非苯二氮卓类催眠药物与耳鸣的关系:台湾一项全国性队列研究。

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Nature and Science of Sleep Pub Date : 2025-09-13 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/NSS.S545323
Jen-Tin Lee, Hui-Wen Yang, Cheng-Ping Yu, Yuan-Liang Wen, Sheng-Yin To, Hsiang-Yi Pan, Li-Ting Kao
{"title":"非苯二氮卓类催眠药物与耳鸣的关系:台湾一项全国性队列研究。","authors":"Jen-Tin Lee, Hui-Wen Yang, Cheng-Ping Yu, Yuan-Liang Wen, Sheng-Yin To, Hsiang-Yi Pan, Li-Ting Kao","doi":"10.2147/NSS.S545323","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Non-benzodiazepine hypnotics, commonly known as Z-drugs, are widely prescribed for conditions such as insomnia, anxiety, and epilepsy. Emerging evidence suggests that these agents may influence auditory function and may be associated with tinnitus, potentially through their modulation of GABAA receptors. However, existing research findings on this association remain inconsistent. The objective of this study was to examine the potential association between the use of Z-drugs and the subsequent risk of incident tinnitus.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>This study was conducted using the Taiwan Longitudinal Health Insurance Database. The exposure cohort was composed of all beneficiaries who were prescribed a Z-drug during the study period. The comparison cohort was selected from beneficiaries without any prescription history for Z-drugs during the same timeframe. The primary outcome was the risk of tinnitus within a 5-year follow-up period. To minimize potential confounding, propensity score matching was applied, followed by Cox proportional hazards regression analyses to calculate hazard ratios (HRs) comparing Z-drug users with nonusers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>16,225 patients were identified as Z-drug users, while 1,370,776 were classified as nonusers. Over the 5-year period, Cox proportional hazards regression analysis revealed that Z-drug users had a higher risk of developing tinnitus compared to nonusers (adjusted HR: 1.501; 95% CI: 1.423-1.583). After propensity score matching, this association remained significant (adjusted HR: 1.496; 95% CI: 1.377-1.624). Furthermore, a consistent association between Z-drug use and tinnitus was observed across most subgroups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study suggests that the use of Z-drugs, the most prescribed psychoactive drugs globally, may be associated with an increased risk of developing tinnitus. Limitations include the potential for residual confounding and misclassification inherent to claims-based data. Clinicians should consider this potential association when prescribing Z-drugs.</p>","PeriodicalId":18896,"journal":{"name":"Nature and Science of Sleep","volume":"17 ","pages":"2213-2222"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12442822/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Association Between Non-Benzodiazepine Hypnotics and Tinnitus: A Nationwide Cohort Study in Taiwan.\",\"authors\":\"Jen-Tin Lee, Hui-Wen Yang, Cheng-Ping Yu, Yuan-Liang Wen, Sheng-Yin To, Hsiang-Yi Pan, Li-Ting Kao\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/NSS.S545323\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Non-benzodiazepine hypnotics, commonly known as Z-drugs, are widely prescribed for conditions such as insomnia, anxiety, and epilepsy. Emerging evidence suggests that these agents may influence auditory function and may be associated with tinnitus, potentially through their modulation of GABAA receptors. However, existing research findings on this association remain inconsistent. The objective of this study was to examine the potential association between the use of Z-drugs and the subsequent risk of incident tinnitus.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>This study was conducted using the Taiwan Longitudinal Health Insurance Database. The exposure cohort was composed of all beneficiaries who were prescribed a Z-drug during the study period. The comparison cohort was selected from beneficiaries without any prescription history for Z-drugs during the same timeframe. The primary outcome was the risk of tinnitus within a 5-year follow-up period. To minimize potential confounding, propensity score matching was applied, followed by Cox proportional hazards regression analyses to calculate hazard ratios (HRs) comparing Z-drug users with nonusers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>16,225 patients were identified as Z-drug users, while 1,370,776 were classified as nonusers. Over the 5-year period, Cox proportional hazards regression analysis revealed that Z-drug users had a higher risk of developing tinnitus compared to nonusers (adjusted HR: 1.501; 95% CI: 1.423-1.583). After propensity score matching, this association remained significant (adjusted HR: 1.496; 95% CI: 1.377-1.624). Furthermore, a consistent association between Z-drug use and tinnitus was observed across most subgroups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study suggests that the use of Z-drugs, the most prescribed psychoactive drugs globally, may be associated with an increased risk of developing tinnitus. Limitations include the potential for residual confounding and misclassification inherent to claims-based data. Clinicians should consider this potential association when prescribing Z-drugs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18896,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nature and Science of Sleep\",\"volume\":\"17 \",\"pages\":\"2213-2222\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12442822/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nature and Science of Sleep\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/NSS.S545323\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nature and Science of Sleep","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/NSS.S545323","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

