肠道微生物群与运动:干预措施和证据限制的系统回顾。

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q2 SPORT SCIENCES
Stephanie Gaskell, Isabel Martinez, Ricardo J S Costa
{"title":"肠道微生物群与运动:干预措施和证据限制的系统回顾。","authors":"Stephanie Gaskell, Isabel Martinez, Ricardo J S Costa","doi":"10.1055/a-2705-2210","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This systematic literature review assessed whether nutritional supplement, dietary, and exercise interventions influence gut microbiota and subsequent exercise performance. Following PRISMA guidelines, a comprehensive search was conducted across five databases (Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL Complete, Web of Science, and Scopus) up to February 2025. Included studies involved healthy, active adults undergoing nutrient supplementation, dietary, and/or exercise interventions with a control or placebo comparator. Outcomes included faecal bacterial composition (α-diversity, relative abundance), short chain fatty acids (SCFA), in adjunct with exercise performance (i.e., time-trial, time to exhaustion, maximal strength). Eighteen studies met the inclusion criteria. Due to methodological heterogeneity, a descriptive synthesis was performed. Changes in faecal microbiota diversity and composition were highly variable and largely minimal. SCFA outcomes were infrequently assessed; only one study reported a significant increase in faecal acetate concentration following yoghurt supplementation containing Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis BL-99. Only seven studies examined the relationship between changes in faecal bacterial profile and performance outcomes, with limited or inconclusive findings. No consistent performance benefits were observed in relation to microbiota changes. Risk of bias and methodological limitations were common, including variation in interventions, outcome measures, and microbiota analysis methods. Taken together, the current evidence base remains too limited and heterogeneous to draw firm conclusions about the efficacy of microbiota-targeted interventions for enhancing exercise performance in healthy, active adults. Future studies employing standardised methods, mechanistic outcome measures, and longitudinal designs may help clarify the potential of microbiota modulation as a performance-enhancing strategy.</p>","PeriodicalId":14439,"journal":{"name":"International journal of sports medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Gut microbiota and exercise: A systematic review of interventions and evidence limitations.\",\"authors\":\"Stephanie Gaskell, Isabel Martinez, Ricardo J S Costa\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/a-2705-2210\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This systematic literature review assessed whether nutritional supplement, dietary, and exercise interventions influence gut microbiota and subsequent exercise performance. Following PRISMA guidelines, a comprehensive search was conducted across five databases (Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL Complete, Web of Science, and Scopus) up to February 2025. Included studies involved healthy, active adults undergoing nutrient supplementation, dietary, and/or exercise interventions with a control or placebo comparator. Outcomes included faecal bacterial composition (α-diversity, relative abundance), short chain fatty acids (SCFA), in adjunct with exercise performance (i.e., time-trial, time to exhaustion, maximal strength). Eighteen studies met the inclusion criteria. Due to methodological heterogeneity, a descriptive synthesis was performed. Changes in faecal microbiota diversity and composition were highly variable and largely minimal. SCFA outcomes were infrequently assessed; only one study reported a significant increase in faecal acetate concentration following yoghurt supplementation containing Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis BL-99. Only seven studies examined the relationship between changes in faecal bacterial profile and performance outcomes, with limited or inconclusive findings. No consistent performance benefits were observed in relation to microbiota changes. Risk of bias and methodological limitations were common, including variation in interventions, outcome measures, and microbiota analysis methods. Taken together, the current evidence base remains too limited and heterogeneous to draw firm conclusions about the efficacy of microbiota-targeted interventions for enhancing exercise performance in healthy, active adults. Future studies employing standardised methods, mechanistic outcome measures, and longitudinal designs may help clarify the potential of microbiota modulation as a performance-enhancing strategy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14439,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of sports medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of sports medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2705-2210\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SPORT SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of sports medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2705-2210","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本系统的文献综述评估了营养补充剂、饮食和运动干预是否会影响肠道微生物群和随后的运动表现。按照PRISMA的指导方针,在5个数据库(Ovid MEDLINE、EMBASE、CINAHL Complete、Web of Science和Scopus)中进行了全面的检索,截止到2025年2月。纳入的研究涉及健康、活跃的成年人,他们接受营养补充、饮食和/或运动干预,对照或安慰剂比较。结果包括粪便细菌组成(α-多样性,相对丰度),短链脂肪酸(SCFA),以及运动表现(即计时,疲劳时间,最大力量)。18项研究符合纳入标准。由于方法的异质性,进行了描述性综合。粪便微生物群的多样性和组成变化很大,而且变化很小。很少评估SCFA的结果;只有一项研究报告了添加含有动物双歧杆菌亚种的酸奶后粪便醋酸盐浓度显著增加。lactis提单- 99。只有7项研究检查了粪便细菌谱变化与表现结果之间的关系,结果有限或不确定。没有观察到与微生物群变化有关的一致的性能益处。偏倚风险和方法局限性是常见的,包括干预措施、结果测量和微生物群分析方法的差异。综上所述,目前的证据基础仍然过于有限和异质性,无法得出明确的结论,即针对微生物群的干预措施对提高健康、活跃的成年人的运动表现的有效性。未来的研究采用标准化方法、机械结果测量和纵向设计,可能有助于阐明微生物群调节作为一种提高成绩策略的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Gut microbiota and exercise: A systematic review of interventions and evidence limitations.

This systematic literature review assessed whether nutritional supplement, dietary, and exercise interventions influence gut microbiota and subsequent exercise performance. Following PRISMA guidelines, a comprehensive search was conducted across five databases (Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL Complete, Web of Science, and Scopus) up to February 2025. Included studies involved healthy, active adults undergoing nutrient supplementation, dietary, and/or exercise interventions with a control or placebo comparator. Outcomes included faecal bacterial composition (α-diversity, relative abundance), short chain fatty acids (SCFA), in adjunct with exercise performance (i.e., time-trial, time to exhaustion, maximal strength). Eighteen studies met the inclusion criteria. Due to methodological heterogeneity, a descriptive synthesis was performed. Changes in faecal microbiota diversity and composition were highly variable and largely minimal. SCFA outcomes were infrequently assessed; only one study reported a significant increase in faecal acetate concentration following yoghurt supplementation containing Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis BL-99. Only seven studies examined the relationship between changes in faecal bacterial profile and performance outcomes, with limited or inconclusive findings. No consistent performance benefits were observed in relation to microbiota changes. Risk of bias and methodological limitations were common, including variation in interventions, outcome measures, and microbiota analysis methods. Taken together, the current evidence base remains too limited and heterogeneous to draw firm conclusions about the efficacy of microbiota-targeted interventions for enhancing exercise performance in healthy, active adults. Future studies employing standardised methods, mechanistic outcome measures, and longitudinal designs may help clarify the potential of microbiota modulation as a performance-enhancing strategy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
4.00%
发文量
111
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The IJSM provides a forum for the publication of papers dealing with both basic and applied information that advance the field of sports medicine and exercise science, and offer a better understanding of biomedicine. The journal publishes original papers, reviews, short communications, and letters to the Editors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信