健康健身研究中三种匿名化工具的比较

IF 6.9 2区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
Paul Francis, Gregor Jurak, Bojan Leskošek, Karen Otte, Fabian Prasser
{"title":"健康健身研究中三种匿名化工具的比较","authors":"Paul Francis, Gregor Jurak, Bojan Leskošek, Karen Otte, Fabian Prasser","doi":"10.1038/s41597-025-05823-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>One of many challenges to open science is anonymization of personal data so that it may be shared. This paper presents a case study of the anonymization of a dataset containing cardio-respiratory fitness and commuting patterns for Slovenian school children. It evaluates three different anonymization tools, ARX, SDV, and SynDiffix. The fitness study was selected because its small size (N=713) and generally low statistical significance make it particularly challenging for data anonymization. Unlike most prior anonymization tool evaluations, this paper examines whether the scientific conclusions of the original study would have been supported by the anonymized datasets. It also considers the burden imposed on researchers using the tools both for data generation and data analysis.</p>","PeriodicalId":21597,"journal":{"name":"Scientific Data","volume":"12 1","pages":"1548"},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12446462/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Three Anonymization Tools for a Health Fitness Study.\",\"authors\":\"Paul Francis, Gregor Jurak, Bojan Leskošek, Karen Otte, Fabian Prasser\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41597-025-05823-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>One of many challenges to open science is anonymization of personal data so that it may be shared. This paper presents a case study of the anonymization of a dataset containing cardio-respiratory fitness and commuting patterns for Slovenian school children. It evaluates three different anonymization tools, ARX, SDV, and SynDiffix. The fitness study was selected because its small size (N=713) and generally low statistical significance make it particularly challenging for data anonymization. Unlike most prior anonymization tool evaluations, this paper examines whether the scientific conclusions of the original study would have been supported by the anonymized datasets. It also considers the burden imposed on researchers using the tools both for data generation and data analysis.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21597,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scientific Data\",\"volume\":\"12 1\",\"pages\":\"1548\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12446462/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scientific Data\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"103\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-025-05823-x\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"综合性期刊\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific Data","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-025-05823-x","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

开放科学面临的诸多挑战之一是个人数据的匿名化,以便可以共享。本文提出了一个包含斯洛文尼亚学龄儿童心肺健康和通勤模式的数据集匿名化的案例研究。它评估了三种不同的匿名化工具,ARX、SDV和SynDiffix。之所以选择适应度研究,是因为它的规模较小(N=713),统计显著性普遍较低,这使得数据匿名化特别具有挑战性。与大多数先前的匿名化工具评估不同,本文检查了原始研究的科学结论是否会得到匿名数据集的支持。它还考虑了对使用数据生成和数据分析工具的研究人员施加的负担。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Comparison of Three Anonymization Tools for a Health Fitness Study.

Comparison of Three Anonymization Tools for a Health Fitness Study.

Comparison of Three Anonymization Tools for a Health Fitness Study.

Comparison of Three Anonymization Tools for a Health Fitness Study.

One of many challenges to open science is anonymization of personal data so that it may be shared. This paper presents a case study of the anonymization of a dataset containing cardio-respiratory fitness and commuting patterns for Slovenian school children. It evaluates three different anonymization tools, ARX, SDV, and SynDiffix. The fitness study was selected because its small size (N=713) and generally low statistical significance make it particularly challenging for data anonymization. Unlike most prior anonymization tool evaluations, this paper examines whether the scientific conclusions of the original study would have been supported by the anonymized datasets. It also considers the burden imposed on researchers using the tools both for data generation and data analysis.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Scientific Data
Scientific Data Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
11.20
自引率
4.10%
发文量
689
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Scientific Data is an open-access journal focused on data, publishing descriptions of research datasets and articles on data sharing across natural sciences, medicine, engineering, and social sciences. Its goal is to enhance the sharing and reuse of scientific data, encourage broader data sharing, and acknowledge those who share their data. The journal primarily publishes Data Descriptors, which offer detailed descriptions of research datasets, including data collection methods and technical analyses validating data quality. These descriptors aim to facilitate data reuse rather than testing hypotheses or presenting new interpretations, methods, or in-depth analyses.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信