用途:非苯二氮卓类催眠药,通常被称为z -药物,广泛用于失眠、焦虑和癫痫等病症。新出现的证据表明,这些药物可能影响听觉功能,并可能与耳鸣有关,可能通过调节GABAA受体。然而,关于这种关联的现有研究结果仍然不一致。本研究的目的是检查使用z -药物与随后的偶发性耳鸣风险之间的潜在关联。病患与方法:本研究采用台湾健康保险纵向资料库进行。暴露队列由所有在研究期间服用z -药物的受益人组成。比较队列是从同一时间段内没有z -药物处方史的受益人中选择的。主要结果是5年随访期间耳鸣的风险。为了尽量减少潜在的混淆,采用倾向评分匹配,然后进行Cox比例风险回归分析,计算z -吸毒者与非吸毒者之间的风险比(hr)。结果:16225例患者为z -吸毒者,1370776例患者为非吸毒者。在5年的时间里,Cox比例风险回归分析显示,与不使用z -药物的人相比,使用z -药物的人发生耳鸣的风险更高(调整后的HR: 1.501; 95% CI: 1.423-1.583)。在倾向评分匹配后,这种关联仍然显著(调整后的HR: 1.496; 95% CI: 1.377-1.624)。此外,在大多数亚组中观察到z -药物使用与耳鸣之间的一致关联。结论:该研究提示,全球处方最多的精神活性药物z -药物的使用可能与患耳鸣的风险增加有关。局限性包括基于索赔的数据固有的残留混淆和错误分类的可能性。临床医生在开z -药物处方时应考虑到这种潜在的关联。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Association Between Non-Benzodiazepine Hypnotics and Tinnitus: A Nationwide Cohort Study in Taiwan.

Association Between Non-Benzodiazepine Hypnotics and Tinnitus: A Nationwide Cohort Study in Taiwan.

Purpose: Non-benzodiazepine hypnotics, commonly known as Z-drugs, are widely prescribed for conditions such as insomnia, anxiety, and epilepsy. Emerging evidence suggests that these agents may influence auditory function and may be associated with tinnitus, potentially through their modulation of GABAA receptors. However, existing research findings on this association remain inconsistent. The objective of this study was to examine the potential association between the use of Z-drugs and the subsequent risk of incident tinnitus.

Patients and methods: This study was conducted using the Taiwan Longitudinal Health Insurance Database. The exposure cohort was composed of all beneficiaries who were prescribed a Z-drug during the study period. The comparison cohort was selected from beneficiaries without any prescription history for Z-drugs during the same timeframe. The primary outcome was the risk of tinnitus within a 5-year follow-up period. To minimize potential confounding, propensity score matching was applied, followed by Cox proportional hazards regression analyses to calculate hazard ratios (HRs) comparing Z-drug users with nonusers.

Results: 16,225 patients were identified as Z-drug users, while 1,370,776 were classified as nonusers. Over the 5-year period, Cox proportional hazards regression analysis revealed that Z-drug users had a higher risk of developing tinnitus compared to nonusers (adjusted HR: 1.501; 95% CI: 1.423-1.583). After propensity score matching, this association remained significant (adjusted HR: 1.496; 95% CI: 1.377-1.624). Furthermore, a consistent association between Z-drug use and tinnitus was observed across most subgroups.

Conclusion: The study suggests that the use of Z-drugs, the most prescribed psychoactive drugs globally, may be associated with an increased risk of developing tinnitus. Limitations include the potential for residual confounding and misclassification inherent to claims-based data. Clinicians should consider this potential association when prescribing Z-drugs.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Nature and Science of Sleep
Nature and Science of Sleep Neuroscience-Behavioral Neuroscience
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
5.90%
发文量
245
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Nature and Science of Sleep is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal covering all aspects of sleep science and sleep medicine, including the neurophysiology and functions of sleep, the genetics of sleep, sleep and society, biological rhythms, dreaming, sleep disorders and therapy, and strategies to optimize healthy sleep. Specific topics covered in the journal include: The functions of sleep in humans and other animals Physiological and neurophysiological changes with sleep The genetics of sleep and sleep differences The neurotransmitters, receptors and pathways involved in controlling both sleep and wakefulness Behavioral and pharmacological interventions aimed at improving sleep, and improving wakefulness Sleep changes with development and with age Sleep and reproduction (e.g., changes across the menstrual cycle, with pregnancy and menopause) The science and nature of dreams Sleep disorders Impact of sleep and sleep disorders on health, daytime function and quality of life Sleep problems secondary to clinical disorders Interaction of society with sleep (e.g., consequences of shift work, occupational health, public health) The microbiome and sleep Chronotherapy Impact of circadian rhythms on sleep, physiology, cognition and health Mechanisms controlling circadian rhythms, centrally and peripherally Impact of circadian rhythm disruptions (including night shift work, jet lag and social jet lag) on sleep, physiology, cognition and health Behavioral and pharmacological interventions aimed at reducing adverse effects of circadian-related sleep disruption Assessment of technologies and biomarkers for measuring sleep and/or circadian rhythms Epigenetic markers of sleep or circadian disruption.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信