Mahmoud Balata, Marc Ulrich Becher, Marwa Hassan, Mohamed Rady, Shady Rashed, Usama Alkomi, Marian Christoph, Karim Ibrahim, Akram Youssef
{"title":"恩格列净与达格列净对心力衰竭患者左心室重构的影响:一项为期1年的比较研究","authors":"Mahmoud Balata, Marc Ulrich Becher, Marwa Hassan, Mohamed Rady, Shady Rashed, Usama Alkomi, Marian Christoph, Karim Ibrahim, Akram Youssef","doi":"10.1002/clc.70192","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2is) reduce cardiovascular mortality and heart failure (HF)-related hospitalizations in HF patients. However, the mechanisms underlying these benefits remain unclear, and it is uncertain whether empagliflozin and dapagliflozin have differential effects on cardiac structure and function.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aim</h3>\n \n <p>This study aims to compare the effects of these two SGLT2is on left ventricular echocardiographic parameters in HF patients over 1 year.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This retrospective study included 558 consecutive HF patients newly prescribed either dapagliflozin or empagliflozin. Key echocardiographic parameters, such as peak E-wave velocity, E/e' ratio, left atrial volume index (LAVI), LV end-diastolic and end-systolic volumes (LV-EDVI, LV-ESVI), LV mass index (LV-MI), relative wall thickness (RWT), LV sphericity index (LV-SI), and ejection fraction (LVEF), were measured at baseline and after 1 year.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>At 1-year, significant reductions were observed only in the empagliflozin group for peak E-wave velocity (mean difference = −12.76 cm/s, 95% CI: −16.26 to −9.27, <i>p</i> < 0.001), E/e' ratio (mean difference = −3.04, 95% CI: −4.17 to −1.91, <i>p</i> < 0.001), and LV sphericity index (LV-SI; mean difference = −0.01, 95% CI: −0.02 to −0.0005, <i>p</i> = 0.040). Both SGLT2is significantly improved E-wave deceleration time, LAVI, LV-EDVI, LV-ESVI, LV-MI, and LVEF. Neither medication produced significant changes in RWT, and no significant differences were noted between groups regarding HF hospitalizations or all-cause mortality.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Empagliflozin demonstrated more pronounced effects on LV remodeling markers, including peak E-wave velocity, E/e' ratio, and LV-SI, compared to dapagliflozin. These findings suggest potential efficacy differences between SGLT2is, highlighting the need for future randomized comparative studies.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":10201,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Cardiology","volume":"48 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12445616/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of Empagliflozin Versus Dapagliflozin on Left Ventricular Remodeling in Heart Failure Patients: A 1-Year Comparative Study\",\"authors\":\"Mahmoud Balata, Marc Ulrich Becher, Marwa Hassan, Mohamed Rady, Shady Rashed, Usama Alkomi, Marian Christoph, Karim Ibrahim, Akram Youssef\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/clc.70192\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2is) reduce cardiovascular mortality and heart failure (HF)-related hospitalizations in HF patients. However, the mechanisms underlying these benefits remain unclear, and it is uncertain whether empagliflozin and dapagliflozin have differential effects on cardiac structure and function.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Aim</h3>\\n \\n <p>This study aims to compare the effects of these two SGLT2is on left ventricular echocardiographic parameters in HF patients over 1 year.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>This retrospective study included 558 consecutive HF patients newly prescribed either dapagliflozin or empagliflozin. Key echocardiographic parameters, such as peak E-wave velocity, E/e' ratio, left atrial volume index (LAVI), LV end-diastolic and end-systolic volumes (LV-EDVI, LV-ESVI), LV mass index (LV-MI), relative wall thickness (RWT), LV sphericity index (LV-SI), and ejection fraction (LVEF), were measured at baseline and after 1 year.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>At 1-year, significant reductions were observed only in the empagliflozin group for peak E-wave velocity (mean difference = −12.76 cm/s, 95% CI: −16.26 to −9.27, <i>p</i> < 0.001), E/e' ratio (mean difference = −3.04, 95% CI: −4.17 to −1.91, <i>p</i> < 0.001), and LV sphericity index (LV-SI; mean difference = −0.01, 95% CI: −0.02 to −0.0005, <i>p</i> = 0.040). Both SGLT2is significantly improved E-wave deceleration time, LAVI, LV-EDVI, LV-ESVI, LV-MI, and LVEF. Neither medication produced significant changes in RWT, and no significant differences were noted between groups regarding HF hospitalizations or all-cause mortality.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>Empagliflozin demonstrated more pronounced effects on LV remodeling markers, including peak E-wave velocity, E/e' ratio, and LV-SI, compared to dapagliflozin. These findings suggest potential efficacy differences between SGLT2is, highlighting the need for future randomized comparative studies.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10201,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Cardiology\",\"volume\":\"48 9\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12445616/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Cardiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/clc.70192\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/clc.70192","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Impact of Empagliflozin Versus Dapagliflozin on Left Ventricular Remodeling in Heart Failure Patients: A 1-Year Comparative Study
Background
Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2is) reduce cardiovascular mortality and heart failure (HF)-related hospitalizations in HF patients. However, the mechanisms underlying these benefits remain unclear, and it is uncertain whether empagliflozin and dapagliflozin have differential effects on cardiac structure and function.
Aim
This study aims to compare the effects of these two SGLT2is on left ventricular echocardiographic parameters in HF patients over 1 year.
Methods
This retrospective study included 558 consecutive HF patients newly prescribed either dapagliflozin or empagliflozin. Key echocardiographic parameters, such as peak E-wave velocity, E/e' ratio, left atrial volume index (LAVI), LV end-diastolic and end-systolic volumes (LV-EDVI, LV-ESVI), LV mass index (LV-MI), relative wall thickness (RWT), LV sphericity index (LV-SI), and ejection fraction (LVEF), were measured at baseline and after 1 year.
Results
At 1-year, significant reductions were observed only in the empagliflozin group for peak E-wave velocity (mean difference = −12.76 cm/s, 95% CI: −16.26 to −9.27, p < 0.001), E/e' ratio (mean difference = −3.04, 95% CI: −4.17 to −1.91, p < 0.001), and LV sphericity index (LV-SI; mean difference = −0.01, 95% CI: −0.02 to −0.0005, p = 0.040). Both SGLT2is significantly improved E-wave deceleration time, LAVI, LV-EDVI, LV-ESVI, LV-MI, and LVEF. Neither medication produced significant changes in RWT, and no significant differences were noted between groups regarding HF hospitalizations or all-cause mortality.
Conclusion
Empagliflozin demonstrated more pronounced effects on LV remodeling markers, including peak E-wave velocity, E/e' ratio, and LV-SI, compared to dapagliflozin. These findings suggest potential efficacy differences between SGLT2is, highlighting the need for future randomized comparative studies.
期刊介绍:
Clinical Cardiology provides a fully Gold Open Access forum for the publication of original clinical research, as well as brief reviews of diagnostic and therapeutic issues in cardiovascular medicine and cardiovascular surgery.
The journal includes Clinical Investigations, Reviews, free standing editorials and commentaries, and bonus online-only content.
The journal also publishes supplements, Expert Panel Discussions, sponsored clinical Reviews, Trial Designs, and Quality and Outcomes.