临床实验室错误检测的数据分析。

IF 5.5 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY
Clarence W Chan
{"title":"临床实验室错误检测的数据分析。","authors":"Clarence W Chan","doi":"10.1080/10408363.2025.2555261","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Errors inevitably occur in the practice of laboratory medicine. A cornerstone of clinical laboratory quality management is the detection of erroneous results and the assessment of imprecision, bias, and other performance limitations of clinical test methods, particularly those affecting patient care. Errors can arise in each of what has been conventionally regarded as the three key phases of testing: pre-analytical, analytical, and post-analytical. In this review, both the standard concepts and methods of quantifying uncertainty and error are introduced in the context of clinical laboratory operations. Method validation and verification studies are presented as opportunities for preemptive and anticipatory error assessment-before tests are implemented for patient testing. Quality control monitoring is a key internal quality assurance strategy, whereas proficiency testing forms the basis of most external quality assurance initiatives. Data analytic approaches for error detection are reviewed, highlighting quantitative and statistical concepts on which they are based, and emerging machine learning and artificial intelligence algorithms are presented as contemporary tools currently under development for error detection in the clinical laboratory.</p>","PeriodicalId":10760,"journal":{"name":"Critical reviews in clinical laboratory sciences","volume":" ","pages":"1-17"},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Data analytics for error detection in clinical laboratories.\",\"authors\":\"Clarence W Chan\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10408363.2025.2555261\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Errors inevitably occur in the practice of laboratory medicine. A cornerstone of clinical laboratory quality management is the detection of erroneous results and the assessment of imprecision, bias, and other performance limitations of clinical test methods, particularly those affecting patient care. Errors can arise in each of what has been conventionally regarded as the three key phases of testing: pre-analytical, analytical, and post-analytical. In this review, both the standard concepts and methods of quantifying uncertainty and error are introduced in the context of clinical laboratory operations. Method validation and verification studies are presented as opportunities for preemptive and anticipatory error assessment-before tests are implemented for patient testing. Quality control monitoring is a key internal quality assurance strategy, whereas proficiency testing forms the basis of most external quality assurance initiatives. Data analytic approaches for error detection are reviewed, highlighting quantitative and statistical concepts on which they are based, and emerging machine learning and artificial intelligence algorithms are presented as contemporary tools currently under development for error detection in the clinical laboratory.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10760,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Critical reviews in clinical laboratory sciences\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-17\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Critical reviews in clinical laboratory sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10408363.2025.2555261\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical reviews in clinical laboratory sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10408363.2025.2555261","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在检验医学实践中,错误是不可避免的。临床实验室质量管理的基石是发现错误结果,评估临床检测方法的不精确性、偏倚和其他性能限制,特别是那些影响患者护理的结果。错误可能出现在传统上被认为是测试的三个关键阶段:分析前、分析后和分析后。本文介绍了临床实验室操作中不确定度和误差量化的标准概念和方法。方法验证和验证研究是在实施患者测试之前进行先发制人和预期错误评估的机会。质量控制监控是一个关键的内部质量保证策略,而能力测试构成了大多数外部质量保证计划的基础。回顾了用于错误检测的数据分析方法,突出了它们所基于的定量和统计概念,并将新兴的机器学习和人工智能算法呈现为目前正在开发的用于临床实验室错误检测的当代工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Data analytics for error detection in clinical laboratories.

Errors inevitably occur in the practice of laboratory medicine. A cornerstone of clinical laboratory quality management is the detection of erroneous results and the assessment of imprecision, bias, and other performance limitations of clinical test methods, particularly those affecting patient care. Errors can arise in each of what has been conventionally regarded as the three key phases of testing: pre-analytical, analytical, and post-analytical. In this review, both the standard concepts and methods of quantifying uncertainty and error are introduced in the context of clinical laboratory operations. Method validation and verification studies are presented as opportunities for preemptive and anticipatory error assessment-before tests are implemented for patient testing. Quality control monitoring is a key internal quality assurance strategy, whereas proficiency testing forms the basis of most external quality assurance initiatives. Data analytic approaches for error detection are reviewed, highlighting quantitative and statistical concepts on which they are based, and emerging machine learning and artificial intelligence algorithms are presented as contemporary tools currently under development for error detection in the clinical laboratory.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
20.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Critical Reviews in Clinical Laboratory Sciences publishes comprehensive and high quality review articles in all areas of clinical laboratory science, including clinical biochemistry, hematology, microbiology, pathology, transfusion medicine, genetics, immunology and molecular diagnostics. The reviews critically evaluate the status of current issues in the selected areas, with a focus on clinical laboratory diagnostics and latest advances. The adjective “critical” implies a balanced synthesis of results and conclusions that are frequently contradictory and controversial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信