加拿大家庭医生对更新健康状况和相关问题分类系统的偏好。

Q2 Medicine
Stephanie Garies, Dewdunee Himasara Pathiraja, Kerry A Mcbrien, James A Dickinson, Noah Crampton, Cathy A Eastwood, Danielle A Southern, Kees Van Boven, Huib Ten Napel, Maeve O'beirne, Alexander Singer, Olawunmi Olagundoye, Keith Denny, David J T Campbell, Terrence Mcdonald, Neil Drummond, Hude Quan, Aimie Lee, Michelle Smekal, William A Ghali, Rubee Dev, Tyler Williamson
{"title":"加拿大家庭医生对更新健康状况和相关问题分类系统的偏好。","authors":"Stephanie Garies, Dewdunee Himasara Pathiraja, Kerry A Mcbrien, James A Dickinson, Noah Crampton, Cathy A Eastwood, Danielle A Southern, Kees Van Boven, Huib Ten Napel, Maeve O'beirne, Alexander Singer, Olawunmi Olagundoye, Keith Denny, David J T Campbell, Terrence Mcdonald, Neil Drummond, Hude Quan, Aimie Lee, Michelle Smekal, William A Ghali, Rubee Dev, Tyler Williamson","doi":"10.12927/hcpol.2025.27663","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Physician billing claims are used to inform health system planning and for other secondary purposes. In most provinces/territories, diagnoses are coded using a system adopted in 1979, the International Classification of Diseases version 9 (ICD-9). This study aimed to understand the perspectives of family physicians on updating ICD-9. Canadian family physicians completed an online patient vignette coding exercise and electronic survey to capture preferences on two newer coding systems (ICD-11; International Classification for Primary Care version 3 [ICPC-3]), compared with the current ICD-9 system. The focus of this paper is the survey data, which were analyzed descriptively. One hundred and sixty-one family physicians from six provinces participated. Over half of them (58%) stated that ICD-9 should be replaced, and 86% of them felt confident learning a new coding system. After the coding exercise, most participants reported that they were very or somewhat satisfied with both newer systems (77% for ICD-11; 73% for ICPC-3). Family physicians in our study support replacing the outdated ICD-9 system to better reflect their workload and patient complexity. This paper provides recommendations for provinces/territories considering modernizing physician billing requirements.</p>","PeriodicalId":39389,"journal":{"name":"Healthcare Policy","volume":"20 4","pages":"57-69"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12460896/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Canadian Family Physician Preferences on Updating the Classification System for Health Conditions and Related Issues.\",\"authors\":\"Stephanie Garies, Dewdunee Himasara Pathiraja, Kerry A Mcbrien, James A Dickinson, Noah Crampton, Cathy A Eastwood, Danielle A Southern, Kees Van Boven, Huib Ten Napel, Maeve O'beirne, Alexander Singer, Olawunmi Olagundoye, Keith Denny, David J T Campbell, Terrence Mcdonald, Neil Drummond, Hude Quan, Aimie Lee, Michelle Smekal, William A Ghali, Rubee Dev, Tyler Williamson\",\"doi\":\"10.12927/hcpol.2025.27663\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Physician billing claims are used to inform health system planning and for other secondary purposes. In most provinces/territories, diagnoses are coded using a system adopted in 1979, the International Classification of Diseases version 9 (ICD-9). This study aimed to understand the perspectives of family physicians on updating ICD-9. Canadian family physicians completed an online patient vignette coding exercise and electronic survey to capture preferences on two newer coding systems (ICD-11; International Classification for Primary Care version 3 [ICPC-3]), compared with the current ICD-9 system. The focus of this paper is the survey data, which were analyzed descriptively. One hundred and sixty-one family physicians from six provinces participated. Over half of them (58%) stated that ICD-9 should be replaced, and 86% of them felt confident learning a new coding system. After the coding exercise, most participants reported that they were very or somewhat satisfied with both newer systems (77% for ICD-11; 73% for ICPC-3). Family physicians in our study support replacing the outdated ICD-9 system to better reflect their workload and patient complexity. This paper provides recommendations for provinces/territories considering modernizing physician billing requirements.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":39389,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Healthcare Policy\",\"volume\":\"20 4\",\"pages\":\"57-69\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12460896/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Healthcare Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12927/hcpol.2025.27663\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Healthcare Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12927/hcpol.2025.27663","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

医生账单索赔用于告知卫生系统规划和其他次要目的。在大多数省/地区,诊断使用1979年采用的国际疾病分类第9版(ICD-9)系统进行编码。本研究旨在了解家庭医生对ICD-9更新的看法。加拿大家庭医生完成了一项在线患者小短文编码练习和电子调查,以获取对两种较新的编码系统(ICD-11;国际初级保健分类第3版[ICPC-3])的偏好,与目前的ICD-9系统进行比较。本文以调查数据为重点,对调查数据进行了描述性分析。来自6个省份的161名家庭医生参与了调查。超过一半的人(58%)表示应该更换ICD-9, 86%的人有信心学习新的编码系统。在编码练习之后,大多数参与者报告说,他们对两个较新的系统都非常满意或有些满意(ICD-11为77%;ICPC-3为73%)。在我们的研究中,家庭医生支持更换过时的ICD-9系统,以更好地反映他们的工作量和患者的复杂性。本文为考虑现代化医生计费要求的省/地区提供了建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Canadian Family Physician Preferences on Updating the Classification System for Health Conditions and Related Issues.

Physician billing claims are used to inform health system planning and for other secondary purposes. In most provinces/territories, diagnoses are coded using a system adopted in 1979, the International Classification of Diseases version 9 (ICD-9). This study aimed to understand the perspectives of family physicians on updating ICD-9. Canadian family physicians completed an online patient vignette coding exercise and electronic survey to capture preferences on two newer coding systems (ICD-11; International Classification for Primary Care version 3 [ICPC-3]), compared with the current ICD-9 system. The focus of this paper is the survey data, which were analyzed descriptively. One hundred and sixty-one family physicians from six provinces participated. Over half of them (58%) stated that ICD-9 should be replaced, and 86% of them felt confident learning a new coding system. After the coding exercise, most participants reported that they were very or somewhat satisfied with both newer systems (77% for ICD-11; 73% for ICPC-3). Family physicians in our study support replacing the outdated ICD-9 system to better reflect their workload and patient complexity. This paper provides recommendations for provinces/territories considering modernizing physician billing requirements.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Healthcare Policy
Healthcare Policy Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
42
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信