Benson S Chen, Stéphanie Perot, Magali Taiel, Patrick Yu-Wai-Man, Mike Horton
{"title":"NEI-VFQ-25的Rasch分析:lenadogene nolparvovec基因治疗后Leber遗传性视神经病变的视力相关生活质量。","authors":"Benson S Chen, Stéphanie Perot, Magali Taiel, Patrick Yu-Wai-Man, Mike Horton","doi":"10.1136/bmjophth-2025-002164","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the suitability of the National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire (NEI-VFQ-25) for measuring vision-related quality of life (VRQoL) in patients with Leber hereditary optic neuropathy receiving lenadogene nolparvovec gene therapy in three Phase III randomised controlled clinical trials.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>VRQoL was assessed using the NEI-VFQ-25 at baseline (n=174) and 2 years after treatment (n=152). All participants received lenadogene nolparvovec in at least one eye. The scoring structure of the original NEI-VFQ-25 was evaluated for fit to the Rasch model, and a post hoc revision was created and psychometrically reevaluated. Stacked analysis was conducted to compare Rasch-revised scores at baseline and 2 years after treatment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The original NEI-VFQ-25 exhibited multiple issues including limitations in response functioning and scale dimensionality. These issues were rectified by revising the NEI-VFQ25 into two separate unidimensional scales measuring 'Vision-related Activity Limitation' (VAL) and 'Socioemotional Functioning' (SEF). Participants' mean VAL score at baseline on a Rasch-transformed 0-100 scale was 46.1 (11.7), improving to 48.4 (13.7) after treatment (<i>F</i>(1, 324) = 2.67, p=0.103). On the SEF scale, there was a significant difference 2 years after treatment, with participants improving from a mean score of 40.1 (14.1) at baseline to 49.6 (17.6) (<i>F</i>(1, 324) = 29.1, p<0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The scoring structure of the original NEI-VFQ-25 has limitations that undermine its psychometric validity as a measure of VRQoL. Using the Rasch-revised NEI-VFQ-25, we determined that improvement in VRQoL after treatment with lenadogene nolparvovec was driven predominantly by an improvement in socioemotional functioning.</p>","PeriodicalId":9286,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open Ophthalmology","volume":"10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12458720/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Rasch analysis of the NEI-VFQ-25: vision-related quality of life in Leber hereditary optic neuropathy after lenadogene nolparvovec gene therapy.\",\"authors\":\"Benson S Chen, Stéphanie Perot, Magali Taiel, Patrick Yu-Wai-Man, Mike Horton\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/bmjophth-2025-002164\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to evaluate the suitability of the National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire (NEI-VFQ-25) for measuring vision-related quality of life (VRQoL) in patients with Leber hereditary optic neuropathy receiving lenadogene nolparvovec gene therapy in three Phase III randomised controlled clinical trials.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>VRQoL was assessed using the NEI-VFQ-25 at baseline (n=174) and 2 years after treatment (n=152). All participants received lenadogene nolparvovec in at least one eye. The scoring structure of the original NEI-VFQ-25 was evaluated for fit to the Rasch model, and a post hoc revision was created and psychometrically reevaluated. Stacked analysis was conducted to compare Rasch-revised scores at baseline and 2 years after treatment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The original NEI-VFQ-25 exhibited multiple issues including limitations in response functioning and scale dimensionality. These issues were rectified by revising the NEI-VFQ25 into two separate unidimensional scales measuring 'Vision-related Activity Limitation' (VAL) and 'Socioemotional Functioning' (SEF). Participants' mean VAL score at baseline on a Rasch-transformed 0-100 scale was 46.1 (11.7), improving to 48.4 (13.7) after treatment (<i>F</i>(1, 324) = 2.67, p=0.103). On the SEF scale, there was a significant difference 2 years after treatment, with participants improving from a mean score of 40.1 (14.1) at baseline to 49.6 (17.6) (<i>F</i>(1, 324) = 29.1, p<0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The scoring structure of the original NEI-VFQ-25 has limitations that undermine its psychometric validity as a measure of VRQoL. Using the Rasch-revised NEI-VFQ-25, we determined that improvement in VRQoL after treatment with lenadogene nolparvovec was driven predominantly by an improvement in socioemotional functioning.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9286,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMJ Open Ophthalmology\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12458720/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMJ Open Ophthalmology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjophth-2025-002164\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjophth-2025-002164","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Rasch analysis of the NEI-VFQ-25: vision-related quality of life in Leber hereditary optic neuropathy after lenadogene nolparvovec gene therapy.
Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the suitability of the National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire (NEI-VFQ-25) for measuring vision-related quality of life (VRQoL) in patients with Leber hereditary optic neuropathy receiving lenadogene nolparvovec gene therapy in three Phase III randomised controlled clinical trials.
Methods: VRQoL was assessed using the NEI-VFQ-25 at baseline (n=174) and 2 years after treatment (n=152). All participants received lenadogene nolparvovec in at least one eye. The scoring structure of the original NEI-VFQ-25 was evaluated for fit to the Rasch model, and a post hoc revision was created and psychometrically reevaluated. Stacked analysis was conducted to compare Rasch-revised scores at baseline and 2 years after treatment.
Results: The original NEI-VFQ-25 exhibited multiple issues including limitations in response functioning and scale dimensionality. These issues were rectified by revising the NEI-VFQ25 into two separate unidimensional scales measuring 'Vision-related Activity Limitation' (VAL) and 'Socioemotional Functioning' (SEF). Participants' mean VAL score at baseline on a Rasch-transformed 0-100 scale was 46.1 (11.7), improving to 48.4 (13.7) after treatment (F(1, 324) = 2.67, p=0.103). On the SEF scale, there was a significant difference 2 years after treatment, with participants improving from a mean score of 40.1 (14.1) at baseline to 49.6 (17.6) (F(1, 324) = 29.1, p<0.001).
Conclusions: The scoring structure of the original NEI-VFQ-25 has limitations that undermine its psychometric validity as a measure of VRQoL. Using the Rasch-revised NEI-VFQ-25, we determined that improvement in VRQoL after treatment with lenadogene nolparvovec was driven predominantly by an improvement in socioemotional functioning.