Emily Gore, Christopher Femino, Illya Aronskyy, Alexander Miller, Sara R Zelman, Michael W Winter, Michael T Dolinger
{"title":"炎症性肠病监测的即时肠超声患者体验:一项多中心研究。","authors":"Emily Gore, Christopher Femino, Illya Aronskyy, Alexander Miller, Sara R Zelman, Michael W Winter, Michael T Dolinger","doi":"10.1007/s10620-025-09390-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Intestinal ultrasound (IUS) is a non-invasive, accurate tool for monitoring inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), with growing adoption in the United States for real-time disease management within treat-to-target algorithms. While international studies highlight strong patient support for IUS, U.S.-based data on patient preferences and engagement are limited.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>This cross-sectional observational study, conducted at two academic IBD centers in the U.S., assessed patient experiences with IUS and preferences for disease monitoring.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Adults with Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC) seen for a routine visit were selected to undergo IUS-driven care or non-IUS-driven care, at the discretion of their provider. Participants then completed a 20-item survey, which included Likert scales for comparing disease-monitoring modalities, as well as measures of patient engagement (Patient Activation Measure (PAM-13), Morisky Medication Adherence Scale (MMAS-4)), and disease activity. Electronic health records were reviewed for clinical data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 326 patients (209 (64.1%) with CD; 117 (35.9%) with UC), 219 (67.2%) were IUS exposed (underwent IUS-driven care on the date of survey or previously) and 107 (32.8%) were IUS naïve. 133 (60.7%) IUS-exposed participants expressed a strong preference for IUS when comparing disease-monitoring modalities, with 153 (69.9%) reporting no discomfort. 225/326 (69.0%) expressed the strongest confidence in colonoscopy. 101 (46.1%) IUS-exposed participants expressed stronger confidence in IUS vs. blood work (96; 43.8%), stool studies (78; 35.6%), and other cross-sectional imaging (79; 36.1%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>IUS is highly acceptable, well tolerated, and preferred by our U.S.</p><p><strong>Population: </strong>These findings support the implementation of IUS as a patient-centric monitoring tool.</p>","PeriodicalId":11378,"journal":{"name":"Digestive Diseases and Sciences","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Patient Experience with Point-of-Care Intestinal Ultrasound for Inflammatory Bowel Disease Monitoring: A Multicenter Study.\",\"authors\":\"Emily Gore, Christopher Femino, Illya Aronskyy, Alexander Miller, Sara R Zelman, Michael W Winter, Michael T Dolinger\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10620-025-09390-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Intestinal ultrasound (IUS) is a non-invasive, accurate tool for monitoring inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), with growing adoption in the United States for real-time disease management within treat-to-target algorithms. While international studies highlight strong patient support for IUS, U.S.-based data on patient preferences and engagement are limited.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>This cross-sectional observational study, conducted at two academic IBD centers in the U.S., assessed patient experiences with IUS and preferences for disease monitoring.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Adults with Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC) seen for a routine visit were selected to undergo IUS-driven care or non-IUS-driven care, at the discretion of their provider. Participants then completed a 20-item survey, which included Likert scales for comparing disease-monitoring modalities, as well as measures of patient engagement (Patient Activation Measure (PAM-13), Morisky Medication Adherence Scale (MMAS-4)), and disease activity. Electronic health records were reviewed for clinical data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 326 patients (209 (64.1%) with CD; 117 (35.9%) with UC), 219 (67.2%) were IUS exposed (underwent IUS-driven care on the date of survey or previously) and 107 (32.8%) were IUS naïve. 133 (60.7%) IUS-exposed participants expressed a strong preference for IUS when comparing disease-monitoring modalities, with 153 (69.9%) reporting no discomfort. 225/326 (69.0%) expressed the strongest confidence in colonoscopy. 101 (46.1%) IUS-exposed participants expressed stronger confidence in IUS vs. blood work (96; 43.8%), stool studies (78; 35.6%), and other cross-sectional imaging (79; 36.1%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>IUS is highly acceptable, well tolerated, and preferred by our U.S.</p><p><strong>Population: </strong>These findings support the implementation of IUS as a patient-centric monitoring tool.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11378,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Digestive Diseases and Sciences\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Digestive Diseases and Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-025-09390-4\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Digestive Diseases and Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-025-09390-4","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
The Patient Experience with Point-of-Care Intestinal Ultrasound for Inflammatory Bowel Disease Monitoring: A Multicenter Study.
Background: Intestinal ultrasound (IUS) is a non-invasive, accurate tool for monitoring inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), with growing adoption in the United States for real-time disease management within treat-to-target algorithms. While international studies highlight strong patient support for IUS, U.S.-based data on patient preferences and engagement are limited.
Aims: This cross-sectional observational study, conducted at two academic IBD centers in the U.S., assessed patient experiences with IUS and preferences for disease monitoring.
Methods: Adults with Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC) seen for a routine visit were selected to undergo IUS-driven care or non-IUS-driven care, at the discretion of their provider. Participants then completed a 20-item survey, which included Likert scales for comparing disease-monitoring modalities, as well as measures of patient engagement (Patient Activation Measure (PAM-13), Morisky Medication Adherence Scale (MMAS-4)), and disease activity. Electronic health records were reviewed for clinical data.
Results: Of 326 patients (209 (64.1%) with CD; 117 (35.9%) with UC), 219 (67.2%) were IUS exposed (underwent IUS-driven care on the date of survey or previously) and 107 (32.8%) were IUS naïve. 133 (60.7%) IUS-exposed participants expressed a strong preference for IUS when comparing disease-monitoring modalities, with 153 (69.9%) reporting no discomfort. 225/326 (69.0%) expressed the strongest confidence in colonoscopy. 101 (46.1%) IUS-exposed participants expressed stronger confidence in IUS vs. blood work (96; 43.8%), stool studies (78; 35.6%), and other cross-sectional imaging (79; 36.1%).
Conclusion: IUS is highly acceptable, well tolerated, and preferred by our U.S.
Population: These findings support the implementation of IUS as a patient-centric monitoring tool.
期刊介绍:
Digestive Diseases and Sciences publishes high-quality, peer-reviewed, original papers addressing aspects of basic/translational and clinical research in gastroenterology, hepatology, and related fields. This well-illustrated journal features comprehensive coverage of basic pathophysiology, new technological advances, and clinical breakthroughs; insights from prominent academicians and practitioners concerning new scientific developments and practical medical issues; and discussions focusing on the latest changes in local and worldwide social, economic, and governmental policies that affect the delivery of care within the disciplines of gastroenterology and hepatology.