种植前的选择影响了线虫附着的细菌群落,减少了大麦根部的叶柄线虫入侵

IF 4 2区 生物学 Q2 MICROBIOLOGY
Ahmed Elhady, Xorla Kanfra, Shimaa Adss, Holger Heuer
{"title":"种植前的选择影响了线虫附着的细菌群落,减少了大麦根部的叶柄线虫入侵","authors":"Ahmed Elhady,&nbsp;Xorla Kanfra,&nbsp;Shimaa Adss,&nbsp;Holger Heuer","doi":"10.1111/1462-2920.70179","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Soil microbiomes play a crucial role in plant–parasitic nematode suppression; however, the influence of plant–soil interactions remains unclear. This study examines plant–soil feedback effects on microbiomes attached to the cuticle of <i>Pratylenchus penetrans</i> in winter barley. We tested whether bacterial drivers of nematode suppression remain conserved across plant hosts or exhibit host specificity. Surface-sterilised <i>P. penetrans</i> were baited in different soils and rhizospheres, and their attached bacterial communities were analysed. Fallow and rhizosphere microbiomes from reduced <i>P. penetrans</i> invasion in barley, and suppression strength varied by plant species. Only the maize and Ethiopian mustard microbiomes inhibited invasion relative to other microbiomes and to surface-sterilised nematodes. By contrast, association with the oat microbiome did not reduce <i>P. penetrans</i> invasion of barley roots. The suppression of <i>P. penetrans</i> invasion relied on the cuticle-associated bacteria, with maize showing a distinct assembly rich in Proteobacteria and Firmicutes. Suppressive cuticle-associated bacteria differed between nematodes exposed to maize-derived and Ethiopian mustard-derived rhizosphere microbiomes from the same soil. Specific bacterial genera associated with reduced invasion included <i>Chryseobacterium</i>, <i>Duganella</i>, <i>Streptomyces</i>, <i>Asticcacaulis</i>, <i>Pseudomonas</i>, and members of Enterobacteriaceae. These results indicate that crop rotation and cover crop choices could steer nematode-associated microbiomes toward communities that prevent root invasion.</p>","PeriodicalId":11898,"journal":{"name":"Environmental microbiology","volume":"27 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://enviromicro-journals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1462-2920.70179","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Pre-Crop Choice Shapes Nematode-Attached Bacterial Communities Associated With Reduced Pratylenchus penetrans Invasion of Barley Roots\",\"authors\":\"Ahmed Elhady,&nbsp;Xorla Kanfra,&nbsp;Shimaa Adss,&nbsp;Holger Heuer\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/1462-2920.70179\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Soil microbiomes play a crucial role in plant–parasitic nematode suppression; however, the influence of plant–soil interactions remains unclear. This study examines plant–soil feedback effects on microbiomes attached to the cuticle of <i>Pratylenchus penetrans</i> in winter barley. We tested whether bacterial drivers of nematode suppression remain conserved across plant hosts or exhibit host specificity. Surface-sterilised <i>P. penetrans</i> were baited in different soils and rhizospheres, and their attached bacterial communities were analysed. Fallow and rhizosphere microbiomes from reduced <i>P. penetrans</i> invasion in barley, and suppression strength varied by plant species. Only the maize and Ethiopian mustard microbiomes inhibited invasion relative to other microbiomes and to surface-sterilised nematodes. By contrast, association with the oat microbiome did not reduce <i>P. penetrans</i> invasion of barley roots. The suppression of <i>P. penetrans</i> invasion relied on the cuticle-associated bacteria, with maize showing a distinct assembly rich in Proteobacteria and Firmicutes. Suppressive cuticle-associated bacteria differed between nematodes exposed to maize-derived and Ethiopian mustard-derived rhizosphere microbiomes from the same soil. Specific bacterial genera associated with reduced invasion included <i>Chryseobacterium</i>, <i>Duganella</i>, <i>Streptomyces</i>, <i>Asticcacaulis</i>, <i>Pseudomonas</i>, and members of Enterobacteriaceae. These results indicate that crop rotation and cover crop choices could steer nematode-associated microbiomes toward communities that prevent root invasion.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11898,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental microbiology\",\"volume\":\"27 9\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://enviromicro-journals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1462-2920.70179\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental microbiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://enviromicro-journals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1462-2920.70179\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MICROBIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental microbiology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://enviromicro-journals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1462-2920.70179","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

