利用照片测量腹部皮肤表面距离用于穿孔器测绘分析——3d打印diep -皮瓣模型的验证研究。

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Fabian N. Necker, David J. Cholok, Marc J. Fischer, Kyle Gifford, Chris Le Castillo, Michael Scholz, Michael Januszyk, Christoph W. Leuze, Bruce L. Daniel, Arash Momeni
{"title":"利用照片测量腹部皮肤表面距离用于穿孔器测绘分析——3d打印diep -皮瓣模型的验证研究。","authors":"Fabian N. Necker,&nbsp;David J. Cholok,&nbsp;Marc J. Fischer,&nbsp;Kyle Gifford,&nbsp;Chris Le Castillo,&nbsp;Michael Scholz,&nbsp;Michael Januszyk,&nbsp;Christoph W. Leuze,&nbsp;Bruce L. Daniel,&nbsp;Arash Momeni","doi":"10.1002/rcs.70108","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>We present a novel method for accurately measuring skin-surface distances using standard smartphone photos and Photoshop, validated on 3D-printed DIEP-flap models and on calibration grid-patterns.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Materials and Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Distance measurements are acquired in Photoshop in a calibration plane between dots on a grid-pattern as well as between perforators on photos of 3D-printed models and compared against ground-truth. Margins of errors are calculated from fitted linear models.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Submillimeter accuracy can be achieved within errors of ±0.45 mm (80% probability) and ±0.8 mm (95% probability) for measuring distances on the dot-grid. On the 3D-printed DIEP-models, distance measurements are accurate within ±1.75 mm (80% probability) and ±3.1 mm (95% probability).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>We introduce a simple yet highly accurate technique to measure skin-surface distances using normal photos. Depending on the scenario, submillimeter or conservatively very low millimetre errors can be achieved, sufficiently accurate for clinical use, whilst maintaining topographic relationships of the measurements.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":50311,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery","volume":"21 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12444031/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Measuring Abdominal Skin-Surface Distances Using Photos for Perforator Mapping Analysis—A Validation Study on 3D-Printed DIEP-Flap Models\",\"authors\":\"Fabian N. Necker,&nbsp;David J. Cholok,&nbsp;Marc J. Fischer,&nbsp;Kyle Gifford,&nbsp;Chris Le Castillo,&nbsp;Michael Scholz,&nbsp;Michael Januszyk,&nbsp;Christoph W. Leuze,&nbsp;Bruce L. Daniel,&nbsp;Arash Momeni\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/rcs.70108\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>We present a novel method for accurately measuring skin-surface distances using standard smartphone photos and Photoshop, validated on 3D-printed DIEP-flap models and on calibration grid-patterns.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Materials and Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Distance measurements are acquired in Photoshop in a calibration plane between dots on a grid-pattern as well as between perforators on photos of 3D-printed models and compared against ground-truth. Margins of errors are calculated from fitted linear models.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Submillimeter accuracy can be achieved within errors of ±0.45 mm (80% probability) and ±0.8 mm (95% probability) for measuring distances on the dot-grid. On the 3D-printed DIEP-models, distance measurements are accurate within ±1.75 mm (80% probability) and ±3.1 mm (95% probability).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>We introduce a simple yet highly accurate technique to measure skin-surface distances using normal photos. Depending on the scenario, submillimeter or conservatively very low millimetre errors can be achieved, sufficiently accurate for clinical use, whilst maintaining topographic relationships of the measurements.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50311,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery\",\"volume\":\"21 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12444031/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/rcs.70108\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/rcs.70108","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:我们提出了一种使用标准智能手机照片和Photoshop精确测量皮肤表面距离的新方法,并在3d打印的DIEP-flap模型和校准网格模式上进行了验证。材料和方法:在Photoshop中在一个校准平面上获取网格图案上点之间的距离测量值,以及3d打印模型照片上穿孔点之间的距离测量值,并与地面真实值进行比较。误差范围由拟合的线性模型计算。结果:在点网格上测量距离,精度可达亚毫米,误差范围分别为±0.45 mm(80%概率)和±0.8 mm(95%概率)。在3d打印的diep模型上,距离测量精度在±1.75 mm(80%概率)和±3.1 mm(95%概率)之间。结论:我们介绍了一种使用正常照片测量皮肤表面距离的简单而高精度的技术。根据不同的情况,可以实现亚毫米或保守的非常低的毫米误差,足够准确地用于临床使用,同时保持测量的地形关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Measuring Abdominal Skin-Surface Distances Using Photos for Perforator Mapping Analysis—A Validation Study on 3D-Printed DIEP-Flap Models

Measuring Abdominal Skin-Surface Distances Using Photos for Perforator Mapping Analysis—A Validation Study on 3D-Printed DIEP-Flap Models

Background

We present a novel method for accurately measuring skin-surface distances using standard smartphone photos and Photoshop, validated on 3D-printed DIEP-flap models and on calibration grid-patterns.

Materials and Methods

Distance measurements are acquired in Photoshop in a calibration plane between dots on a grid-pattern as well as between perforators on photos of 3D-printed models and compared against ground-truth. Margins of errors are calculated from fitted linear models.

Results

Submillimeter accuracy can be achieved within errors of ±0.45 mm (80% probability) and ±0.8 mm (95% probability) for measuring distances on the dot-grid. On the 3D-printed DIEP-models, distance measurements are accurate within ±1.75 mm (80% probability) and ±3.1 mm (95% probability).

Conclusions

We introduce a simple yet highly accurate technique to measure skin-surface distances using normal photos. Depending on the scenario, submillimeter or conservatively very low millimetre errors can be achieved, sufficiently accurate for clinical use, whilst maintaining topographic relationships of the measurements.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
12.00%
发文量
131
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery provides a cross-disciplinary platform for presenting the latest developments in robotics and computer assisted technologies for medical applications. The journal publishes cutting-edge papers and expert reviews, complemented by commentaries, correspondence and conference highlights that stimulate discussion and exchange of ideas. Areas of interest include robotic surgery aids and systems, operative planning tools, medical imaging and visualisation, simulation and navigation, virtual reality, intuitive command and control systems, haptics and sensor technologies. In addition to research and surgical planning studies, the journal welcomes papers detailing clinical trials and applications of computer-assisted workflows and robotic systems in neurosurgery, urology, paediatric, orthopaedic, craniofacial, cardiovascular, thoraco-abdominal, musculoskeletal and visceral surgery. Articles providing critical analysis of clinical trials, assessment of the benefits and risks of the application of these technologies, commenting on ease of use, or addressing surgical education and training issues are also encouraged. The journal aims to foster a community that encompasses medical practitioners, researchers, and engineers and computer scientists developing robotic systems and computational tools in academic and commercial environments, with the intention of promoting and developing these exciting areas of medical technology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信