局部晚期非小细胞肺癌放化疗后原发性肿瘤衰竭:NRG -008的简要报告

IF 6.5 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
Cole Friedes, Nikhil Yegya-Raman, Michelle Iocolano, William P Levin, Keith A Cengel, Jeffrey D Bradley, Steven J Feigenberg
{"title":"局部晚期非小细胞肺癌放化疗后原发性肿瘤衰竭:NRG -008的简要报告","authors":"Cole Friedes, Nikhil Yegya-Raman, Michelle Iocolano, William P Levin, Keith A Cengel, Jeffrey D Bradley, Steven J Feigenberg","doi":"10.1016/j.ijrobp.2025.09.016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Locoregional failure (LRF) after definitive chemoradiation for locally advanced non-small cell cancer is suboptimal. LU-008 aims to improve local control through an stereotactic body radiation therapy boost. We quantified first-failure patterns after modern chemoradiation and determined whether patients with LRF had LU-008 eligibility.</p><p><strong>Methods and materials: </strong>Consecutive adults treated with definitive chemoradiation (>60 Gy, 1.8-2 Gy/fraction ± immunotherapy) from 2011 to 2021 at a single institution were reviewed. First progression was classified as isolated LRF, isolated distant failure (DF), or synchronous LRF + DF; LRF was subclassified as primary tumor failure (PTF), regional failure (RF), or PTF + RF. PTF was defined radiographically within the 90% isodose of the primary tumor gross tumor volume. LU-008 eligibility (tumor <7 cm, ≥1 node, primary >2 cm from nodal clinical tumor volume) was applied retrospectively. Cumulative incidence functions used Fine-Gray models with death as a competing risk.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 786 patients (median follow-up 66.9 months), 484 first failures occurred: 109 isolated LRF, 122 synchronous LRF + DF, and 253 isolated DF. Isolated PTF occurred in 40 patients (5.1%); PTF + RF in 29 (3.7%). Five-year cumulative incidence was 52% for any DF, 42% for any LRF, 25% for any isolated LRF (DF-free), 17% for any PTF (PTF + RF, DF-free), and 10% for isolated PTF. Only 28 of 69 PTF-containing LRFs (41%) met LU-008 criteria. Failure patterns were similar for patients who received immunotherapy consolidation. Overall, 129 of 231 patients with any LRF (56%) were LU-008-ineligible, commonly due to central or ultracentral primaries, and experienced earlier PTF (median, 12.1 vs 22.4 months; P = .002). PTF risk increased steeply with primary tumor gross tumor volume up to ∼200 cm<sup>2</sup>.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although DF is the most common site of failure, LRF remains a problem. Many PTFs after chemoradiation occur in patients who would be excluded from LU-008, mainly because of central-tumor location. This high-risk subset of central primaries may require alternative escalation or combined modality strategies beyond the proposed LU-008 paradigm.</p>","PeriodicalId":14215,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Primary Tumor Failure After Definitive Chemoradiation in Locally Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Brief Report on the Implications for NRG LU-008.\",\"authors\":\"Cole Friedes, Nikhil Yegya-Raman, Michelle Iocolano, William P Levin, Keith A Cengel, Jeffrey D Bradley, Steven J Feigenberg\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijrobp.2025.09.016\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Locoregional failure (LRF) after definitive chemoradiation for locally advanced non-small cell cancer is suboptimal. LU-008 aims to improve local control through an stereotactic body radiation therapy boost. We quantified first-failure patterns after modern chemoradiation and determined whether patients with LRF had LU-008 eligibility.</p><p><strong>Methods and materials: </strong>Consecutive adults treated with definitive chemoradiation (>60 Gy, 1.8-2 Gy/fraction ± immunotherapy) from 2011 to 2021 at a single institution were reviewed. First progression was classified as isolated LRF, isolated distant failure (DF), or synchronous LRF + DF; LRF was subclassified as primary tumor failure (PTF), regional failure (RF), or PTF + RF. PTF was defined radiographically within the 90% isodose of the primary tumor gross tumor volume. LU-008 eligibility (tumor <7 cm, ≥1 node, primary >2 cm from nodal clinical tumor volume) was applied retrospectively. Cumulative incidence functions used Fine-Gray models with death as a competing risk.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 786 patients (median follow-up 66.9 months), 484 first failures occurred: 109 isolated LRF, 122 synchronous LRF + DF, and 253 isolated DF. Isolated PTF occurred in 40 patients (5.1%); PTF + RF in 29 (3.7%). Five-year cumulative incidence was 52% for any DF, 42% for any LRF, 25% for any isolated LRF (DF-free), 17% for any PTF (PTF + RF, DF-free), and 10% for isolated PTF. Only 28 of 69 PTF-containing LRFs (41%) met LU-008 criteria. Failure patterns were similar for patients who received immunotherapy consolidation. Overall, 129 of 231 patients with any LRF (56%) were LU-008-ineligible, commonly due to central or ultracentral primaries, and experienced earlier PTF (median, 12.1 vs 22.4 months; P = .002). PTF risk increased steeply with primary tumor gross tumor volume up to ∼200 cm<sup>2</sup>.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although DF is the most common site of failure, LRF remains a problem. Many PTFs after chemoradiation occur in patients who would be excluded from LU-008, mainly because of central-tumor location. This high-risk subset of central primaries may require alternative escalation or combined modality strategies beyond the proposed LU-008 paradigm.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14215,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2025.09.016\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2025.09.016","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

