一种快速诊断试验的发展,以区分引起出血热的新出现的病毒。

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Andrew Wilson, Heather Poeck-Goux, Madison Ruschaupt, Scott Olschner, Keersten M Ricks, Darci R Smith
{"title":"一种快速诊断试验的发展,以区分引起出血热的新出现的病毒。","authors":"Andrew Wilson, Heather Poeck-Goux, Madison Ruschaupt, Scott Olschner, Keersten M Ricks, Darci R Smith","doi":"10.4269/ajtmh.25-0168","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Viruses that cause the clinical syndrome referred to as viral hemorrhagic fever (VHF) are responsible for numerous infectious disease outbreaks. High-priority emerging viruses include orthoebolaviruses, orthomarburgviruses, Lassa virus, Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever virus, Rift Valley fever virus (RVFV), dengue virus (DENV), and yellow fever virus (YFV). Many of these viruses cause a similar clinical presentation in infected humans and have an overlapping geographic distribution with a risk of coemergence. As such, an antigen rapid diagnostic test to distinguish between these viruses would be beneficial in low-resource settings. In this study, we developed single-plex and multiplex antigen detection lateral flow immunoassays (LFIs) to rapidly detect and distinguish between emerging viruses that can cause VHF. We evaluated two antibody-labeling methods, colloidal gold nanoparticles and cellulose nanobeads (CNBs), to determine which approach would increase assay performance and multiplexing capabilities. Assay performance was evaluated by determining their sensitivity, specificity, matrix evaluation, and stability testing. All assays were highly specific, with no crossreactivity observed for the single-plex assays. Several of the assays performed better with the CNBs, including the DENV, YFV, RVFV, and orthomarburgvirus LFIs. No matrix effect was observed with most of the assays except that serum did impact the RVFV and DENV assays. In general, the multiplex assays were less sensitive compared with their respective single-plex assay. The most successful assays were the single-plex CNB LFIs assembled into an eight-plex cartridge, which allows for rapid and simultaneous testing of antigen to seven viruses.</p>","PeriodicalId":7752,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development of a Rapid Diagnostic Test to Distinguish between Emerging Viruses That Cause Hemorrhagic Fever.\",\"authors\":\"Andrew Wilson, Heather Poeck-Goux, Madison Ruschaupt, Scott Olschner, Keersten M Ricks, Darci R Smith\",\"doi\":\"10.4269/ajtmh.25-0168\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Viruses that cause the clinical syndrome referred to as viral hemorrhagic fever (VHF) are responsible for numerous infectious disease outbreaks. High-priority emerging viruses include orthoebolaviruses, orthomarburgviruses, Lassa virus, Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever virus, Rift Valley fever virus (RVFV), dengue virus (DENV), and yellow fever virus (YFV). Many of these viruses cause a similar clinical presentation in infected humans and have an overlapping geographic distribution with a risk of coemergence. As such, an antigen rapid diagnostic test to distinguish between these viruses would be beneficial in low-resource settings. In this study, we developed single-plex and multiplex antigen detection lateral flow immunoassays (LFIs) to rapidly detect and distinguish between emerging viruses that can cause VHF. We evaluated two antibody-labeling methods, colloidal gold nanoparticles and cellulose nanobeads (CNBs), to determine which approach would increase assay performance and multiplexing capabilities. Assay performance was evaluated by determining their sensitivity, specificity, matrix evaluation, and stability testing. All assays were highly specific, with no crossreactivity observed for the single-plex assays. Several of the assays performed better with the CNBs, including the DENV, YFV, RVFV, and orthomarburgvirus LFIs. No matrix effect was observed with most of the assays except that serum did impact the RVFV and DENV assays. In general, the multiplex assays were less sensitive compared with their respective single-plex assay. The most successful assays were the single-plex CNB LFIs assembled into an eight-plex cartridge, which allows for rapid and simultaneous testing of antigen to seven viruses.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7752,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4269/ajtmh.25-0168\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4269/ajtmh.25-0168","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

