炎症性肠病监测的即时肠超声患者体验:一项多中心研究。

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Emily Gore, Christopher Femino, Illya Aronskyy, Alexander Miller, Sara R Zelman, Michael W Winter, Michael T Dolinger
{"title":"炎症性肠病监测的即时肠超声患者体验:一项多中心研究。","authors":"Emily Gore, Christopher Femino, Illya Aronskyy, Alexander Miller, Sara R Zelman, Michael W Winter, Michael T Dolinger","doi":"10.1007/s10620-025-09390-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Intestinal ultrasound (IUS) is a non-invasive, accurate tool for monitoring inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), with growing adoption in the United States for real-time disease management within treat-to-target algorithms. While international studies highlight strong patient support for IUS, U.S.-based data on patient preferences and engagement are limited.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>This cross-sectional observational study, conducted at two academic IBD centers in the U.S., assessed patient experiences with IUS and preferences for disease monitoring.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Adults with Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC) seen for a routine visit were selected to undergo IUS-driven care or non-IUS-driven care, at the discretion of their provider. Participants then completed a 20-item survey, which included Likert scales for comparing disease-monitoring modalities, as well as measures of patient engagement (Patient Activation Measure (PAM-13), Morisky Medication Adherence Scale (MMAS-4)), and disease activity. Electronic health records were reviewed for clinical data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 326 patients (209 (64.1%) with CD; 117 (35.9%) with UC), 219 (67.2%) were IUS exposed (underwent IUS-driven care on the date of survey or previously) and 107 (32.8%) were IUS naïve. 133 (60.7%) IUS-exposed participants expressed a strong preference for IUS when comparing disease-monitoring modalities, with 153 (69.9%) reporting no discomfort. 225/326 (69.0%) expressed the strongest confidence in colonoscopy. 101 (46.1%) IUS-exposed participants expressed stronger confidence in IUS vs. blood work (96; 43.8%), stool studies (78; 35.6%), and other cross-sectional imaging (79; 36.1%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>IUS is highly acceptable, well tolerated, and preferred by our U.S.</p><p><strong>Population: </strong>These findings support the implementation of IUS as a patient-centric monitoring tool.</p>","PeriodicalId":11378,"journal":{"name":"Digestive Diseases and Sciences","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Patient Experience with Point-of-Care Intestinal Ultrasound for Inflammatory Bowel Disease Monitoring: A Multicenter Study.\",\"authors\":\"Emily Gore, Christopher Femino, Illya Aronskyy, Alexander Miller, Sara R Zelman, Michael W Winter, Michael T Dolinger\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10620-025-09390-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Intestinal ultrasound (IUS) is a non-invasive, accurate tool for monitoring inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), with growing adoption in the United States for real-time disease management within treat-to-target algorithms. While international studies highlight strong patient support for IUS, U.S.-based data on patient preferences and engagement are limited.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>This cross-sectional observational study, conducted at two academic IBD centers in the U.S., assessed patient experiences with IUS and preferences for disease monitoring.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Adults with Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC) seen for a routine visit were selected to undergo IUS-driven care or non-IUS-driven care, at the discretion of their provider. Participants then completed a 20-item survey, which included Likert scales for comparing disease-monitoring modalities, as well as measures of patient engagement (Patient Activation Measure (PAM-13), Morisky Medication Adherence Scale (MMAS-4)), and disease activity. Electronic health records were reviewed for clinical data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 326 patients (209 (64.1%) with CD; 117 (35.9%) with UC), 219 (67.2%) were IUS exposed (underwent IUS-driven care on the date of survey or previously) and 107 (32.8%) were IUS naïve. 133 (60.7%) IUS-exposed participants expressed a strong preference for IUS when comparing disease-monitoring modalities, with 153 (69.9%) reporting no discomfort. 225/326 (69.0%) expressed the strongest confidence in colonoscopy. 101 (46.1%) IUS-exposed participants expressed stronger confidence in IUS vs. blood work (96; 43.8%), stool studies (78; 35.6%), and other cross-sectional imaging (79; 36.1%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>IUS is highly acceptable, well tolerated, and preferred by our U.S.</p><p><strong>Population: </strong>These findings support the implementation of IUS as a patient-centric monitoring tool.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11378,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Digestive Diseases and Sciences\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Digestive Diseases and Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-025-09390-4\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Digestive Diseases and Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10620-025-09390-4","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:肠道超声(IUS)是监测炎症性肠病(IBD)的一种非侵入性、准确的工具,在美国越来越多地采用治疗-目标算法中的实时疾病管理。虽然国际研究强调患者对IUS的强烈支持,但美国基于患者偏好和参与的数据有限。目的:这项横断面观察性研究在美国的两个IBD学术中心进行,评估了患者使用IUS的经历和疾病监测的偏好。方法:选择克罗恩病(CD)和溃疡性结肠炎(UC)的成人进行常规就诊,由其提供者自行决定接受ius驱动的护理或非ius驱动的护理。然后,参与者完成了一项20项的调查,其中包括用于比较疾病监测模式的李克特量表,以及患者参与的测量(患者激活测量(pam13), Morisky药物依从性量表(MMAS-4))和疾病活动性。审查了电子健康记录的临床数据。结果:326例CD患者中,209例(64.1%);117例(35.9%)患有UC, 219例(67.2%)暴露于IUS(在调查当日或之前接受过IUS驱动的护理),107例(32.8%)患有IUS naïve。133名(60.7%)暴露于IUS的参与者在比较疾病监测方式时表达了对IUS的强烈偏好,153名(69.9%)报告没有不适。225/326(69.0%)对结肠镜检查信心最强。101名(46.1%)暴露于IUS的参与者对IUS比血液检查(96名;43.8%)、粪便检查(78名;35.6%)和其他横断面成像(79名;36.1%)表现出更强的信心。结论:IUS是高度可接受的,耐受性良好,并且是美国人群的首选:这些发现支持将IUS作为以患者为中心的监测工具的实施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Patient Experience with Point-of-Care Intestinal Ultrasound for Inflammatory Bowel Disease Monitoring: A Multicenter Study.

