Schawanya K Rattanapitoon, Nav La, Chadaporn N Gordon, Nathkapach K Rattanapitoon
{"title":"超越安全:重新评估自主性、感染风险和多腔肠外营养在癌症治疗中的长期价值。","authors":"Schawanya K Rattanapitoon, Nav La, Chadaporn N Gordon, Nathkapach K Rattanapitoon","doi":"10.1016/j.clnesp.2025.09.015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We commend Goetze et al. for evaluating multi-chamber parenteral nutrition (PN) in solid tumor patients requiring home PN. Their study demonstrates improved patient autonomy and fewer PN-related adverse events, yet several limitations remain. First, the premature termination reduces statistical power, especially for infection outcomes. Second, autonomy was defined inclusively, counting family support as self-administration, which may overestimate practical independence. Third, the economic implications of higher upfront costs versus potential savings from fewer nursing visits and complications remain unclear. Finally, survival benefits were not demonstrated, underscoring the need to assess quality of life and patient-reported outcomes. Future trials should integrate cost-effectiveness and long-term endpoints to guide wider adoption.</p>","PeriodicalId":10352,"journal":{"name":"Clinical nutrition ESPEN","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Beyond safety: Reassessing autonomy, infection risk, and long-term value of multi-chamber parenteral nutrition in cancer care.\",\"authors\":\"Schawanya K Rattanapitoon, Nav La, Chadaporn N Gordon, Nathkapach K Rattanapitoon\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.clnesp.2025.09.015\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>We commend Goetze et al. for evaluating multi-chamber parenteral nutrition (PN) in solid tumor patients requiring home PN. Their study demonstrates improved patient autonomy and fewer PN-related adverse events, yet several limitations remain. First, the premature termination reduces statistical power, especially for infection outcomes. Second, autonomy was defined inclusively, counting family support as self-administration, which may overestimate practical independence. Third, the economic implications of higher upfront costs versus potential savings from fewer nursing visits and complications remain unclear. Finally, survival benefits were not demonstrated, underscoring the need to assess quality of life and patient-reported outcomes. Future trials should integrate cost-effectiveness and long-term endpoints to guide wider adoption.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10352,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical nutrition ESPEN\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical nutrition ESPEN\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clnesp.2025.09.015\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"NUTRITION & DIETETICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical nutrition ESPEN","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clnesp.2025.09.015","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Beyond safety: Reassessing autonomy, infection risk, and long-term value of multi-chamber parenteral nutrition in cancer care.
We commend Goetze et al. for evaluating multi-chamber parenteral nutrition (PN) in solid tumor patients requiring home PN. Their study demonstrates improved patient autonomy and fewer PN-related adverse events, yet several limitations remain. First, the premature termination reduces statistical power, especially for infection outcomes. Second, autonomy was defined inclusively, counting family support as self-administration, which may overestimate practical independence. Third, the economic implications of higher upfront costs versus potential savings from fewer nursing visits and complications remain unclear. Finally, survival benefits were not demonstrated, underscoring the need to assess quality of life and patient-reported outcomes. Future trials should integrate cost-effectiveness and long-term endpoints to guide wider adoption.
期刊介绍:
Clinical Nutrition ESPEN is an electronic-only journal and is an official publication of the European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism (ESPEN). Nutrition and nutritional care have gained wide clinical and scientific interest during the past decades. The increasing knowledge of metabolic disturbances and nutritional assessment in chronic and acute diseases has stimulated rapid advances in design, development and clinical application of nutritional support. The aims of ESPEN are to encourage the rapid diffusion of knowledge and its application in the field of clinical nutrition and metabolism. Published bimonthly, Clinical Nutrition ESPEN focuses on publishing articles on the relationship between nutrition and disease in the setting of basic science and clinical practice. Clinical Nutrition ESPEN is available to all members of ESPEN and to all subscribers of Clinical Nutrition.