基于1000种化学品现有毒理学数据的人类健康评估的数据库校准毒性值。

IF 8.1 2区 医学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Alison H Harrill, Shintaro Hagiwara, Chelsea A Weitekamp, Paul C Stanish, Jonathan T Wall, Risa R Sayre, Sarah E Davidson-Fritz, Kelsey Vitense, Daniel T Chang, Michael J Devito, Chris J Gonzales, Maxwell Groover, Michael F Hughes, Richard S Judson, Jason C Lambert, Charles N Lowe, Esra Mutlu, Katie Paul Friedman, Andrew M Watkins, Antony J Williams, Daniel Krewski, Greg M Paoli, Russell S Thomas
{"title":"基于1000种化学品现有毒理学数据的人类健康评估的数据库校准毒性值。","authors":"Alison H Harrill, Shintaro Hagiwara, Chelsea A Weitekamp, Paul C Stanish, Jonathan T Wall, Risa R Sayre, Sarah E Davidson-Fritz, Kelsey Vitense, Daniel T Chang, Michael J Devito, Chris J Gonzales, Maxwell Groover, Michael F Hughes, Richard S Judson, Jason C Lambert, Charles N Lowe, Esra Mutlu, Katie Paul Friedman, Andrew M Watkins, Antony J Williams, Daniel Krewski, Greg M Paoli, Russell S Thomas","doi":"10.1080/10937404.2025.2552108","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The US Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA) and other regulatory agencies routinely assess whether certain chemical exposures might result in harmful health effects. Traditional human health assessments rely upon expert judgment of dose-effect linkages observed in animal toxicology or human studies. Because both collection of toxicology data and synthesis of information might take multiple years to complete, there are relatively few available assessments for decision-making. Identifying methods that yield significant time and resource efficiencies to the process will have scalable public health benefits. To address the need, US EPA developed the database-calibrated assessment process (DCAP) to generate oral, non-cancer human health toxicity values that builds on previously published approaches and guidance. The approach uses the US EPA Toxicity Values Database (ToxValDB) that contains dose-response summary values (DRSVs) from <i>in vivo</i> toxicity studies. The DRSVs are converted to an oral, chronic, human equivalent dose using a series of standard conversion factors. A point-of-departure (POD) is then calculated across a distribution of studies for a given chemical using a calibration percentile that is benchmarked to critical effect PODs from published human health assessments. Traditional and process-specific uncertainties are incorporated to derive a calibrated toxicity value (CTV), defined as an estimate of a daily oral dose to the human population that is likely to be without appreciable risk of adverse non-cancer health effects over a lifetime. This review presents the rationale and methods for the approach, resulting in reporting of 1001 CTVs for chemicals that currently lack a human health assessment.</p>","PeriodicalId":49971,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health-Part B-Critical Reviews","volume":" ","pages":"1-40"},"PeriodicalIF":8.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Database-calibrated toxicity values for human health assessment based on existing toxicology data for one thousand chemicals.\",\"authors\":\"Alison H Harrill, Shintaro Hagiwara, Chelsea A Weitekamp, Paul C Stanish, Jonathan T Wall, Risa R Sayre, Sarah E Davidson-Fritz, Kelsey Vitense, Daniel T Chang, Michael J Devito, Chris J Gonzales, Maxwell Groover, Michael F Hughes, Richard S Judson, Jason C Lambert, Charles N Lowe, Esra Mutlu, Katie Paul Friedman, Andrew M Watkins, Antony J Williams, Daniel Krewski, Greg M Paoli, Russell S Thomas\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10937404.2025.2552108\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The US Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA) and other regulatory agencies routinely assess whether certain chemical exposures might result in harmful health effects. Traditional human health assessments rely upon expert judgment of dose-effect linkages observed in animal toxicology or human studies. Because both collection of toxicology data and synthesis of information might take multiple years to complete, there are relatively few available assessments for decision-making. Identifying methods that yield significant time and resource efficiencies to the process will have scalable public health benefits. To address the need, US EPA developed the database-calibrated assessment process (DCAP) to generate oral, non-cancer human health toxicity values that builds on previously published approaches and guidance. The approach uses the US EPA Toxicity Values Database (ToxValDB) that contains dose-response summary values (DRSVs) from <i>in vivo</i> toxicity studies. The DRSVs are converted to an oral, chronic, human equivalent dose using a series of standard conversion factors. A point-of-departure (POD) is then calculated across a distribution of studies for a given chemical using a calibration percentile that is benchmarked to critical effect PODs from published human health assessments. Traditional and process-specific uncertainties are incorporated to derive a calibrated toxicity value (CTV), defined as an estimate of a daily oral dose to the human population that is likely to be without appreciable risk of adverse non-cancer health effects over a lifetime. This review presents the rationale and methods for the approach, resulting in reporting of 1001 CTVs for chemicals that currently lack a human health assessment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49971,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health-Part B-Critical Reviews\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-40\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health-Part B-Critical Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10937404.2025.2552108\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health-Part B-Critical Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10937404.2025.2552108","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

