先天性心脏病手术中肺血管扩张剂和舒张剂药物的疗效和安全性:随机对照试验的系统评价和网络meta分析

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Martina Ollosu, Vincenzo Francesco Tripodi, Carlotta Aresu, Giammarco Ledda, Francesca Manai, Chiara Marini, Mario Musu, Mariachiara Ippolito, Andrea Cortegiani, Gabriele Finco, Salvatore Sardo
{"title":"先天性心脏病手术中肺血管扩张剂和舒张剂药物的疗效和安全性:随机对照试验的系统评价和网络meta分析","authors":"Martina Ollosu, Vincenzo Francesco Tripodi, Carlotta Aresu, Giammarco Ledda, Francesca Manai, Chiara Marini, Mario Musu, Mariachiara Ippolito, Andrea Cortegiani, Gabriele Finco, Salvatore Sardo","doi":"10.1053/j.jvca.2025.08.053","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Perioperative management of congenital heart disease (CHD) surgery presents a unique challenge due to significant pathophysiological alterations, with pulmonary hypertension contributing substantially to morbidity and mortality. Although pulmonary vasodilators and inodilators are commonly used, evidence of their efficacy and safety remains limited.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of vasodilators and inodilators in pediatric patients undergoing CHD surgery.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Systematic review with network meta-analysis.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>PubMed, CENTRAL, and Embase.</p><p><strong>Eligibility criteria: </strong>We included single- or double-blind, parallel-group, randomized controlled trials comparing the perioperative use of vasodilators and inodilators in pediatric CHD surgery. We selected only English-language studies. We excluded crossover, non randomized trials and trials comparing the same drugs in all study arms.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 28 randomized controlled trials involving 3118 patients. Intravenous levosimendan ranked highest in decreasing postoperative mortality, although the effect was not statistically significant. Intravenous sildenafil and inhaled nitric oxide (NO) significantly reduced the duration of mechanical ventilation, and inhaled NO also significantly shortened the length of intensive care unit stay. Inhaled iloprost, NO, and enteral sildenafil reduced mean pulmonary artery pressure. No intervention significantly affected the incidence of acute kidney injury.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Vasodilators and inodilators did not significantly decrease perioperative mortality in pediatric CHD. Some agents, such as intravenous sildenafil and inhaled NO, demonstrated modest benefits of questionable clinical significance regarding duration of mechanical ventilation, intensive care unit stay, and pulmonary pressure. The results are limited by small sample sizes, study heterogeneity, variability in standard care, and risk of bias, requiring cautious interpretation.</p><p><strong>Registration: </strong>CRD42024552531.</p>","PeriodicalId":15176,"journal":{"name":"Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy and Safety of Pulmonary Vasodilator and Inodilator Drugs in Congenital Heart Disease Surgery: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.\",\"authors\":\"Martina Ollosu, Vincenzo Francesco Tripodi, Carlotta Aresu, Giammarco Ledda, Francesca Manai, Chiara Marini, Mario Musu, Mariachiara Ippolito, Andrea Cortegiani, Gabriele Finco, Salvatore Sardo\",\"doi\":\"10.1053/j.jvca.2025.08.053\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Perioperative management of congenital heart disease (CHD) surgery presents a unique challenge due to significant pathophysiological alterations, with pulmonary hypertension contributing substantially to morbidity and mortality. Although pulmonary vasodilators and inodilators are commonly used, evidence of their efficacy and safety remains limited.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of vasodilators and inodilators in pediatric patients undergoing CHD surgery.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Systematic review with network meta-analysis.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>PubMed, CENTRAL, and Embase.</p><p><strong>Eligibility criteria: </strong>We included single- or double-blind, parallel-group, randomized controlled trials comparing the perioperative use of vasodilators and inodilators in pediatric CHD surgery. We selected only English-language studies. We excluded crossover, non randomized trials and trials comparing the same drugs in all study arms.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 28 randomized controlled trials involving 3118 patients. Intravenous levosimendan ranked highest in decreasing postoperative mortality, although the effect was not statistically significant. Intravenous sildenafil and inhaled nitric oxide (NO) significantly reduced the duration of mechanical ventilation, and inhaled NO also significantly shortened the length of intensive care unit stay. Inhaled iloprost, NO, and enteral sildenafil reduced mean pulmonary artery pressure. No intervention significantly affected the incidence of acute kidney injury.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Vasodilators and inodilators did not significantly decrease perioperative mortality in pediatric CHD. Some agents, such as intravenous sildenafil and inhaled NO, demonstrated modest benefits of questionable clinical significance regarding duration of mechanical ventilation, intensive care unit stay, and pulmonary pressure. The results are limited by small sample sizes, study heterogeneity, variability in standard care, and risk of bias, requiring cautious interpretation.</p><p><strong>Registration: </strong>CRD42024552531.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15176,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jvca.2025.08.053\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jvca.2025.08.053","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:由于显著的病理生理改变,先天性心脏病(CHD)手术的围手术期管理提出了一个独特的挑战,肺动脉高压是导致发病率和死亡率的主要原因。虽然常用肺血管扩张剂和消张剂,但其有效性和安全性的证据仍然有限。目的:评价血管扩张剂和舒张剂在小儿冠心病手术中的有效性和安全性。设计:采用网络荟萃分析进行系统评价。数据来源:PubMed, CENTRAL和Embase。入选标准:我们纳入了单盲或双盲、平行组、随机对照试验,比较儿童冠心病手术围手术期血管扩张剂和非扩张剂的使用。我们只选择了英语研究。我们排除了交叉试验、非随机试验和在所有研究组中比较相同药物的试验。结果:我们纳入了28项随机对照试验,涉及3118例患者。静脉注射左西孟旦在降低术后死亡率方面排名最高,但效果无统计学意义。静脉注射西地那非和吸入一氧化氮(NO)显著缩短了机械通气时间,吸入一氧化氮(NO)也显著缩短了重症监护病房的住院时间。吸入伊洛前列素、一氧化氮和注射西地那非可降低平均肺动脉压。干预对急性肾损伤发生率无显著影响。结论:血管扩张剂和血管不扩张剂没有显著降低小儿冠心病围手术期死亡率。一些药物,如静脉注射西地那非和吸入一氧化氮,在机械通气时间、重症监护病房住院时间和肺压力方面显示出适度的临床意义值得怀疑。研究结果受到样本量小、研究异质性、标准护理的可变性和偏倚风险的限制,需要谨慎解释。注册:CRD42024552531。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Efficacy and Safety of Pulmonary Vasodilator and Inodilator Drugs in Congenital Heart Disease Surgery: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Background: Perioperative management of congenital heart disease (CHD) surgery presents a unique challenge due to significant pathophysiological alterations, with pulmonary hypertension contributing substantially to morbidity and mortality. Although pulmonary vasodilators and inodilators are commonly used, evidence of their efficacy and safety remains limited.

