胆囊癌切除术后的辅助放化疗与单独化疗:一项真实世界,基于iptw的队列研究。

IF 6.5 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
Qiuyi Zheng, Bei Lyu, Yixing Chen, Shujung Hsu, Yang Zhang, Siwei Wang, Houbao Liu, Tao Suo, Zhaochong Zeng, Shisuo Du
{"title":"胆囊癌切除术后的辅助放化疗与单独化疗:一项真实世界,基于iptw的队列研究。","authors":"Qiuyi Zheng, Bei Lyu, Yixing Chen, Shujung Hsu, Yang Zhang, Siwei Wang, Houbao Liu, Tao Suo, Zhaochong Zeng, Shisuo Du","doi":"10.1016/j.ijrobp.2025.09.023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) in patients with advanced resectable gallbladder carcinoma (GBC) receiving radical resection followed by chemoradiotherapy (S+CRT) or chemotherapy alone (S+CT).</p><p><strong>Methods and materials: </strong>This real-world study included 239 patients (pT2-4, N0-2, M0) treated between February 2017 and November 2021. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was applied to balance baseline variables between S+CRT and S+CT groups. Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox regression were used to evaluate survival. Predefined subgroups analyses were conducted for 77 patients with incidental GBC and 94 patients with nodal metastasis (pN+). Adverse events and recurrence patterns were recorded for the entire cohort.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Median follow-up was 57.4 months. IPTW created 472.6 weighted patients with well-balanced characteristics. S+CRT was associated with higher OS and DFS at 1, 3, and 5 years compared to S+CT (OS: 90.5%, 71.9%, 65.8% vs. 81.6%, 56.1%, 50.1%; DFS: 77.8%, 65.1%, 57.7% vs. 63.1%, 45.3%, 42.6%). Median OS and DFS were not reached in the S+CRT group. In the incidental GBC subgroup, survival differences were not statistically significant overall, but a landmark analysis beyond 24 months revealed improved OS favoring S+CRT (P=0.011). Similarly, in the subgroup with nodal metastasis (pN+), adjuvant CRT was associated with a significant improvement in DFS.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Postoperative CRT significantly improved OS and DFS in balanced patients with stage II-IV GBC. A delayed OS benefit was observed in patients with incidental GBC, while patients with nodal metastasis also experienced significantly improved DFS. Although intrahepatic recurrence remained predominant, CRT notably reduced local failures without significantly increasing treatment-related toxicity.</p>","PeriodicalId":14215,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Adjuvant Chemoradiotherapy Versus Chemotherapy Alone After Resection of Gallbladder Carcinoma: A Real-World, IPTW-Based Cohort Study.\",\"authors\":\"Qiuyi Zheng, Bei Lyu, Yixing Chen, Shujung Hsu, Yang Zhang, Siwei Wang, Houbao Liu, Tao Suo, Zhaochong Zeng, Shisuo Du\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijrobp.2025.09.023\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) in patients with advanced resectable gallbladder carcinoma (GBC) receiving radical resection followed by chemoradiotherapy (S+CRT) or chemotherapy alone (S+CT).</p><p><strong>Methods and materials: </strong>This real-world study included 239 patients (pT2-4, N0-2, M0) treated between February 2017 and November 2021. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was applied to balance baseline variables between S+CRT and S+CT groups. Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox regression were used to evaluate survival. Predefined subgroups analyses were conducted for 77 patients with incidental GBC and 94 patients with nodal metastasis (pN+). Adverse events and recurrence patterns were recorded for the entire cohort.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Median follow-up was 57.4 months. IPTW created 472.6 weighted patients with well-balanced characteristics. S+CRT was associated with higher OS and DFS at 1, 3, and 5 years compared to S+CT (OS: 90.5%, 71.9%, 65.8% vs. 81.6%, 56.1%, 50.1%; DFS: 77.8%, 65.1%, 57.7% vs. 63.1%, 45.3%, 42.6%). Median OS and DFS were not reached in the S+CRT group. In the incidental GBC subgroup, survival differences were not statistically significant overall, but a landmark analysis beyond 24 months revealed improved OS favoring S+CRT (P=0.011). Similarly, in the subgroup with nodal metastasis (pN+), adjuvant CRT was associated with a significant improvement in DFS.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Postoperative CRT significantly improved OS and DFS in balanced patients with stage II-IV GBC. A delayed OS benefit was observed in patients with incidental GBC, while patients with nodal metastasis also experienced significantly improved DFS. Although intrahepatic recurrence remained predominant, CRT notably reduced local failures without significantly increasing treatment-related toxicity.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14215,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2025.09.023\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2025.09.023","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:比较晚期可切除胆囊癌(GBC)根治后放化疗(S+CRT)或单纯化疗(S+CT)患者的总生存期(OS)和无病生存期(DFS)。方法和材料:这项现实世界的研究包括2017年2月至2021年11月期间接受治疗的239例患者(pT2-4, N0-2, M0)。应用治疗加权逆概率(IPTW)来平衡S+CRT组和S+CT组之间的基线变量。采用Kaplan-Meier分析和Cox回归评估生存率。对77例偶发GBC患者和94例淋巴结转移(pN+)患者进行预定义亚组分析。记录整个队列的不良事件和复发模式。结果:中位随访时间为57.4个月。IPTW创建了472.6名均衡特征良好的加权患者。与S+CT相比,S+CRT在1、3、5年的OS和DFS更高(OS: 90.5%、71.9%、65.8%比81.6%、56.1%、50.1%;DFS: 77.8%、65.1%、57.7%比63.1%、45.3%、42.6%)。S+CRT组中位OS和DFS均未达到。在附带的GBC亚组中,生存差异总体上没有统计学意义,但超过24个月的里程碑分析显示OS改善有利于S+CRT (P=0.011)。同样,在淋巴结转移亚组(pN+)中,辅助CRT与DFS的显着改善相关。结论:术后CRT可显著改善II-IV期GBC平衡患者的OS和DFS。在偶发GBC患者中观察到延迟的OS获益,而淋巴结转移患者也经历了显著改善的DFS。虽然肝内复发仍然是主要的,但CRT显着减少了局部失败,而没有显著增加治疗相关的毒性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Adjuvant Chemoradiotherapy Versus Chemotherapy Alone After Resection of Gallbladder Carcinoma: A Real-World, IPTW-Based Cohort Study.

