基于人工智能的结直肠癌手术患者决策支持预测模型的临床实现。

IF 50 1区 医学 Q1 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
Andreas Weinberger Rosen, Ilze Ose, Mikail Gögenur, Lars Peter Kloster Andersen, Rasmus Dahlin Bojesen, Rasmus Peuliche Vogelsang, Martin Høyer Rose, Philip Wallentin Steenfos, Lasse Bremholm Hansen, Helle Skadborg Spuur, Ines Raben, Søren Thorgaard Skou, Ellen Astrid Holm, Karina Mortensen, Trine Kjær, Jens Ravn Eriksen, Ismail Gögenur
{"title":"基于人工智能的结直肠癌手术患者决策支持预测模型的临床实现。","authors":"Andreas Weinberger Rosen, Ilze Ose, Mikail Gögenur, Lars Peter Kloster Andersen, Rasmus Dahlin Bojesen, Rasmus Peuliche Vogelsang, Martin Høyer Rose, Philip Wallentin Steenfos, Lasse Bremholm Hansen, Helle Skadborg Spuur, Ines Raben, Søren Thorgaard Skou, Ellen Astrid Holm, Karina Mortensen, Trine Kjær, Jens Ravn Eriksen, Ismail Gögenur","doi":"10.1038/s41591-025-03942-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Adverse outcomes after elective cancer surgery are a main contributor to decreased survival, poorer oncological outcomes and increased healthcare costs. Identifying high-risk patients and selecting interventions according to individual risk profiles in the perioperative period in cancer surgery is a challenge. Using real-world data on 18,403 patients with colorectal cancer from Danish national registries and consecutive patients from a single center, we developed, validated and implemented an artificial-intelligence-based risk prediction model in clinical practice as a decision support tool for personalized perioperative treatment. Personalized treatment pathways were designed according to the predicted risk of 1-year mortality with the intensity of interventions increasing with the predicted risk. The developed model had an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.79 in the validation set. Results from the nonrandomized before/after cohort study showed an incidence proportion of the comprehensive complication index >20 of 19.1% in the personalized treatment group versus 28.0% in the standard-of-care group, adjusted odds ratio of 0.63 (95% confidence interval, 0.42-0.92; P = 0.02). The incidence of any medical complication was 23.7% in the personalized treatment group and 37.3% in the standard-of-care group; odds ratio of 0.53 (95% confidence interval, 0.36-0.76; P < 0.001). According to the short-term health economic modeling, personalized perioperative treatment was cost effective. The study demonstrates a fully scalable registry-based approach for using readily available data in an artificial-intelligence-based decision support pipeline in clinical practice. Our results indicate that this specific approach can be a cost-effective strategy to improve key surgical clinical outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":19037,"journal":{"name":"Nature Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":50.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical implementation of an AI-based prediction model for decision support for patients undergoing colorectal cancer surgery.\",\"authors\":\"Andreas Weinberger Rosen, Ilze Ose, Mikail Gögenur, Lars Peter Kloster Andersen, Rasmus Dahlin Bojesen, Rasmus Peuliche Vogelsang, Martin Høyer Rose, Philip Wallentin Steenfos, Lasse Bremholm Hansen, Helle Skadborg Spuur, Ines Raben, Søren Thorgaard Skou, Ellen Astrid Holm, Karina Mortensen, Trine Kjær, Jens Ravn Eriksen, Ismail Gögenur\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41591-025-03942-x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Adverse outcomes after elective cancer surgery are a main contributor to decreased survival, poorer oncological outcomes and increased healthcare costs. Identifying high-risk patients and selecting interventions according to individual risk profiles in the perioperative period in cancer surgery is a challenge. Using real-world data on 18,403 patients with colorectal cancer from Danish national registries and consecutive patients from a single center, we developed, validated and implemented an artificial-intelligence-based risk prediction model in clinical practice as a decision support tool for personalized perioperative treatment. Personalized treatment pathways were designed according to the predicted risk of 1-year mortality with the intensity of interventions increasing with the predicted risk. The developed model had an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.79 in the validation set. Results from the nonrandomized before/after cohort study showed an incidence proportion of the comprehensive complication index >20 of 19.1% in the personalized treatment group versus 28.0% in the standard-of-care group, adjusted odds ratio of 0.63 (95% confidence interval, 0.42-0.92; P = 0.02). The incidence of any medical complication was 23.7% in the personalized treatment group and 37.3% in the standard-of-care group; odds ratio of 0.53 (95% confidence interval, 0.36-0.76; P < 0.001). According to the short-term health economic modeling, personalized perioperative treatment was cost effective. The study demonstrates a fully scalable registry-based approach for using readily available data in an artificial-intelligence-based decision support pipeline in clinical practice. Our results indicate that this specific approach can be a cost-effective strategy to improve key surgical clinical outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19037,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nature Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":50.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nature Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-025-03942-x\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nature Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-025-03942-x","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

