农药配方对作物初始残留水平的影响:一项荟萃分析方法

IF 7.3 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
So-Hee Kim , Hye-Ran Eun , Min-Seok Kim , Hyun-Woo Kim , Ji Won Lee , Hyun Ho Noh
{"title":"农药配方对作物初始残留水平的影响:一项荟萃分析方法","authors":"So-Hee Kim ,&nbsp;Hye-Ran Eun ,&nbsp;Min-Seok Kim ,&nbsp;Hyun-Woo Kim ,&nbsp;Ji Won Lee ,&nbsp;Hyun Ho Noh","doi":"10.1016/j.envpol.2025.127140","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>A meta-analysis was conducted to determine whether pesticide formulation significantly affects the initial residue levels across different crops. Data from pesticide registration trials for three vegetable crops, four fruit crops, and one cereal crop were sourced from the Agricultural Materials Evaluation System database of the Rural Development Administration. After applying inclusion and exclusion criteria, 296 trials for lettuce, 113 for perilla leaves, 232 for green onions, 94 for apples, 206 for peaches, 230 for plums, 75 for apricots, and 144 for brown rice were selected. For each crop, trials using a specific formulation were grouped, the mean residue level and standard deviation were calculated for each group, and the residues from different formulations were then compared within the same crop. The standardized mean difference (SMD) was calculated for each crop using Hedges' <em>g</em>, and study heterogeneity was assessed using Cochran's Q-test and Higgins' I<sup>2</sup>-statistic. The Q values ranged from 1.91 to 12.59 (p &gt; 0.13), and I<sup>2</sup> values remained below 38 %, indicating no significant heterogeneity. A common effect model was then applied, yielding SMDs between 1.088 and 1.525 (95 % confidence interval). Funnel plots and Egger's test confirmed the absence of publication bias. In conclusion, the results showed that variations in pesticide formulation do not significantly affect initial residue levels in crops. The methodology and findings of this meta-analysis may support further investigation into the residual behavior of pesticides and the factors influencing pesticide residues in various crops.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":311,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Pollution","volume":"385 ","pages":"Article 127140"},"PeriodicalIF":7.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of pesticide formulation on initial residue levels in crops: a meta-analysis approach\",\"authors\":\"So-Hee Kim ,&nbsp;Hye-Ran Eun ,&nbsp;Min-Seok Kim ,&nbsp;Hyun-Woo Kim ,&nbsp;Ji Won Lee ,&nbsp;Hyun Ho Noh\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.envpol.2025.127140\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>A meta-analysis was conducted to determine whether pesticide formulation significantly affects the initial residue levels across different crops. Data from pesticide registration trials for three vegetable crops, four fruit crops, and one cereal crop were sourced from the Agricultural Materials Evaluation System database of the Rural Development Administration. After applying inclusion and exclusion criteria, 296 trials for lettuce, 113 for perilla leaves, 232 for green onions, 94 for apples, 206 for peaches, 230 for plums, 75 for apricots, and 144 for brown rice were selected. For each crop, trials using a specific formulation were grouped, the mean residue level and standard deviation were calculated for each group, and the residues from different formulations were then compared within the same crop. The standardized mean difference (SMD) was calculated for each crop using Hedges' <em>g</em>, and study heterogeneity was assessed using Cochran's Q-test and Higgins' I<sup>2</sup>-statistic. The Q values ranged from 1.91 to 12.59 (p &gt; 0.13), and I<sup>2</sup> values remained below 38 %, indicating no significant heterogeneity. A common effect model was then applied, yielding SMDs between 1.088 and 1.525 (95 % confidence interval). Funnel plots and Egger's test confirmed the absence of publication bias. In conclusion, the results showed that variations in pesticide formulation do not significantly affect initial residue levels in crops. The methodology and findings of this meta-analysis may support further investigation into the residual behavior of pesticides and the factors influencing pesticide residues in various crops.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":311,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental Pollution\",\"volume\":\"385 \",\"pages\":\"Article 127140\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental Pollution\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0269749125015143\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Pollution","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0269749125015143","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