美国环境保护署(EPA)和其他监管机构定期评估某些化学品接触是否会对健康造成有害影响。传统的人类健康评估依赖于专家对动物毒理学或人体研究中观察到的剂量效应联系的判断。由于毒理学数据的收集和信息的综合可能需要数年才能完成,因此可供决策的评估相对较少。确定能够显著提高时间和资源效率的方法,将对公共卫生产生可扩展的效益。为了满足这一需求,美国环保署开发了数据库校准评估过程(DCAP),以先前发表的方法和指南为基础,生成口服、非癌症人类健康毒性值。该方法使用美国环保局毒性值数据库(ToxValDB),该数据库包含来自体内毒性研究的剂量-反应汇总值(DRSVs)。使用一系列标准转换因子将DRSVs转换为口服、慢性、人体等效剂量。然后,使用校准百分位数计算给定化学品的研究分布的出发点(POD),该百分位数以已发表的人类健康评估中的关键影响POD为基准。将传统的和特定工艺的不确定性结合起来,得出校准毒性值(CTV),定义为对人类每日口服剂量的估计,该剂量在一生中可能没有明显的不利的非癌症健康影响风险。本综述介绍了该方法的基本原理和方法,结果报告了1001个目前缺乏人类健康评估的化学品的ctv。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Database-calibrated toxicity values for human health assessment based on existing toxicology data for one thousand chemicals.

The US Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA) and other regulatory agencies routinely assess whether certain chemical exposures might result in harmful health effects. Traditional human health assessments rely upon expert judgment of dose-effect linkages observed in animal toxicology or human studies. Because both collection of toxicology data and synthesis of information might take multiple years to complete, there are relatively few available assessments for decision-making. Identifying methods that yield significant time and resource efficiencies to the process will have scalable public health benefits. To address the need, US EPA developed the database-calibrated assessment process (DCAP) to generate oral, non-cancer human health toxicity values that builds on previously published approaches and guidance. The approach uses the US EPA Toxicity Values Database (ToxValDB) that contains dose-response summary values (DRSVs) from in vivo toxicity studies. The DRSVs are converted to an oral, chronic, human equivalent dose using a series of standard conversion factors. A point-of-departure (POD) is then calculated across a distribution of studies for a given chemical using a calibration percentile that is benchmarked to critical effect PODs from published human health assessments. Traditional and process-specific uncertainties are incorporated to derive a calibrated toxicity value (CTV), defined as an estimate of a daily oral dose to the human population that is likely to be without appreciable risk of adverse non-cancer health effects over a lifetime. This review presents the rationale and methods for the approach, resulting in reporting of 1001 CTVs for chemicals that currently lack a human health assessment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
13.80
自引率
6.90%
发文量
13
审稿时长
>24 weeks
期刊介绍: "Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health: Part B - Critical Reviews" is an academic journal published by Taylor & Francis, focusing on the critical examination of research in the areas of environmental exposure and population health. With an ISSN identifier of 1093-7404, this journal has established itself as a significant source of scholarly content in the field of toxicology and environmental health. Since its inception, the journal has published over 424 articles that have garnered 35,097 citations, reflecting its impact and relevance in the scientific community. Known for its comprehensive reviews, the journal also goes by the names "Critical Reviews" and "Journal of Toxicology & Environmental Health, Part B, Critical Reviews." The journal's mission is to provide a platform for in-depth analysis and critical discussion of the latest findings in toxicology, environmental health, and related disciplines. By doing so, it contributes to the advancement of knowledge and understanding of the complex interactions between environmental factors and human health, aiding in the development of strategies to protect and improve public health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信