化学多样性,受体结合亲和力和植物大麻素药理学:对神经机制的见解。

4区 医学 Q3 Neuroscience
Progress in brain research Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2025-08-25 DOI:10.1016/bs.pbr.2025.07.006
Claudio Marcos Queiroz, Laura de Oliveira Koren, Camila Rayane Pereira da Silva, Sidarta Ribeiro, Sérgio Ruschi Bergamachi Silva
{"title":"化学多样性,受体结合亲和力和植物大麻素药理学:对神经机制的见解。","authors":"Claudio Marcos Queiroz, Laura de Oliveira Koren, Camila Rayane Pereira da Silva, Sidarta Ribeiro, Sérgio Ruschi Bergamachi Silva","doi":"10.1016/bs.pbr.2025.07.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Comparative studies of phytocannabinoids offer valuable insights into the therapeutic potential of cannabis. While Cannabis sativa can produce over 100 distinct phytocannabinoids, most are present only in trace amounts. This review examines the structural, biochemical, and pharmacological characteristics of five representative phytocannabinoids: cannabigerol (CBG), cannabichromene (CBC), cannabidiol (CBD), tetrahydrocannabinol (Δ<sup>9</sup>-THC), and cannabinol (CBN). We describe their biosynthetic pathways, abiotic transformations, and precursor roles in generating molecular diversity. Chemovar profiles are discussed based on seed bank data and chromatographic analyses of Brazilian-grown cultivars. Our findings suggest that high-CBD chemovars have recently emerged, possibly due to genetic drift from intensive hybridization. To evaluate the clinical relevance of these compounds, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of binding affinities (Ki) for CB1, CB2, and other neuronal receptors. Δ<sup>9</sup>-THC and CBN showed high affinities for CB1 and CB2, while CBG, CBC, and CBD exhibited 10-100 times lower affinities. Statistical analysis confirmed significantly stronger CB1 and CB2 binding for Δ<sup>9</sup>-THC compared to CBD. These results support the hypothesis that non-psychotropic phytocannabinoids primarily act through non-canonical targets such as GPR55 (G Protein-Coupled Receptor 55), TRPV1 (Transient Receptor Potential Vanilloid 1), and TRPM8 (Transient Receptor Potential Melastatin 8), though affinity data for these receptors remain limited. Finally, we discuss preclinical pharmacological evidence highlighting how subtle structural differences yield distinct physiological effects. Our findings emphasize the need for expanded research into underexplored phytocannabinoids with unique therapeutic potential.</p>","PeriodicalId":20598,"journal":{"name":"Progress in brain research","volume":"296 ","pages":"1-28"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Chemical diversity, receptor binding affinity, and pharmacology of phytocannabinoids: Insights into neuronal mechanisms.\",\"authors\":\"Claudio Marcos Queiroz, Laura de Oliveira Koren, Camila Rayane Pereira da Silva, Sidarta Ribeiro, Sérgio Ruschi Bergamachi Silva\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/bs.pbr.2025.07.006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Comparative studies of phytocannabinoids offer valuable insights into the therapeutic potential of cannabis. While Cannabis sativa can produce over 100 distinct phytocannabinoids, most are present only in trace amounts. This review examines the structural, biochemical, and pharmacological characteristics of five representative phytocannabinoids: cannabigerol (CBG), cannabichromene (CBC), cannabidiol (CBD), tetrahydrocannabinol (Δ<sup>9</sup>-THC), and cannabinol (CBN). We describe their biosynthetic pathways, abiotic transformations, and precursor roles in generating molecular diversity. Chemovar profiles are discussed based on seed bank data and chromatographic analyses of Brazilian-grown cultivars. Our findings suggest that high-CBD chemovars have recently emerged, possibly due to genetic drift from intensive hybridization. To evaluate the clinical relevance of these compounds, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of binding affinities (Ki) for CB1, CB2, and other neuronal receptors. Δ<sup>9</sup>-THC and CBN showed high affinities for CB1 and CB2, while CBG, CBC, and CBD exhibited 10-100 times lower affinities. Statistical analysis confirmed significantly stronger CB1 and CB2 binding for Δ<sup>9</sup>-THC compared to CBD. These results support the hypothesis that non-psychotropic phytocannabinoids primarily act through non-canonical targets such as GPR55 (G Protein-Coupled Receptor 55), TRPV1 (Transient Receptor Potential Vanilloid 1), and TRPM8 (Transient Receptor Potential Melastatin 8), though affinity data for these receptors remain limited. Finally, we discuss preclinical pharmacological evidence highlighting how subtle structural differences yield distinct physiological effects. Our findings emphasize the need for expanded research into underexplored phytocannabinoids with unique therapeutic potential.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20598,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Progress in brain research\",\"volume\":\"296 \",\"pages\":\"1-28\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Progress in brain research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.pbr.2025.07.006\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/8/25 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Neuroscience\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Progress in brain research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.pbr.2025.07.006","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Neuroscience","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