Objectives: To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of vasodilators and inodilators in pediatric patients undergoing CHD surgery.

Design: Systematic review with network meta-analysis.

Data sources: PubMed, CENTRAL, and Embase.

Eligibility criteria: We included single- or double-blind, parallel-group, randomized controlled trials comparing the perioperative use of vasodilators and inodilators in pediatric CHD surgery. We selected only English-language studies. We excluded crossover, non randomized trials and trials comparing the same drugs in all study arms.

Results: We included 28 randomized controlled trials involving 3118 patients. Intravenous levosimendan ranked highest in decreasing postoperative mortality, although the effect was not statistically significant. Intravenous sildenafil and inhaled nitric oxide (NO) significantly reduced the duration of mechanical ventilation, and inhaled NO also significantly shortened the length of intensive care unit stay. Inhaled iloprost, NO, and enteral sildenafil reduced mean pulmonary artery pressure. No intervention significantly affected the incidence of acute kidney injury.

Conclusions: Vasodilators and inodilators did not significantly decrease perioperative mortality in pediatric CHD. Some agents, such as intravenous sildenafil and inhaled NO, demonstrated modest benefits of questionable clinical significance regarding duration of mechanical ventilation, intensive care unit stay, and pulmonary pressure. The results are limited by small sample sizes, study heterogeneity, variability in standard care, and risk of bias, requiring cautious interpretation.

Registration: CRD42024552531.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
17.90%
发文量
606
审稿时长
37 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia is primarily aimed at anesthesiologists who deal with patients undergoing cardiac, thoracic or vascular surgical procedures. JCVA features a multidisciplinary approach, with contributions from cardiac, vascular and thoracic surgeons, cardiologists, and other related specialists. Emphasis is placed on rapid publication of clinically relevant material.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信