局部晚期非小细胞癌(LA-NSCLC)的最终放化疗后局部区域失败(LRF)是次优的。LU-008旨在通过SBRT提升来改善本地控制。我们量化了现代放化疗后的首次失败模式,并确定LRF患者是否符合LU-008资格。方法:回顾2011-2021年在单一机构连续接受明确放化疗(≥60 Gy, 1.8-2 Gy/分数±免疫治疗)的成年人。首次进展分为孤立性LRF、孤立性DF或同步性LRF+DF;LRF可分为原发性肿瘤衰竭(PTF)、局部肿瘤衰竭(RF)或PTF+RF。PTF在原发肿瘤GTV的90%等剂量范围内进行放射学定义。回顾性应用LU-008资格(肿瘤< 7 cm,≥1个淋巴结,原发灶距淋巴结CTV 2 cm)。累积发生率函数使用带有死亡竞争风险的Fine-Gray模型。结果:在786例患者(中位随访66.9个月)中,484例首次失败:109例孤立性LRF, 122例同步LRF+DF, 253例孤立性DF。孤立性PTF 40例(5.1%);PTF+RF 29例(3.7%)。任何DF的5年累积发病率为52%,任何LRF为42%,任何孤立的LRF(无DF)为25%,任何PTF (PTF+RF,无DF)为17%,孤立的PTF为10%。69个含ptf的lrf中只有28个(41%)符合LU-008标准。接受免疫巩固治疗的患者的失败模式相似。总体而言,231例LRF患者中有129例(56%)不符合lu -008条件,通常是由于中枢性或超中枢性原发,并且经历过早期PTF(中位12.1 vs 22.4个月,p = 0.002)。原发性肿瘤GTV高达200 cc时,PTF风险急剧上升。结论:虽然DF是最常见的失败部位,但LRF仍然是一个问题。许多放化疗后ptf发生在将被排除在LU-008之外的患者中,主要是因为肿瘤位于中心位置。这种高风险的中心初选子集可能需要替代升级或联合模式策略,而不是建议的LU-008范式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Primary Tumor Failure After Definitive Chemoradiation in Locally Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Brief Report on the Implications for NRG LU-008.

Purpose: Locoregional failure (LRF) after definitive chemoradiation for locally advanced non-small cell cancer is suboptimal. LU-008 aims to improve local control through an stereotactic body radiation therapy boost. We quantified first-failure patterns after modern chemoradiation and determined whether patients with LRF had LU-008 eligibility.

Methods and materials: Consecutive adults treated with definitive chemoradiation (>60 Gy, 1.8-2 Gy/fraction ± immunotherapy) from 2011 to 2021 at a single institution were reviewed. First progression was classified as isolated LRF, isolated distant failure (DF), or synchronous LRF + DF; LRF was subclassified as primary tumor failure (PTF), regional failure (RF), or PTF + RF. PTF was defined radiographically within the 90% isodose of the primary tumor gross tumor volume. LU-008 eligibility (tumor <7 cm, ≥1 node, primary >2 cm from nodal clinical tumor volume) was applied retrospectively. Cumulative incidence functions used Fine-Gray models with death as a competing risk.

Results: Among 786 patients (median follow-up 66.9 months), 484 first failures occurred: 109 isolated LRF, 122 synchronous LRF + DF, and 253 isolated DF. Isolated PTF occurred in 40 patients (5.1%); PTF + RF in 29 (3.7%). Five-year cumulative incidence was 52% for any DF, 42% for any LRF, 25% for any isolated LRF (DF-free), 17% for any PTF (PTF + RF, DF-free), and 10% for isolated PTF. Only 28 of 69 PTF-containing LRFs (41%) met LU-008 criteria. Failure patterns were similar for patients who received immunotherapy consolidation. Overall, 129 of 231 patients with any LRF (56%) were LU-008-ineligible, commonly due to central or ultracentral primaries, and experienced earlier PTF (median, 12.1 vs 22.4 months; P = .002). PTF risk increased steeply with primary tumor gross tumor volume up to ∼200 cm2.

Conclusions: Although DF is the most common site of failure, LRF remains a problem. Many PTFs after chemoradiation occur in patients who would be excluded from LU-008, mainly because of central-tumor location. This high-risk subset of central primaries may require alternative escalation or combined modality strategies beyond the proposed LU-008 paradigm.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.00
自引率
7.10%
发文量
2538
审稿时长
6.6 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal of Radiation Oncology • Biology • Physics (IJROBP), known in the field as the Red Journal, publishes original laboratory and clinical investigations related to radiation oncology, radiation biology, medical physics, and both education and health policy as it relates to the field. This journal has a particular interest in original contributions of the following types: prospective clinical trials, outcomes research, and large database interrogation. In addition, it seeks reports of high-impact innovations in single or combined modality treatment, tumor sensitization, normal tissue protection (including both precision avoidance and pharmacologic means), brachytherapy, particle irradiation, and cancer imaging. Technical advances related to dosimetry and conformal radiation treatment planning are of interest, as are basic science studies investigating tumor physiology and the molecular biology underlying cancer and normal tissue radiation response.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信