differences over time between treatments (day 8: 97±0.1 vs. 94±0.3%). The length of oxygen therapy treatment was 2±0.8 vs. 3±0.9 (0.048) in patients falling within WHO 5 category (no difference to WHO 4). Mean hospitalization was 13±2.5 vs. 14±0.8 days (P=0.095) and time to clinical improvement was 2±0.5 vs. 3±0.9 days (P=0.048) in patients with initial 5 WHO category, with no differences to patients who started with WHO stage 4. The time to nasal swab negativization was 10±2.1 vs. 12±0 day (P=0.015). No adverse reactions or intercurrences were detected. All patients presented heterophile antibodies without clinical correlate. The new treatment shows improvement in arterial saturation (days 3 to 12), and a decrease on detectable viral RNA (days 8 to 11) with good pharmacokinetic and safety profile.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":35490,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Prague medical report\",\"volume\":\"126 3\",\"pages\":\"121-138\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Prague medical report\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14712/23362936.2025.20\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prague medical report","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14712/23362936.2025.20","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

被动免疫疗法已被评估用于许多感染。本研究旨在评价纯化的马高免疫IgG(抗sars - cov -2) F(ab')2部分对冠状病毒肺部疾病的治疗作用。纳入了从症状出现到72小时内世界卫生组织评分为3、4或5分的2019年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)患者。他们被随机分配到抗sars - cov -2或安慰剂组。随访28天,评估疗效、安全性、药代动力学、检测抗马抗体、循环细胞因子和测定抗sars中和活性。纳入20例初始患者(44±14岁)。在治疗的第3天,动脉饱和度有改善(P=0.02)(95±1.6 vs. 93±2.5%),随着治疗时间的推移差异越来越大(第8天:97±0.1 vs. 94±0.3%)。WHO 5级患者的氧疗时间为2±0.8 vs. 3±0.9(0.048)(与WHO 4级无差异)。WHO初始5期患者的平均住院时间为13±2.5天比14±0.8天(P=0.095),临床改善时间为2±0.5天比3±0.9天(P=0.048),与WHO初始4期患者无差异。鼻拭子阴性时间分别为10±2.1天和12±0天(P=0.015)。未发现不良反应或并发症。所有患者均出现嗜异性抗体,无临床相关性。新疗法显示动脉饱和度改善(3 - 12天),可检测病毒RNA减少(8 - 11天),具有良好的药代动力学和安全性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Development, Implementation, Pharmacokinetic and Safety Evaluation of an Immunotherapeutic Treatment for COVID-19: Double-blind Randomized Placebo-controlled Trial.

Passive immunotherapy has been evaluated in many infections. The present study aims to evaluate purified F(ab')2 fraction of equine hyperimmune IgG (anti-SARS-CoV-2) in the treatment of coronavirus lung disease. Patients with coronavirus disease of 2019 (COVID-19) with World Health Organization (WHO) score 3, 4 or 5 up to 72 hours of evolution from the onset of symptoms were included. They were randomly assigned to anti-SARS-CoV-2 or placebo. Follow-up was performed for 28 days to assess efficacy, safety, pharmacokinetics, detection of anti-horse antibodies, circulating cytokines and determination of anti-SARS neutralizing activity. The 20 initial patients (44±14 years) were included. On the third day of treatment there was an improvement (P=0.02) in arterial saturation (95±1.6 vs. 93±2.5%) with increasing differences over time between treatments (day 8: 97±0.1 vs. 94±0.3%). The length of oxygen therapy treatment was 2±0.8 vs. 3±0.9 (0.048) in patients falling within WHO 5 category (no difference to WHO 4). Mean hospitalization was 13±2.5 vs. 14±0.8 days (P=0.095) and time to clinical improvement was 2±0.5 vs. 3±0.9 days (P=0.048) in patients with initial 5 WHO category, with no differences to patients who started with WHO stage 4. The time to nasal swab negativization was 10±2.1 vs. 12±0 day (P=0.015). No adverse reactions or intercurrences were detected. All patients presented heterophile antibodies without clinical correlate. The new treatment shows improvement in arterial saturation (days 3 to 12), and a decrease on detectable viral RNA (days 8 to 11) with good pharmacokinetic and safety profile.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Prague medical report
Prague medical report Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
19
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信