Background: Intestinal ultrasound (IUS) is a non-invasive, accurate tool for monitoring inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), with growing adoption in the United States for real-time disease management within treat-to-target algorithms. While international studies highlight strong patient support for IUS, U.S.-based data on patient preferences and engagement are limited.

Aims: This cross-sectional observational study, conducted at two academic IBD centers in the U.S., assessed patient experiences with IUS and preferences for disease monitoring.

Methods: Adults with Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC) seen for a routine visit were selected to undergo IUS-driven care or non-IUS-driven care, at the discretion of their provider. Participants then completed a 20-item survey, which included Likert scales for comparing disease-monitoring modalities, as well as measures of patient engagement (Patient Activation Measure (PAM-13), Morisky Medication Adherence Scale (MMAS-4)), and disease activity. Electronic health records were reviewed for clinical data.

Results: Of 326 patients (209 (64.1%) with CD; 117 (35.9%) with UC), 219 (67.2%) were IUS exposed (underwent IUS-driven care on the date of survey or previously) and 107 (32.8%) were IUS naïve. 133 (60.7%) IUS-exposed participants expressed a strong preference for IUS when comparing disease-monitoring modalities, with 153 (69.9%) reporting no discomfort. 225/326 (69.0%) expressed the strongest confidence in colonoscopy. 101 (46.1%) IUS-exposed participants expressed stronger confidence in IUS vs. blood work (96; 43.8%), stool studies (78; 35.6%), and other cross-sectional imaging (79; 36.1%).

Conclusion: IUS is highly acceptable, well tolerated, and preferred by our U.S.

Population: These findings support the implementation of IUS as a patient-centric monitoring tool.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Digestive Diseases and Sciences
Digestive Diseases and Sciences 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
3.20%
发文量
420
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Digestive Diseases and Sciences publishes high-quality, peer-reviewed, original papers addressing aspects of basic/translational and clinical research in gastroenterology, hepatology, and related fields. This well-illustrated journal features comprehensive coverage of basic pathophysiology, new technological advances, and clinical breakthroughs; insights from prominent academicians and practitioners concerning new scientific developments and practical medical issues; and discussions focusing on the latest changes in local and worldwide social, economic, and governmental policies that affect the delivery of care within the disciplines of gastroenterology and hepatology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信