进行了一项荟萃分析,以确定农药配方是否显著影响不同作物的初始残留水平。三种蔬菜作物、四种水果作物和一种谷类作物的农药登记试验数据来源于农村发展局的农业资料评价系统数据库。根据纳入和排除标准,莴苣296项、紫苏叶113项、大葱232项、苹果94项、桃子206项、李子230项、杏75项、糙米144项。对于每种作物,使用特定配方的试验进行分组,计算每组的平均残留水平和标准差,然后在同一作物内比较不同配方的残留物。采用Hedges ' g计算各作物的标准化平均差(SMD),采用Cochran ' s q检验和Higgins ' 2统计量评估研究异质性。Q值在1.91 ~ 12.59之间(p > 0.13), I2值保持在38%以下,异质性不显著。然后应用共同效应模型,得出smd在1.088和1.525之间(95%置信区间)。漏斗图和Egger检验证实了没有发表偏倚。综上所述,农药配方的变化对作物的初始残留水平没有显著影响。本荟萃分析的方法和结果可为进一步研究不同作物中农药残留行为和影响农药残留的因素提供支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Effect of pesticide formulation on initial residue levels in crops: a meta-analysis approach

Effect of pesticide formulation on initial residue levels in crops: a meta-analysis approach

Effect of pesticide formulation on initial residue levels in crops: a meta-analysis approach
A meta-analysis was conducted to determine whether pesticide formulation significantly affects the initial residue levels across different crops. Data from pesticide registration trials for three vegetable crops, four fruit crops, and one cereal crop were sourced from the Agricultural Materials Evaluation System database of the Rural Development Administration. After applying inclusion and exclusion criteria, 296 trials for lettuce, 113 for perilla leaves, 232 for green onions, 94 for apples, 206 for peaches, 230 for plums, 75 for apricots, and 144 for brown rice were selected. For each crop, trials using a specific formulation were grouped, the mean residue level and standard deviation were calculated for each group, and the residues from different formulations were then compared within the same crop. The standardized mean difference (SMD) was calculated for each crop using Hedges' g, and study heterogeneity was assessed using Cochran's Q-test and Higgins' I2-statistic. The Q values ranged from 1.91 to 12.59 (p > 0.13), and I2 values remained below 38 %, indicating no significant heterogeneity. A common effect model was then applied, yielding SMDs between 1.088 and 1.525 (95 % confidence interval). Funnel plots and Egger's test confirmed the absence of publication bias. In conclusion, the results showed that variations in pesticide formulation do not significantly affect initial residue levels in crops. The methodology and findings of this meta-analysis may support further investigation into the residual behavior of pesticides and the factors influencing pesticide residues in various crops.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Environmental Pollution
Environmental Pollution 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
16.00
自引率
6.70%
发文量
2082
审稿时长
2.9 months
期刊介绍: Environmental Pollution is an international peer-reviewed journal that publishes high-quality research papers and review articles covering all aspects of environmental pollution and its impacts on ecosystems and human health. Subject areas include, but are not limited to: • Sources and occurrences of pollutants that are clearly defined and measured in environmental compartments, food and food-related items, and human bodies; • Interlinks between contaminant exposure and biological, ecological, and human health effects, including those of climate change; • Contaminants of emerging concerns (including but not limited to antibiotic resistant microorganisms or genes, microplastics/nanoplastics, electronic wastes, light, and noise) and/or their biological, ecological, or human health effects; • Laboratory and field studies on the remediation/mitigation of environmental pollution via new techniques and with clear links to biological, ecological, or human health effects; • Modeling of pollution processes, patterns, or trends that is of clear environmental and/or human health interest; • New techniques that measure and examine environmental occurrences, transport, behavior, and effects of pollutants within the environment or the laboratory, provided that they can be clearly used to address problems within regional or global environmental compartments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信