土壤微生物组在植物寄生线虫抑制中起着至关重要的作用;然而,植物-土壤相互作用的影响尚不清楚。本研究探讨了植物-土壤反馈对冬大麦中渗透Pratylenchus表皮附着微生物群的影响。我们测试了线虫抑制的细菌驱动因素是否在植物宿主中保持保守或表现出宿主特异性。在不同土壤和根际中诱捕表面灭菌的穿透性假单胞菌,并对其附着菌群进行了分析。大麦休耕区和根际微生物群对穿透性假单胞菌的抑制强度因植物种类而异。相对于其他微生物组和表面绝育的线虫,只有玉米和埃塞俄比亚芥末微生物组抑制入侵。相比之下,与燕麦微生物组的关联并没有减少穿透性假单胞菌对大麦根的入侵。对渗透假单胞菌入侵的抑制依赖于角质层相关细菌,玉米显示出丰富的变形菌门和厚壁菌门的独特组合。暴露于同一土壤中玉米源根际微生物群和埃塞俄比亚芥源根际微生物群的线虫之间的抑制角质层相关细菌存在差异。与减少入侵相关的特定细菌属包括黄杆菌、杜氏菌、链霉菌、Asticcacaulis、假单胞菌和肠杆菌科成员。这些结果表明,作物轮作和覆盖作物的选择可以将线虫相关的微生物群引向防止根系入侵的群落。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Pre-Crop Choice Shapes Nematode-Attached Bacterial Communities Associated With Reduced Pratylenchus penetrans Invasion of Barley Roots

Pre-Crop Choice Shapes Nematode-Attached Bacterial Communities Associated With Reduced Pratylenchus penetrans Invasion of Barley Roots

Pre-Crop Choice Shapes Nematode-Attached Bacterial Communities Associated With Reduced Pratylenchus penetrans Invasion of Barley Roots

Pre-Crop Choice Shapes Nematode-Attached Bacterial Communities Associated With Reduced Pratylenchus penetrans Invasion of Barley Roots

Pre-Crop Choice Shapes Nematode-Attached Bacterial Communities Associated With Reduced Pratylenchus penetrans Invasion of Barley Roots

Pre-Crop Choice Shapes Nematode-Attached Bacterial Communities Associated With Reduced Pratylenchus penetrans Invasion of Barley Roots

Soil microbiomes play a crucial role in plant–parasitic nematode suppression; however, the influence of plant–soil interactions remains unclear. This study examines plant–soil feedback effects on microbiomes attached to the cuticle of Pratylenchus penetrans in winter barley. We tested whether bacterial drivers of nematode suppression remain conserved across plant hosts or exhibit host specificity. Surface-sterilised P. penetrans were baited in different soils and rhizospheres, and their attached bacterial communities were analysed. Fallow and rhizosphere microbiomes from reduced P. penetrans invasion in barley, and suppression strength varied by plant species. Only the maize and Ethiopian mustard microbiomes inhibited invasion relative to other microbiomes and to surface-sterilised nematodes. By contrast, association with the oat microbiome did not reduce P. penetrans invasion of barley roots. The suppression of P. penetrans invasion relied on the cuticle-associated bacteria, with maize showing a distinct assembly rich in Proteobacteria and Firmicutes. Suppressive cuticle-associated bacteria differed between nematodes exposed to maize-derived and Ethiopian mustard-derived rhizosphere microbiomes from the same soil. Specific bacterial genera associated with reduced invasion included Chryseobacterium, Duganella, Streptomyces, Asticcacaulis, Pseudomonas, and members of Enterobacteriaceae. These results indicate that crop rotation and cover crop choices could steer nematode-associated microbiomes toward communities that prevent root invasion.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Environmental microbiology
Environmental microbiology 环境科学-微生物学
CiteScore
9.90
自引率
3.90%
发文量
427
审稿时长
2.3 months
期刊介绍: Environmental Microbiology provides a high profile vehicle for publication of the most innovative, original and rigorous research in the field. The scope of the Journal encompasses the diversity of current research on microbial processes in the environment, microbial communities, interactions and evolution and includes, but is not limited to, the following: the structure, activities and communal behaviour of microbial communities microbial community genetics and evolutionary processes microbial symbioses, microbial interactions and interactions with plants, animals and abiotic factors microbes in the tree of life, microbial diversification and evolution population biology and clonal structure microbial metabolic and structural diversity microbial physiology, growth and survival microbes and surfaces, adhesion and biofouling responses to environmental signals and stress factors modelling and theory development pollution microbiology extremophiles and life in extreme and unusual little-explored habitats element cycles and biogeochemical processes, primary and secondary production microbes in a changing world, microbially-influenced global changes evolution and diversity of archaeal and bacterial viruses new technological developments in microbial ecology and evolution, in particular for the study of activities of microbial communities, non-culturable microorganisms and emerging pathogens
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信