导航器:经导管主动脉瓣植入与导航平台在双尖解剖。

Omar A Oliva, Enrico Criscione, Matteo Casenghi, Davorka Lulic, Andrea Zuffi, Federico De Marco, Emanuele Barbato, Luca Testa, Francesco Bedogni, Ole De Backer, Nicolas Dumonteil, Didier Tchétché, Chiara De Biase
{"title":"导航器:经导管主动脉瓣植入与导航平台在双尖解剖。","authors":"Omar A Oliva, Enrico Criscione, Matteo Casenghi, Davorka Lulic, Andrea Zuffi, Federico De Marco, Emanuele Barbato, Luca Testa, Francesco Bedogni, Ole De Backer, Nicolas Dumonteil, Didier Tchétché, Chiara De Biase","doi":"10.1002/ccd.70186","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) for the treatment of bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) is still debated. Although several registries reported favorable outcomes with various transcatheter heart valves (THV) in BAV, there is no published data on the Navitor platform.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To provide preliminary data on the efficacy and the safety of the Navitor valve in BAV.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively included patients who underwent TAVI using the Navitor valve (Abbott, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA) for severe aortic stenosis in BAV anatomies, from October 2021 until August 2024. Patients were enrolled at six high TAVI volume centers. The endpoints were procedural device success and early safety, according to the VARC-3 criteria.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 47 patients were included in this registry. The mean age was 83.7 ± 7.9, and 66% of the patients were women. Bicuspid type 1 L-R fusion (72.3%) was the dominant anatomical subtype. A high device success rate was achieved: 91.5% in-hospital and 91.1% at 30-day follow-up, while early safety was 70.2% in-hospital and 66.7% at 30 days. No 30-day prosthesis-patient mismatch (PPM) and no ≥moderate paravalvular regurgitation (PVR) were observed at 30 days; meanwhile, rates of permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI) were not negligible (23.4% in-hospital and 26.7% at 30-day follow-up).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The Navitor THV appears to be a safe and effective treatment option for patients with severe bicuspid aortic stenosis. Larger registries and comparison with different platforms are required to validate these outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":520583,"journal":{"name":"Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The NavigIIster: Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation With the Navitor Platform in Bicuspid Anatomy.\",\"authors\":\"Omar A Oliva, Enrico Criscione, Matteo Casenghi, Davorka Lulic, Andrea Zuffi, Federico De Marco, Emanuele Barbato, Luca Testa, Francesco Bedogni, Ole De Backer, Nicolas Dumonteil, Didier Tchétché, Chiara De Biase\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ccd.70186\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) for the treatment of bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) is still debated. Although several registries reported favorable outcomes with various transcatheter heart valves (THV) in BAV, there is no published data on the Navitor platform.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>To provide preliminary data on the efficacy and the safety of the Navitor valve in BAV.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively included patients who underwent TAVI using the Navitor valve (Abbott, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA) for severe aortic stenosis in BAV anatomies, from October 2021 until August 2024. Patients were enrolled at six high TAVI volume centers. The endpoints were procedural device success and early safety, according to the VARC-3 criteria.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 47 patients were included in this registry. The mean age was 83.7 ± 7.9, and 66% of the patients were women. Bicuspid type 1 L-R fusion (72.3%) was the dominant anatomical subtype. A high device success rate was achieved: 91.5% in-hospital and 91.1% at 30-day follow-up, while early safety was 70.2% in-hospital and 66.7% at 30 days. No 30-day prosthesis-patient mismatch (PPM) and no ≥moderate paravalvular regurgitation (PVR) were observed at 30 days; meanwhile, rates of permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI) were not negligible (23.4% in-hospital and 26.7% at 30-day follow-up).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The Navitor THV appears to be a safe and effective treatment option for patients with severe bicuspid aortic stenosis. Larger registries and comparison with different platforms are required to validate these outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":520583,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.70186\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.70186","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:经导管主动脉瓣植入术(TAVI)治疗双尖瓣主动脉瓣(BAV)仍有争议。虽然有几个注册报告了各种经导管心脏瓣膜(THV)治疗BAV的有利结果,但在Navitor平台上没有发表的数据。目的:初步探讨Navitor瓣膜在BAV治疗中的有效性和安全性。方法:从2021年10月至2024年8月,我们回顾性地纳入了使用Navitor瓣膜(Abbott, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA)治疗BAV解剖中严重主动脉狭窄的TAVI患者。患者被纳入6个高TAVI容量中心。终点是程序性器械成功和早期安全性,根据VARC-3标准。结果:共纳入47例患者。平均年龄83.7±7.9岁,女性占66%。双尖1型L-R融合(72.3%)是主要的解剖亚型。器械成功率高:住院91.5%,随访30天91.1%,早期安全性为住院70.2%,随访30天66.7%。30 d无假体-患者错配(PPM), 30 d无≥中度瓣旁反流(PVR);同时,永久性起搏器植入率(PPI)也不容忽视(住院23.4%,30天随访26.7%)。结论:Navitor THV似乎是严重二尖瓣主动脉狭窄患者安全有效的治疗选择。需要更大的注册表和与不同平台的比较来验证这些结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The NavigIIster: Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation With the Navitor Platform in Bicuspid Anatomy.

Background: Transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) for the treatment of bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) is still debated. Although several registries reported favorable outcomes with various transcatheter heart valves (THV) in BAV, there is no published data on the Navitor platform.

Aims: To provide preliminary data on the efficacy and the safety of the Navitor valve in BAV.

Methods: We retrospectively included patients who underwent TAVI using the Navitor valve (Abbott, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA) for severe aortic stenosis in BAV anatomies, from October 2021 until August 2024. Patients were enrolled at six high TAVI volume centers. The endpoints were procedural device success and early safety, according to the VARC-3 criteria.

Results: A total of 47 patients were included in this registry. The mean age was 83.7 ± 7.9, and 66% of the patients were women. Bicuspid type 1 L-R fusion (72.3%) was the dominant anatomical subtype. A high device success rate was achieved: 91.5% in-hospital and 91.1% at 30-day follow-up, while early safety was 70.2% in-hospital and 66.7% at 30 days. No 30-day prosthesis-patient mismatch (PPM) and no ≥moderate paravalvular regurgitation (PVR) were observed at 30 days; meanwhile, rates of permanent pacemaker implantation (PPI) were not negligible (23.4% in-hospital and 26.7% at 30-day follow-up).

Conclusions: The Navitor THV appears to be a safe and effective treatment option for patients with severe bicuspid aortic stenosis. Larger registries and comparison with different platforms are required to validate these outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信