早期神经肌肉电刺激治疗急性缺血性脑卒中肩臂麻痹的有效性和安全性——准实验研究。

IF 2.4 Q4 NEUROSCIENCES
Shahnawaz Ahmad, Varun Kumar Singh, Rameshwar Nath Chaurasia, Vijay Nath Mishra, Abhishek Pathak, Anand Kumar, Deepika Joshi, Girish Singh
{"title":"早期神经肌肉电刺激治疗急性缺血性脑卒中肩臂麻痹的有效性和安全性——准实验研究。","authors":"Shahnawaz Ahmad, Varun Kumar Singh, Rameshwar Nath Chaurasia, Vijay Nath Mishra, Abhishek Pathak, Anand Kumar, Deepika Joshi, Girish Singh","doi":"10.1177/09727531251365376","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Shoulder subluxation and shoulder pain are frequent after a stroke. Neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) has been used widely in the sub-acute and chronic stages, but its use in the early stage is infrequent.</p><p><strong>Aims and objectives: </strong>The study's objective is to see the effect of early neuromuscular electrical stimulation on hand function, shoulder subluxation, and shoulder pain after three months of stroke.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study included 60 acute ischaemic stroke survivors. The intervention group received early NMES with standard rehabilitation, whereas the control group only received standard rehabilitation. The assessment was done at baseline and three months follow-up. The outcome measures were the presence of a sulcus sign, the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS), the Fugl-Meyer Assessment-Upper Extremity (FMA-UE, sub-scale A and A-D) and the Motor Activity Log (MAL) (sub-scale HOW WELL and AMOUNT).</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>The intervention group had eight patients and the control group had nine patients with shoulder subluxation at follow-up. Hand functional outcomes were significantly better in the intervention group compared to the control group, with the FMA-UE-A scores of 27 (19-36) versus 18.5 (4.7-24.75), <i>p</i> = .007 and FMA-UE-A-D scores of 28.5 (4-48.25) versus 7.5 (4-23.75), <i>p</i> = .011. The HOW WELL and AMOUNT scores also showed significant differences, with 90 (30-150) versus 30 (0-90), <i>p</i> = .027. The intervention group did not experience any adverse events related to NMES.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The application of early NMES prevents shoulder subluxation and improves hand function. Randomised control trials with larger sample sizes and additional treatment sessions are needed to generalise the results.</p>","PeriodicalId":7921,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Neurosciences","volume":" ","pages":"09727531251365376"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12440905/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy and Safety of Early Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation on Shoulder and Arm Paresis in Patients of Acute Ischaemic Stroke-A Quasi-experimental Study.\",\"authors\":\"Shahnawaz Ahmad, Varun Kumar Singh, Rameshwar Nath Chaurasia, Vijay Nath Mishra, Abhishek Pathak, Anand Kumar, Deepika Joshi, Girish Singh\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/09727531251365376\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Shoulder subluxation and shoulder pain are frequent after a stroke. Neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) has been used widely in the sub-acute and chronic stages, but its use in the early stage is infrequent.</p><p><strong>Aims and objectives: </strong>The study's objective is to see the effect of early neuromuscular electrical stimulation on hand function, shoulder subluxation, and shoulder pain after three months of stroke.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study included 60 acute ischaemic stroke survivors. The intervention group received early NMES with standard rehabilitation, whereas the control group only received standard rehabilitation. The assessment was done at baseline and three months follow-up. The outcome measures were the presence of a sulcus sign, the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS), the Fugl-Meyer Assessment-Upper Extremity (FMA-UE, sub-scale A and A-D) and the Motor Activity Log (MAL) (sub-scale HOW WELL and AMOUNT).</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>The intervention group had eight patients and the control group had nine patients with shoulder subluxation at follow-up. Hand functional outcomes were significantly better in the intervention group compared to the control group, with the FMA-UE-A scores of 27 (19-36) versus 18.5 (4.7-24.75), <i>p</i> = .007 and FMA-UE-A-D scores of 28.5 (4-48.25) versus 7.5 (4-23.75), <i>p</i> = .011. The HOW WELL and AMOUNT scores also showed significant differences, with 90 (30-150) versus 30 (0-90), <i>p</i> = .027. The intervention group did not experience any adverse events related to NMES.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The application of early NMES prevents shoulder subluxation and improves hand function. Randomised control trials with larger sample sizes and additional treatment sessions are needed to generalise the results.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7921,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Neurosciences\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"09727531251365376\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12440905/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Neurosciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/09727531251365376\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Neurosciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/09727531251365376","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:中风后肩部半脱位和肩部疼痛是常见的。神经肌肉电刺激(NMES)已广泛应用于亚急性和慢性阶段,但其在早期的应用是罕见的。目的和目的:该研究的目的是观察早期神经肌肉电刺激对手部功能、肩部半脱位和中风三个月后肩部疼痛的影响。方法:本研究纳入60例急性缺血性脑卒中幸存者。干预组给予早期NMES伴标准康复治疗,对照组仅给予标准康复治疗。评估在基线和三个月的随访中进行。结果测量为是否存在沟征、数值评定量表(NRS)、Fugl-Meyer上肢评估(FMA-UE,子量表a和a - d)和运动活动日志(MAL)(子量表HOW WELL和AMOUNT)。结果:干预组随访8例,对照组随访9例。干预组手功能指标明显优于对照组,FMA-UE-A评分为27(19-36)比18.5 (4.7-24.75),p = 0.007; FMA-UE-A- d评分为28.5(4-48.25)比7.5 (4-23.75),p = 0.011。HOW WELL和AMOUNT得分也有显著差异,分别为90分(30-150)和30分(0-90),p = 0.027。干预组未发生任何与NMES相关的不良事件。结论:早期应用NMES可预防肩关节半脱位,改善手部功能。需要更大样本量的随机对照试验和额外的治疗时间来推广结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Efficacy and Safety of Early Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation on Shoulder and Arm Paresis in Patients of Acute Ischaemic Stroke-A Quasi-experimental Study.

Background: Shoulder subluxation and shoulder pain are frequent after a stroke. Neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) has been used widely in the sub-acute and chronic stages, but its use in the early stage is infrequent.

Aims and objectives: The study's objective is to see the effect of early neuromuscular electrical stimulation on hand function, shoulder subluxation, and shoulder pain after three months of stroke.

Methods: This study included 60 acute ischaemic stroke survivors. The intervention group received early NMES with standard rehabilitation, whereas the control group only received standard rehabilitation. The assessment was done at baseline and three months follow-up. The outcome measures were the presence of a sulcus sign, the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS), the Fugl-Meyer Assessment-Upper Extremity (FMA-UE, sub-scale A and A-D) and the Motor Activity Log (MAL) (sub-scale HOW WELL and AMOUNT).

Result: The intervention group had eight patients and the control group had nine patients with shoulder subluxation at follow-up. Hand functional outcomes were significantly better in the intervention group compared to the control group, with the FMA-UE-A scores of 27 (19-36) versus 18.5 (4.7-24.75), p = .007 and FMA-UE-A-D scores of 28.5 (4-48.25) versus 7.5 (4-23.75), p = .011. The HOW WELL and AMOUNT scores also showed significant differences, with 90 (30-150) versus 30 (0-90), p = .027. The intervention group did not experience any adverse events related to NMES.

Conclusion: The application of early NMES prevents shoulder subluxation and improves hand function. Randomised control trials with larger sample sizes and additional treatment sessions are needed to generalise the results.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of Neurosciences
Annals of Neurosciences NEUROSCIENCES-
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
39
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信