动机和途径:对澳大利亚药用大麻消费者访谈的专题分析。

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 PSYCHIATRY
Danielle Dawson, Daniel Stjepanović, Caitlin McClure-Thomas, Valentina Lorenzetti, Wayne Hall, Tianze Sun, Janni Leung
{"title":"动机和途径:对澳大利亚药用大麻消费者访谈的专题分析。","authors":"Danielle Dawson, Daniel Stjepanović, Caitlin McClure-Thomas, Valentina Lorenzetti, Wayne Hall, Tianze Sun, Janni Leung","doi":"10.1080/10826084.2025.2560074","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Medicinal cannabis has been legally available in Australia since 2016. The current study examined the motivations for seeking medicinal cannabis and the pathways through which Australians accessed it.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Brief semi-structured interviews were conducted with 15 adults who self-reported medicinal cannabis use within the past 12 months. Informants were recruited at two cannabis-related events in Queensland and New South Wales. Interviews explored motivations, pathways to access, and experiences with medicinal cannabis. Thematic analysis was conducted using Braun and Clarke's six-step framework which identified two key themes: \"<i>The Diverse Drivers of Medicinal Cannabis Use</i>\" and \"<i>Tales of Access: Journeys to Medicinal Cannabis</i>.\"</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Informants reported varied motivations for medicinal cannabis use, including managing treatment-resistant medical conditions and avoiding the legal consequences of illicit cannabis use. Some described transitioning from recreational to medicinal use, with dual-use (i.e., both recreational and medicinal) motives described in the sample. Accessibility was reported as straightforward, through telehealth consultations and single-purpose dispensaries facilitating prescriptions. Informants reported financial barriers to accessing medicinal cannabis products and frustrations with initial prescriptions of cannabis oil rather than cannabis flower. Informants reported limited knowledge of product constituents and dosages.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The study highlights the nuanced motivations and pathways to medicinal cannabis in Australia, including legal and medical drivers. Accessibility was described as simple through telehealth, single-purpose dispensaries but cost remained a barrier. Dual usage raises concerns about the risks associated with medicinal cannabis use. More qualitative research is needed to better understand the behaviour and risks facing medicinal cannabis consumers.</p>","PeriodicalId":22088,"journal":{"name":"Substance Use & Misuse","volume":" ","pages":"1-5"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Motivations and Pathways: A Thematic Analysis of Interviews with Medicinal Cannabis Consumers in Australia.\",\"authors\":\"Danielle Dawson, Daniel Stjepanović, Caitlin McClure-Thomas, Valentina Lorenzetti, Wayne Hall, Tianze Sun, Janni Leung\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10826084.2025.2560074\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Medicinal cannabis has been legally available in Australia since 2016. The current study examined the motivations for seeking medicinal cannabis and the pathways through which Australians accessed it.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Brief semi-structured interviews were conducted with 15 adults who self-reported medicinal cannabis use within the past 12 months. Informants were recruited at two cannabis-related events in Queensland and New South Wales. Interviews explored motivations, pathways to access, and experiences with medicinal cannabis. Thematic analysis was conducted using Braun and Clarke's six-step framework which identified two key themes: \\\"<i>The Diverse Drivers of Medicinal Cannabis Use</i>\\\" and \\\"<i>Tales of Access: Journeys to Medicinal Cannabis</i>.\\\"</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Informants reported varied motivations for medicinal cannabis use, including managing treatment-resistant medical conditions and avoiding the legal consequences of illicit cannabis use. Some described transitioning from recreational to medicinal use, with dual-use (i.e., both recreational and medicinal) motives described in the sample. Accessibility was reported as straightforward, through telehealth consultations and single-purpose dispensaries facilitating prescriptions. Informants reported financial barriers to accessing medicinal cannabis products and frustrations with initial prescriptions of cannabis oil rather than cannabis flower. Informants reported limited knowledge of product constituents and dosages.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The study highlights the nuanced motivations and pathways to medicinal cannabis in Australia, including legal and medical drivers. Accessibility was described as simple through telehealth, single-purpose dispensaries but cost remained a barrier. Dual usage raises concerns about the risks associated with medicinal cannabis use. More qualitative research is needed to better understand the behaviour and risks facing medicinal cannabis consumers.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22088,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Substance Use & Misuse\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-5\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Substance Use & Misuse\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10826084.2025.2560074\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Substance Use & Misuse","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10826084.2025.2560074","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:自2016年以来,医用大麻已在澳大利亚合法使用。目前的研究调查了寻求药用大麻的动机以及澳大利亚人获取大麻的途径。方法:对15名在过去12个月内自我报告使用医用大麻的成年人进行简短的半结构化访谈。在昆士兰州和新南威尔士州的两个与大麻有关的活动中招募了举报人。访谈探讨了获得药用大麻的动机、途径和经验。主题分析使用Braun和Clarke的六步框架进行,该框架确定了两个关键主题:“药用大麻使用的不同驱动因素”和“获取的故事:药用大麻之旅”。结果:举报人报告了使用医用大麻的各种动机,包括管理难以治疗的疾病和避免非法使用大麻的法律后果。一些人描述了从娱乐到医疗用途的过渡,并在样本中描述了双重用途(即娱乐和医疗)动机。据报告,通过远程保健咨询和便利处方的单一用途药房,可直接获得医疗服务。举报人报告说,在获得药用大麻产品方面存在财务障碍,而且最初开出的处方是大麻油而不是大麻花,令人沮丧。举报者报告对产品成分和剂量的了解有限。结论:该研究强调了澳大利亚药用大麻的细微动机和途径,包括合法和医疗司机。据描述,通过远程保健和单一用途的药房,可获得性很简单,但成本仍然是一个障碍。双重使用引起了人们对医用大麻使用相关风险的担忧。需要进行更多的定性研究,以便更好地了解药用大麻消费者的行为和面临的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Motivations and Pathways: A Thematic Analysis of Interviews with Medicinal Cannabis Consumers in Australia.