植物大麻素的比较研究为大麻的治疗潜力提供了有价值的见解。虽然大麻可以产生100多种不同的植物大麻素,但大多数仅以微量存在。本文综述了五种具有代表性的植物大麻素的结构、生化和药理学特征:大麻二酚(CBD)、四氢大麻酚(Δ9-THC)和大麻酚(CBN)。我们描述了它们的生物合成途径、非生物转化和前体在产生分子多样性中的作用。根据巴西栽培品种的种子库数据和色谱分析,讨论了化学变异谱。我们的研究结果表明,高cbd趋化物最近出现,可能是由于密集杂交的遗传漂变。为了评估这些化合物的临床相关性,我们对CB1、CB2和其他神经元受体的结合亲和力(Ki)进行了系统回顾和荟萃分析。Δ9-THC和CBN对CB1和CB2的亲和力较高,而CBG、CBC和CBD的亲和力低10-100倍。统计分析证实,与CBD相比,CB1和CB2对Δ9-THC的结合明显更强。这些结果支持了非精神药物植物大麻素主要通过非规范靶点(如GPR55 (G蛋白偶联受体55),TRPV1(瞬时受体电位香素1)和TRPM8(瞬时受体电位美拉他汀8)起作用的假设,尽管这些受体的亲和力数据仍然有限。最后,我们讨论了临床前的药理学证据,强调了细微的结构差异如何产生不同的生理效应。我们的研究结果强调需要扩大对具有独特治疗潜力的未充分开发的植物大麻素的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Chemical diversity, receptor binding affinity, and pharmacology of phytocannabinoids: Insights into neuronal mechanisms.

Comparative studies of phytocannabinoids offer valuable insights into the therapeutic potential of cannabis. While Cannabis sativa can produce over 100 distinct phytocannabinoids, most are present only in trace amounts. This review examines the structural, biochemical, and pharmacological characteristics of five representative phytocannabinoids: cannabigerol (CBG), cannabichromene (CBC), cannabidiol (CBD), tetrahydrocannabinol (Δ9-THC), and cannabinol (CBN). We describe their biosynthetic pathways, abiotic transformations, and precursor roles in generating molecular diversity. Chemovar profiles are discussed based on seed bank data and chromatographic analyses of Brazilian-grown cultivars. Our findings suggest that high-CBD chemovars have recently emerged, possibly due to genetic drift from intensive hybridization. To evaluate the clinical relevance of these compounds, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of binding affinities (Ki) for CB1, CB2, and other neuronal receptors. Δ9-THC and CBN showed high affinities for CB1 and CB2, while CBG, CBC, and CBD exhibited 10-100 times lower affinities. Statistical analysis confirmed significantly stronger CB1 and CB2 binding for Δ9-THC compared to CBD. These results support the hypothesis that non-psychotropic phytocannabinoids primarily act through non-canonical targets such as GPR55 (G Protein-Coupled Receptor 55), TRPV1 (Transient Receptor Potential Vanilloid 1), and TRPM8 (Transient Receptor Potential Melastatin 8), though affinity data for these receptors remain limited. Finally, we discuss preclinical pharmacological evidence highlighting how subtle structural differences yield distinct physiological effects. Our findings emphasize the need for expanded research into underexplored phytocannabinoids with unique therapeutic potential.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Progress in brain research
Progress in brain research 医学-神经科学
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
174
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Progress in Brain Research is the most acclaimed and accomplished series in neuroscience. The serial is well-established as an extensive documentation of contemporary advances in the field. The volumes contain authoritative reviews and original articles by invited specialists. The rigorous editing of the volumes assures that they will appeal to all laboratory and clinical brain research workers in the various disciplines: neuroanatomy, neurophysiology, neuropharmacology, neuroendocrinology, neuropathology, basic neurology, biological psychiatry and the behavioral sciences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信