Purpose: To compare overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) in patients with advanced resectable gallbladder carcinoma (GBC) receiving radical resection followed by chemoradiotherapy (S+CRT) or chemotherapy alone (S+CT).

Methods and materials: This real-world study included 239 patients (pT2-4, N0-2, M0) treated between February 2017 and November 2021. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was applied to balance baseline variables between S+CRT and S+CT groups. Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox regression were used to evaluate survival. Predefined subgroups analyses were conducted for 77 patients with incidental GBC and 94 patients with nodal metastasis (pN+). Adverse events and recurrence patterns were recorded for the entire cohort.

Results: Median follow-up was 57.4 months. IPTW created 472.6 weighted patients with well-balanced characteristics. S+CRT was associated with higher OS and DFS at 1, 3, and 5 years compared to S+CT (OS: 90.5%, 71.9%, 65.8% vs. 81.6%, 56.1%, 50.1%; DFS: 77.8%, 65.1%, 57.7% vs. 63.1%, 45.3%, 42.6%). Median OS and DFS were not reached in the S+CRT group. In the incidental GBC subgroup, survival differences were not statistically significant overall, but a landmark analysis beyond 24 months revealed improved OS favoring S+CRT (P=0.011). Similarly, in the subgroup with nodal metastasis (pN+), adjuvant CRT was associated with a significant improvement in DFS.

Conclusions: Postoperative CRT significantly improved OS and DFS in balanced patients with stage II-IV GBC. A delayed OS benefit was observed in patients with incidental GBC, while patients with nodal metastasis also experienced significantly improved DFS. Although intrahepatic recurrence remained predominant, CRT notably reduced local failures without significantly increasing treatment-related toxicity.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.00
自引率
7.10%
发文量
2538
审稿时长
6.6 weeks
期刊介绍: International Journal of Radiation Oncology • Biology • Physics (IJROBP), known in the field as the Red Journal, publishes original laboratory and clinical investigations related to radiation oncology, radiation biology, medical physics, and both education and health policy as it relates to the field. This journal has a particular interest in original contributions of the following types: prospective clinical trials, outcomes research, and large database interrogation. In addition, it seeks reports of high-impact innovations in single or combined modality treatment, tumor sensitization, normal tissue protection (including both precision avoidance and pharmacologic means), brachytherapy, particle irradiation, and cancer imaging. Technical advances related to dosimetry and conformal radiation treatment planning are of interest, as are basic science studies investigating tumor physiology and the molecular biology underlying cancer and normal tissue radiation response.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信