Background: Medicinal cannabis has been legally available in Australia since 2016. The current study examined the motivations for seeking medicinal cannabis and the pathways through which Australians accessed it.

Methods: Brief semi-structured interviews were conducted with 15 adults who self-reported medicinal cannabis use within the past 12 months. Informants were recruited at two cannabis-related events in Queensland and New South Wales. Interviews explored motivations, pathways to access, and experiences with medicinal cannabis. Thematic analysis was conducted using Braun and Clarke's six-step framework which identified two key themes: "The Diverse Drivers of Medicinal Cannabis Use" and "Tales of Access: Journeys to Medicinal Cannabis."

Results: Informants reported varied motivations for medicinal cannabis use, including managing treatment-resistant medical conditions and avoiding the legal consequences of illicit cannabis use. Some described transitioning from recreational to medicinal use, with dual-use (i.e., both recreational and medicinal) motives described in the sample. Accessibility was reported as straightforward, through telehealth consultations and single-purpose dispensaries facilitating prescriptions. Informants reported financial barriers to accessing medicinal cannabis products and frustrations with initial prescriptions of cannabis oil rather than cannabis flower. Informants reported limited knowledge of product constituents and dosages.

Conclusions: The study highlights the nuanced motivations and pathways to medicinal cannabis in Australia, including legal and medical drivers. Accessibility was described as simple through telehealth, single-purpose dispensaries but cost remained a barrier. Dual usage raises concerns about the risks associated with medicinal cannabis use. More qualitative research is needed to better understand the behaviour and risks facing medicinal cannabis consumers.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Substance Use & Misuse
Substance Use & Misuse 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
5.00%
发文量
200
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: For over 50 years, Substance Use & Misuse (formerly The International Journal of the Addictions) has provided a unique international multidisciplinary venue for the exchange of original research, theories, policy analyses, and unresolved issues concerning substance use and misuse (licit and illicit drugs, alcohol, nicotine, and eating disorders). Guest editors for special issues devoted to single topics of current concern are invited. Topics covered include: Clinical trials and clinical research (treatment and prevention of substance misuse and related infectious diseases) Epidemiology of substance misuse and related infectious diseases Social pharmacology Meta-analyses and systematic reviews Translation of scientific findings to real world clinical and other settings Adolescent and student-focused research State of the art quantitative and qualitative research Policy analyses Negative results and intervention failures that are instructive Validity studies of instruments, scales, and tests that are generalizable Critiques and essays on unresolved issues Authors can choose to publish gold open access in this journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信