检测迫在眉睫的吸烟失效风险:前瞻性失效风险算法与参与者回顾性自我报告。

IF 3.6 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Jeremy S. Langford , Emily T. Hébert , Darla E. Kendzor , Meng Chen , Damon J. Vidrine , Michael Businelle
{"title":"检测迫在眉睫的吸烟失效风险:前瞻性失效风险算法与参与者回顾性自我报告。","authors":"Jeremy S. Langford ,&nbsp;Emily T. Hébert ,&nbsp;Darla E. Kendzor ,&nbsp;Meng Chen ,&nbsp;Damon J. Vidrine ,&nbsp;Michael Businelle","doi":"10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2025.112873","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Improving detection of smoking lapse risk factors could increase smoking cessation rates among socioeconomically disadvantaged adults, who are less likely to quit than the general population. This study used data from a randomized controlled trial that compared the efficacy of two smartphone-based smoking cessation interventions for socioeconomically disadvantaged adults. Daily ecological momentary assessments (EMAs) assessed current smoking lapse risk based on a previously developed algorithm. Participants were instructed to self-initiate EMAs when they were about to lapse and after a lapse. After self-reported lapses, participants were asked questions about the number of hours of awareness of heightened lapse risk prior to the lapse and coping skills that could have prevented the lapse. Overall, 157 participants self-initiated an EMA to report a smoking lapse during the 13-week post-quit study period. Participants reported detecting warning signs prior to 70.06 % of lapses; however, only 30 % of lapses were anticipated more than two hours in advance. The lapse risk algorithm detected elevated risk in 68.93 % of lapses that were preceded by an EMA within 24<!--> <!-->h. A logistic mixed-effects model indicated that on average the algorithm detected heightened lapse risk earlier than participants reported they were aware of heightened lapse risk, AOR= 3.34, 95 % CI [1.50–7.42]. Participants most frequently endorsed coping with the urge to smoke and stress as skills that would have helped them prevent lapses. EMA-informed algorithms show promise for detecting heightened risk for smoking lapse before participant recognition, an important step for developing effective real-time smoking cessation interventions for socioeconomically disadvantaged adults.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11322,"journal":{"name":"Drug and alcohol dependence","volume":"276 ","pages":"Article 112873"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Detecting imminent smoking lapse risk: Prospective lapse risk algorithm versus participant retrospective self-report\",\"authors\":\"Jeremy S. Langford ,&nbsp;Emily T. Hébert ,&nbsp;Darla E. Kendzor ,&nbsp;Meng Chen ,&nbsp;Damon J. Vidrine ,&nbsp;Michael Businelle\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2025.112873\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Improving detection of smoking lapse risk factors could increase smoking cessation rates among socioeconomically disadvantaged adults, who are less likely to quit than the general population. This study used data from a randomized controlled trial that compared the efficacy of two smartphone-based smoking cessation interventions for socioeconomically disadvantaged adults. Daily ecological momentary assessments (EMAs) assessed current smoking lapse risk based on a previously developed algorithm. Participants were instructed to self-initiate EMAs when they were about to lapse and after a lapse. After self-reported lapses, participants were asked questions about the number of hours of awareness of heightened lapse risk prior to the lapse and coping skills that could have prevented the lapse. Overall, 157 participants self-initiated an EMA to report a smoking lapse during the 13-week post-quit study period. Participants reported detecting warning signs prior to 70.06 % of lapses; however, only 30 % of lapses were anticipated more than two hours in advance. The lapse risk algorithm detected elevated risk in 68.93 % of lapses that were preceded by an EMA within 24<!--> <!-->h. A logistic mixed-effects model indicated that on average the algorithm detected heightened lapse risk earlier than participants reported they were aware of heightened lapse risk, AOR= 3.34, 95 % CI [1.50–7.42]. Participants most frequently endorsed coping with the urge to smoke and stress as skills that would have helped them prevent lapses. EMA-informed algorithms show promise for detecting heightened risk for smoking lapse before participant recognition, an important step for developing effective real-time smoking cessation interventions for socioeconomically disadvantaged adults.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11322,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Drug and alcohol dependence\",\"volume\":\"276 \",\"pages\":\"Article 112873\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Drug and alcohol dependence\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0376871625003266\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Drug and alcohol dependence","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0376871625003266","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

改善对吸烟失效风险因素的检测可以提高社会经济上处于不利地位的成年人的戒烟率,他们比一般人群更不可能戒烟。这项研究使用了一项随机对照试验的数据,该试验比较了两种基于智能手机的戒烟干预措施对社会经济弱势成年人的效果。每日生态瞬间评估(ema)基于先前开发的算法评估当前吸烟失效风险。参与者被要求在他们即将发作时和发作后进行自我激活。在自我报告失误之后,参与者被问及在失误之前意识到失误风险增加的小时数以及可以防止失误的应对技巧。总体而言,157名参与者在戒烟后13周的研究期间自行发起了EMA报告吸烟失效。参与者报告在70.06%的失误之前发现警告信号;然而,只有30%的失误是提前两个多小时预测到的。失误风险算法检测到68.93%的失误在24小时内出现EMA。logistic混合效应模型显示,平均而言,算法在参与者报告其意识到高度失误风险之前检测到高度失误风险,AOR= 3.34, 95% CI[1.50-7.42]。大多数参与者都认为应对吸烟的冲动和压力是帮助他们预防失误的技能。基于ema的算法有望在参与者识别之前检测到戒烟的高风险,这是为社会经济弱势成年人制定有效的实时戒烟干预措施的重要一步。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Detecting imminent smoking lapse risk: Prospective lapse risk algorithm versus participant retrospective self-report
Improving detection of smoking lapse risk factors could increase smoking cessation rates among socioeconomically disadvantaged adults, who are less likely to quit than the general population. This study used data from a randomized controlled trial that compared the efficacy of two smartphone-based smoking cessation interventions for socioeconomically disadvantaged adults. Daily ecological momentary assessments (EMAs) assessed current smoking lapse risk based on a previously developed algorithm. Participants were instructed to self-initiate EMAs when they were about to lapse and after a lapse. After self-reported lapses, participants were asked questions about the number of hours of awareness of heightened lapse risk prior to the lapse and coping skills that could have prevented the lapse. Overall, 157 participants self-initiated an EMA to report a smoking lapse during the 13-week post-quit study period. Participants reported detecting warning signs prior to 70.06 % of lapses; however, only 30 % of lapses were anticipated more than two hours in advance. The lapse risk algorithm detected elevated risk in 68.93 % of lapses that were preceded by an EMA within 24 h. A logistic mixed-effects model indicated that on average the algorithm detected heightened lapse risk earlier than participants reported they were aware of heightened lapse risk, AOR= 3.34, 95 % CI [1.50–7.42]. Participants most frequently endorsed coping with the urge to smoke and stress as skills that would have helped them prevent lapses. EMA-informed algorithms show promise for detecting heightened risk for smoking lapse before participant recognition, an important step for developing effective real-time smoking cessation interventions for socioeconomically disadvantaged adults.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Drug and alcohol dependence
Drug and alcohol dependence 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
7.10%
发文量
409
审稿时长
41 days
期刊介绍: Drug and Alcohol Dependence is an international journal devoted to publishing original research, scholarly reviews, commentaries, and policy analyses in the area of drug, alcohol and tobacco use and dependence. Articles range from studies of the chemistry of substances of abuse, their actions at molecular and cellular sites, in vitro and in vivo investigations of their biochemical, pharmacological and behavioural actions, laboratory-based and clinical research in humans, substance abuse treatment and prevention research, and studies employing methods from epidemiology, sociology, and economics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信