接受辅助生殖技术的女性和男性的心理干预经验:定性的系统回顾。

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Crystal Min Siu Chua, Zhongwei Huang, Hsiu Kim Lina Lim, Apiradee Nantsupawat, Orn-Anong Wichaikhum, Jovin Jie Ning Lee, Cornelia Yin Ing Chee, Shefaly Shorey
{"title":"接受辅助生殖技术的女性和男性的心理干预经验:定性的系统回顾。","authors":"Crystal Min Siu Chua, Zhongwei Huang, Hsiu Kim Lina Lim, Apiradee Nantsupawat, Orn-Anong Wichaikhum, Jovin Jie Ning Lee, Cornelia Yin Ing Chee, Shefaly Shorey","doi":"10.1002/ijgo.70533","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Given the adverse psycho-emotional impacts, psychological interventions can support couples undergoing assisted reproductive technologies (ART). A qualitative systematic review is needed to help us understand the intricacies of the experiences with ART-based psychological interventions. This study consolidates and synthesizes available evidence of experiences of women and men undergoing ART with psychological interventions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Six electronic databases were searched for studies published in English from the inception date (1961) up to February 2023: Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), PubMed, Embase, PsycINFO, Scopus, and Mednar. Studies that used qualitative research designs or mixed methods on women and men experience with psychological interventions during ART were included. The Critical Appraisal Skills Program tool was used to appraise the quality of the included studies. The review was registered on the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews. The data synthesis was guided by Sandelowski and Barroso's guidelines.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ten qualitative studies were included in this systematic review. The identified overarching theme was the impact of psychological interventions from \"being lost\" to \"finding ways,\" which was supported by three themes: (1) better coping and acceptance of infertility, (2) knowing and \"finding ways\" to what was unknown, and (3) preferred way forward for infertility treatment.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study reveal that psychological interventions were favorable for women and men undergoing ART with perceived lower stress levels and anxiety symptoms. Participants from the included studies also expressed better coping skills. Both women and men in the included studies highlighted that future interventions should provide adequate educational information on ART, teach individualized coping skills, and offer psychological support, specifically for those with unsuccessful ART outcomes. Moreover, couple-based interventions should be further explored from varied geographical and cultural backgrounds.</p>","PeriodicalId":14164,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Experiences of psychological interventions for women and men undergoing assisted reproductive technologies: A qualitative systematic review.\",\"authors\":\"Crystal Min Siu Chua, Zhongwei Huang, Hsiu Kim Lina Lim, Apiradee Nantsupawat, Orn-Anong Wichaikhum, Jovin Jie Ning Lee, Cornelia Yin Ing Chee, Shefaly Shorey\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ijgo.70533\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Given the adverse psycho-emotional impacts, psychological interventions can support couples undergoing assisted reproductive technologies (ART). A qualitative systematic review is needed to help us understand the intricacies of the experiences with ART-based psychological interventions. This study consolidates and synthesizes available evidence of experiences of women and men undergoing ART with psychological interventions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Six electronic databases were searched for studies published in English from the inception date (1961) up to February 2023: Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), PubMed, Embase, PsycINFO, Scopus, and Mednar. Studies that used qualitative research designs or mixed methods on women and men experience with psychological interventions during ART were included. The Critical Appraisal Skills Program tool was used to appraise the quality of the included studies. The review was registered on the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews. The data synthesis was guided by Sandelowski and Barroso's guidelines.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Ten qualitative studies were included in this systematic review. The identified overarching theme was the impact of psychological interventions from \\\"being lost\\\" to \\\"finding ways,\\\" which was supported by three themes: (1) better coping and acceptance of infertility, (2) knowing and \\\"finding ways\\\" to what was unknown, and (3) preferred way forward for infertility treatment.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study reveal that psychological interventions were favorable for women and men undergoing ART with perceived lower stress levels and anxiety symptoms. Participants from the included studies also expressed better coping skills. Both women and men in the included studies highlighted that future interventions should provide adequate educational information on ART, teach individualized coping skills, and offer psychological support, specifically for those with unsuccessful ART outcomes. Moreover, couple-based interventions should be further explored from varied geographical and cultural backgrounds.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14164,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.70533\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.70533","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:考虑到辅助生殖技术的不良心理情绪影响,心理干预可以支持夫妇进行辅助生殖技术(ART)。我们需要一个定性的系统回顾来帮助我们理解基于艺术的心理干预的复杂性。本研究整合并综合了有关接受抗逆转录病毒治疗并进行心理干预的男女经验的现有证据。方法:检索自1961年创刊至2023年2月发表的英文研究的6个电子数据库:护理与相关健康文献累积索引(CINAHL)、PubMed、Embase、PsycINFO、Scopus和Mednar。采用定性研究设计或混合方法对妇女和男子在抗逆转录病毒治疗期间进行心理干预的经历进行研究。关键评估技能程序工具用于评估纳入研究的质量。该综述已在国际前瞻性系统综述登记册上注册。数据综合是由Sandelowski和Barroso的指导方针指导的。结果:本系统综述纳入了10项定性研究。确定的总体主题是心理干预从“迷失”到“寻找方法”的影响,这由三个主题支持:(1)更好地应对和接受不孕症,(2)了解和“寻找方法”未知的东西,以及(3)首选的不孕症治疗方法。结论:本研究表明,心理干预对接受抗逆转录病毒治疗的压力水平和焦虑症状较低的女性和男性都有利。纳入研究的参与者也表现出更好的应对技能。在纳入的研究中,女性和男性都强调,未来的干预措施应提供有关抗逆转录病毒治疗的充分教育信息,教授个性化的应对技能,并提供心理支持,特别是对那些抗逆转录病毒治疗结果不成功的人。此外,应从不同的地理和文化背景进一步探索以夫妻为基础的干预措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Experiences of psychological interventions for women and men undergoing assisted reproductive technologies: A qualitative systematic review.

Objective: Given the adverse psycho-emotional impacts, psychological interventions can support couples undergoing assisted reproductive technologies (ART). A qualitative systematic review is needed to help us understand the intricacies of the experiences with ART-based psychological interventions. This study consolidates and synthesizes available evidence of experiences of women and men undergoing ART with psychological interventions.

Methods: Six electronic databases were searched for studies published in English from the inception date (1961) up to February 2023: Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), PubMed, Embase, PsycINFO, Scopus, and Mednar. Studies that used qualitative research designs or mixed methods on women and men experience with psychological interventions during ART were included. The Critical Appraisal Skills Program tool was used to appraise the quality of the included studies. The review was registered on the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews. The data synthesis was guided by Sandelowski and Barroso's guidelines.

Results: Ten qualitative studies were included in this systematic review. The identified overarching theme was the impact of psychological interventions from "being lost" to "finding ways," which was supported by three themes: (1) better coping and acceptance of infertility, (2) knowing and "finding ways" to what was unknown, and (3) preferred way forward for infertility treatment.

Conclusion: The study reveal that psychological interventions were favorable for women and men undergoing ART with perceived lower stress levels and anxiety symptoms. Participants from the included studies also expressed better coping skills. Both women and men in the included studies highlighted that future interventions should provide adequate educational information on ART, teach individualized coping skills, and offer psychological support, specifically for those with unsuccessful ART outcomes. Moreover, couple-based interventions should be further explored from varied geographical and cultural backgrounds.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
2.60%
发文量
493
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics publishes articles on all aspects of basic and clinical research in the fields of obstetrics and gynecology and related subjects, with emphasis on matters of worldwide interest.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信