引起病毒性出血热(VHF)临床综合征的病毒是许多传染病爆发的原因。高优先级新发病毒包括正埃博拉病毒、正马尔堡病毒、拉沙病毒、克里米亚-刚果出血热病毒、裂谷热病毒、登革热病毒和黄热病病毒。其中许多病毒在受感染者中引起相似的临床表现,并且具有重叠的地理分布,具有共同出现的风险。因此,在资源匮乏的环境中,抗原快速诊断试验区分这些病毒将是有益的。在这项研究中,我们开发了单一和多重抗原检测侧流免疫测定法(lfi)来快速检测和区分可引起甚高频的新出现病毒。我们评估了两种抗体标记方法,胶体金纳米颗粒和纤维素纳米颗粒(CNBs),以确定哪种方法可以提高检测性能和多路复用能力。通过测定其敏感性、特异性、基质评价和稳定性测试来评价分析性能。所有的检测都是高度特异性的,没有观察到单组分检测的交叉反应。几种检测方法在CNBs中表现较好,包括DENV、YFV、RVFV和正马尔堡病毒lfi。除了血清对裂谷热病毒和登革热病毒检测有影响外,大多数检测没有观察到基质效应。总的来说,多重测定法的敏感性低于它们各自的单一测定法。最成功的检测方法是将单组分CNB lfi组装到一个8组分的药筒中,可以同时快速检测7种病毒的抗原。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Development of a Rapid Diagnostic Test to Distinguish between Emerging Viruses That Cause Hemorrhagic Fever.

Viruses that cause the clinical syndrome referred to as viral hemorrhagic fever (VHF) are responsible for numerous infectious disease outbreaks. High-priority emerging viruses include orthoebolaviruses, orthomarburgviruses, Lassa virus, Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever virus, Rift Valley fever virus (RVFV), dengue virus (DENV), and yellow fever virus (YFV). Many of these viruses cause a similar clinical presentation in infected humans and have an overlapping geographic distribution with a risk of coemergence. As such, an antigen rapid diagnostic test to distinguish between these viruses would be beneficial in low-resource settings. In this study, we developed single-plex and multiplex antigen detection lateral flow immunoassays (LFIs) to rapidly detect and distinguish between emerging viruses that can cause VHF. We evaluated two antibody-labeling methods, colloidal gold nanoparticles and cellulose nanobeads (CNBs), to determine which approach would increase assay performance and multiplexing capabilities. Assay performance was evaluated by determining their sensitivity, specificity, matrix evaluation, and stability testing. All assays were highly specific, with no crossreactivity observed for the single-plex assays. Several of the assays performed better with the CNBs, including the DENV, YFV, RVFV, and orthomarburgvirus LFIs. No matrix effect was observed with most of the assays except that serum did impact the RVFV and DENV assays. In general, the multiplex assays were less sensitive compared with their respective single-plex assay. The most successful assays were the single-plex CNB LFIs assembled into an eight-plex cartridge, which allows for rapid and simultaneous testing of antigen to seven viruses.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
3.00%
发文量
508
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, established in 1921, is published monthly by the American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene. It is among the top-ranked tropical medicine journals in the world publishing original scientific articles and the latest science covering new research with an emphasis on population, clinical and laboratory science and the application of technology in the fields of tropical medicine, parasitology, immunology, infectious diseases, epidemiology, basic and molecular biology, virology and international medicine. The Journal publishes unsolicited peer-reviewed manuscripts, review articles, short reports, images in Clinical Tropical Medicine, case studies, reports on the efficacy of new drugs and methods of treatment, prevention and control methodologies,new testing methods and equipment, book reports and Letters to the Editor. Topics range from applied epidemiology in such relevant areas as AIDS to the molecular biology of vaccine development. The Journal is of interest to epidemiologists, parasitologists, virologists, clinicians, entomologists and public health officials who are concerned with health issues of the tropics, developing nations and emerging infectious diseases. Major granting institutions including philanthropic and governmental institutions active in the public health field, and medical and scientific libraries throughout the world purchase the Journal. Two or more supplements to the Journal on topics of special interest are published annually. These supplements represent comprehensive and multidisciplinary discussions of issues of concern to tropical disease specialists and health issues of developing countries
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信