选择性癌症手术后的不良后果是导致生存率降低、肿瘤预后较差和医疗费用增加的主要原因。在癌症手术围手术期,根据个体风险特征识别高危患者并选择干预措施是一个挑战。利用来自丹麦国家登记处的18403名结直肠癌患者和来自单个中心的连续患者的真实数据,我们开发、验证并实施了基于人工智能的风险预测模型,作为个性化围手术期治疗的决策支持工具。根据预测的1年死亡风险设计个性化治疗途径,干预强度随预测风险的增加而增加。该模型在验证集中的受试者工作特征曲线下面积为0.79。非随机前后队列研究结果显示,个性化治疗组综合并发症指数bbb20的发生率为19.1%,标准治疗组为28.0%,校正优势比为0.63(95%可信区间,0.42-0.92;P = 0.02)。个性化治疗组和标准治疗组的并发症发生率分别为23.7%和37.3%;优势比为0.53(95%置信区间,0.36-0.76
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Clinical implementation of an AI-based prediction model for decision support for patients undergoing colorectal cancer surgery.

Adverse outcomes after elective cancer surgery are a main contributor to decreased survival, poorer oncological outcomes and increased healthcare costs. Identifying high-risk patients and selecting interventions according to individual risk profiles in the perioperative period in cancer surgery is a challenge. Using real-world data on 18,403 patients with colorectal cancer from Danish national registries and consecutive patients from a single center, we developed, validated and implemented an artificial-intelligence-based risk prediction model in clinical practice as a decision support tool for personalized perioperative treatment. Personalized treatment pathways were designed according to the predicted risk of 1-year mortality with the intensity of interventions increasing with the predicted risk. The developed model had an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.79 in the validation set. Results from the nonrandomized before/after cohort study showed an incidence proportion of the comprehensive complication index >20 of 19.1% in the personalized treatment group versus 28.0% in the standard-of-care group, adjusted odds ratio of 0.63 (95% confidence interval, 0.42-0.92; P = 0.02). The incidence of any medical complication was 23.7% in the personalized treatment group and 37.3% in the standard-of-care group; odds ratio of 0.53 (95% confidence interval, 0.36-0.76; P < 0.001). According to the short-term health economic modeling, personalized perioperative treatment was cost effective. The study demonstrates a fully scalable registry-based approach for using readily available data in an artificial-intelligence-based decision support pipeline in clinical practice. Our results indicate that this specific approach can be a cost-effective strategy to improve key surgical clinical outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Nature Medicine
Nature Medicine 医学-生化与分子生物学
CiteScore
100.90
自引率
0.70%
发文量
525
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Nature Medicine is a monthly journal publishing original peer-reviewed research in all areas of medicine. The publication focuses on originality, timeliness, interdisciplinary interest, and the impact on improving human health. In addition to research articles, Nature Medicine also publishes commissioned content such as News, Reviews, and Perspectives. This content aims to provide context for the latest advances in translational and clinical research, reaching a wide audience of M.D. and Ph.D. readers. All editorial decisions for the journal are made by a team of full-time professional editors. Nature Medicine consider all types of clinical research, including: -Case-reports and small case series -Clinical trials, whether phase 1, 2, 3 or 4 -Observational studies -Meta-analyses -Biomarker studies -Public and global health studies Nature Medicine is also committed to facilitating communication between translational and clinical researchers. As such, we consider “hybrid” studies with preclinical and translational findings reported alongside data from clinical studies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信