{"title":"响度不适水平在延长的高频在年轻人:一个潜在的标志听觉亢进。","authors":"Charlotte Bigras , Victoria Duda , Sylvie Hébert","doi":"10.1016/j.heares.2025.109425","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Loudness discomfort levels (LDLs) are typically measured only at standard frequencies (0.25–8 kHz), which may limit their diagnostic utility in assessing loudness disorders such as hyperacusis. The aim of this study was to (1) establish normative LDL for extended high frequencies (EHFs, 9–16 kHz) in a <em>non-hyperacusis</em> population, (2) examine associations with participant audiological and demographic characteristics, and (3) explore EHFs LDLs in a small group of self-reported <em>hyperacusis</em> participants. We recruited 103 participants (52 female, 50 male, 1 non-binary) with a mean age of 27.5 years, divided into a <em>non-hyperacusis</em> group (<em>n</em> = 94) and a <em>hyperacusis</em> group (<em>n</em> = 9). Pure tone hearing thresholds (HTs) were measured from 0.25 to 16 kHz and LDLs were assessed at 0.5, 4, 9, 11.2, 12.5, 14 and 16 kHz. In <em>non-hyperacusis</em> participants, average EHF LDLs were of 74 dB HL (SD = 9.1–16.8; range = 10–100). LDLs showed small to medium negative correlations with the Hyperacusis Questionnaire (HQ), the Noise Sensitivity Scale (NSS) and the depression subscale of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, but no significant correlations with age or anxiety. <em>Hyperacusis</em> participants had significantly worse EHF average HTs, lower LDLs and reduced dynamic ranges across frequency ranges. This study provides the first report of LDLs for EHF in a large cohort and is a valuable reference for audiologists. These findings suggest that EHF measures could improve the diagnosis of loudness related disorders such as hyperacusis, supporting early identification and tailored interventions. Further research is needed to fully assess the clinical value of EHF LDL assessments.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12881,"journal":{"name":"Hearing Research","volume":"467 ","pages":"Article 109425"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Loudness discomfort levels at extended high frequencies in young adults: A potential marker of hyperacusis\",\"authors\":\"Charlotte Bigras , Victoria Duda , Sylvie Hébert\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.heares.2025.109425\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Loudness discomfort levels (LDLs) are typically measured only at standard frequencies (0.25–8 kHz), which may limit their diagnostic utility in assessing loudness disorders such as hyperacusis. The aim of this study was to (1) establish normative LDL for extended high frequencies (EHFs, 9–16 kHz) in a <em>non-hyperacusis</em> population, (2) examine associations with participant audiological and demographic characteristics, and (3) explore EHFs LDLs in a small group of self-reported <em>hyperacusis</em> participants. We recruited 103 participants (52 female, 50 male, 1 non-binary) with a mean age of 27.5 years, divided into a <em>non-hyperacusis</em> group (<em>n</em> = 94) and a <em>hyperacusis</em> group (<em>n</em> = 9). Pure tone hearing thresholds (HTs) were measured from 0.25 to 16 kHz and LDLs were assessed at 0.5, 4, 9, 11.2, 12.5, 14 and 16 kHz. In <em>non-hyperacusis</em> participants, average EHF LDLs were of 74 dB HL (SD = 9.1–16.8; range = 10–100). LDLs showed small to medium negative correlations with the Hyperacusis Questionnaire (HQ), the Noise Sensitivity Scale (NSS) and the depression subscale of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, but no significant correlations with age or anxiety. <em>Hyperacusis</em> participants had significantly worse EHF average HTs, lower LDLs and reduced dynamic ranges across frequency ranges. This study provides the first report of LDLs for EHF in a large cohort and is a valuable reference for audiologists. These findings suggest that EHF measures could improve the diagnosis of loudness related disorders such as hyperacusis, supporting early identification and tailored interventions. Further research is needed to fully assess the clinical value of EHF LDL assessments.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12881,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hearing Research\",\"volume\":\"467 \",\"pages\":\"Article 109425\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hearing Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378595525002436\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hearing Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378595525002436","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Loudness discomfort levels at extended high frequencies in young adults: A potential marker of hyperacusis
Loudness discomfort levels (LDLs) are typically measured only at standard frequencies (0.25–8 kHz), which may limit their diagnostic utility in assessing loudness disorders such as hyperacusis. The aim of this study was to (1) establish normative LDL for extended high frequencies (EHFs, 9–16 kHz) in a non-hyperacusis population, (2) examine associations with participant audiological and demographic characteristics, and (3) explore EHFs LDLs in a small group of self-reported hyperacusis participants. We recruited 103 participants (52 female, 50 male, 1 non-binary) with a mean age of 27.5 years, divided into a non-hyperacusis group (n = 94) and a hyperacusis group (n = 9). Pure tone hearing thresholds (HTs) were measured from 0.25 to 16 kHz and LDLs were assessed at 0.5, 4, 9, 11.2, 12.5, 14 and 16 kHz. In non-hyperacusis participants, average EHF LDLs were of 74 dB HL (SD = 9.1–16.8; range = 10–100). LDLs showed small to medium negative correlations with the Hyperacusis Questionnaire (HQ), the Noise Sensitivity Scale (NSS) and the depression subscale of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, but no significant correlations with age or anxiety. Hyperacusis participants had significantly worse EHF average HTs, lower LDLs and reduced dynamic ranges across frequency ranges. This study provides the first report of LDLs for EHF in a large cohort and is a valuable reference for audiologists. These findings suggest that EHF measures could improve the diagnosis of loudness related disorders such as hyperacusis, supporting early identification and tailored interventions. Further research is needed to fully assess the clinical value of EHF LDL assessments.
期刊介绍:
The aim of the journal is to provide a forum for papers concerned with basic peripheral and central auditory mechanisms. Emphasis is on experimental and clinical studies, but theoretical and methodological papers will also be considered. The journal publishes original research papers, review and mini- review articles, rapid communications, method/protocol and perspective articles.
Papers submitted should deal with auditory anatomy, physiology, psychophysics, imaging, modeling and behavioural studies in animals and humans, as well as hearing aids and cochlear implants. Papers dealing with the vestibular system are also considered for publication. Papers on comparative aspects of hearing and on effects of drugs and environmental contaminants on hearing function will also be considered. Clinical papers will be accepted when they contribute to the understanding of normal and pathological hearing functions.