Alison H Harrill, Shintaro Hagiwara, Chelsea A Weitekamp, Paul C Stanish, Jonathan T Wall, Risa R Sayre, Sarah E Davidson-Fritz, Kelsey Vitense, Daniel T Chang, Michael J Devito, Chris J Gonzales, Maxwell Groover, Michael F Hughes, Richard S Judson, Jason C Lambert, Charles N Lowe, Esra Mutlu, Katie Paul Friedman, Andrew M Watkins, Antony J Williams, Daniel Krewski, Greg M Paoli, Russell S Thomas
{"title":"基于1000种化学品现有毒理学数据的人类健康评估的数据库校准毒性值。","authors":"Alison H Harrill, Shintaro Hagiwara, Chelsea A Weitekamp, Paul C Stanish, Jonathan T Wall, Risa R Sayre, Sarah E Davidson-Fritz, Kelsey Vitense, Daniel T Chang, Michael J Devito, Chris J Gonzales, Maxwell Groover, Michael F Hughes, Richard S Judson, Jason C Lambert, Charles N Lowe, Esra Mutlu, Katie Paul Friedman, Andrew M Watkins, Antony J Williams, Daniel Krewski, Greg M Paoli, Russell S Thomas","doi":"10.1080/10937404.2025.2552108","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The US Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA) and other regulatory agencies routinely assess whether certain chemical exposures might result in harmful health effects. Traditional human health assessments rely upon expert judgment of dose-effect linkages observed in animal toxicology or human studies. Because both collection of toxicology data and synthesis of information might take multiple years to complete, there are relatively few available assessments for decision-making. Identifying methods that yield significant time and resource efficiencies to the process will have scalable public health benefits. To address the need, US EPA developed the database-calibrated assessment process (DCAP) to generate oral, non-cancer human health toxicity values that builds on previously published approaches and guidance. The approach uses the US EPA Toxicity Values Database (ToxValDB) that contains dose-response summary values (DRSVs) from <i>in vivo</i> toxicity studies. The DRSVs are converted to an oral, chronic, human equivalent dose using a series of standard conversion factors. A point-of-departure (POD) is then calculated across a distribution of studies for a given chemical using a calibration percentile that is benchmarked to critical effect PODs from published human health assessments. Traditional and process-specific uncertainties are incorporated to derive a calibrated toxicity value (CTV), defined as an estimate of a daily oral dose to the human population that is likely to be without appreciable risk of adverse non-cancer health effects over a lifetime. This review presents the rationale and methods for the approach, resulting in reporting of 1001 CTVs for chemicals that currently lack a human health assessment.</p>","PeriodicalId":49971,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health-Part B-Critical Reviews","volume":" ","pages":"1-40"},"PeriodicalIF":8.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Database-calibrated toxicity values for human health assessment based on existing toxicology data for one thousand chemicals.\",\"authors\":\"Alison H Harrill, Shintaro Hagiwara, Chelsea A Weitekamp, Paul C Stanish, Jonathan T Wall, Risa R Sayre, Sarah E Davidson-Fritz, Kelsey Vitense, Daniel T Chang, Michael J Devito, Chris J Gonzales, Maxwell Groover, Michael F Hughes, Richard S Judson, Jason C Lambert, Charles N Lowe, Esra Mutlu, Katie Paul Friedman, Andrew M Watkins, Antony J Williams, Daniel Krewski, Greg M Paoli, Russell S Thomas\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10937404.2025.2552108\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The US Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA) and other regulatory agencies routinely assess whether certain chemical exposures might result in harmful health effects. Traditional human health assessments rely upon expert judgment of dose-effect linkages observed in animal toxicology or human studies. Because both collection of toxicology data and synthesis of information might take multiple years to complete, there are relatively few available assessments for decision-making. Identifying methods that yield significant time and resource efficiencies to the process will have scalable public health benefits. To address the need, US EPA developed the database-calibrated assessment process (DCAP) to generate oral, non-cancer human health toxicity values that builds on previously published approaches and guidance. The approach uses the US EPA Toxicity Values Database (ToxValDB) that contains dose-response summary values (DRSVs) from <i>in vivo</i> toxicity studies. The DRSVs are converted to an oral, chronic, human equivalent dose using a series of standard conversion factors. A point-of-departure (POD) is then calculated across a distribution of studies for a given chemical using a calibration percentile that is benchmarked to critical effect PODs from published human health assessments. Traditional and process-specific uncertainties are incorporated to derive a calibrated toxicity value (CTV), defined as an estimate of a daily oral dose to the human population that is likely to be without appreciable risk of adverse non-cancer health effects over a lifetime. This review presents the rationale and methods for the approach, resulting in reporting of 1001 CTVs for chemicals that currently lack a human health assessment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49971,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health-Part B-Critical Reviews\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-40\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health-Part B-Critical Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10937404.2025.2552108\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health-Part B-Critical Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10937404.2025.2552108","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Database-calibrated toxicity values for human health assessment based on existing toxicology data for one thousand chemicals.
The US Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA) and other regulatory agencies routinely assess whether certain chemical exposures might result in harmful health effects. Traditional human health assessments rely upon expert judgment of dose-effect linkages observed in animal toxicology or human studies. Because both collection of toxicology data and synthesis of information might take multiple years to complete, there are relatively few available assessments for decision-making. Identifying methods that yield significant time and resource efficiencies to the process will have scalable public health benefits. To address the need, US EPA developed the database-calibrated assessment process (DCAP) to generate oral, non-cancer human health toxicity values that builds on previously published approaches and guidance. The approach uses the US EPA Toxicity Values Database (ToxValDB) that contains dose-response summary values (DRSVs) from in vivo toxicity studies. The DRSVs are converted to an oral, chronic, human equivalent dose using a series of standard conversion factors. A point-of-departure (POD) is then calculated across a distribution of studies for a given chemical using a calibration percentile that is benchmarked to critical effect PODs from published human health assessments. Traditional and process-specific uncertainties are incorporated to derive a calibrated toxicity value (CTV), defined as an estimate of a daily oral dose to the human population that is likely to be without appreciable risk of adverse non-cancer health effects over a lifetime. This review presents the rationale and methods for the approach, resulting in reporting of 1001 CTVs for chemicals that currently lack a human health assessment.
期刊介绍:
"Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health: Part B - Critical Reviews" is an academic journal published by Taylor & Francis, focusing on the critical examination of research in the areas of environmental exposure and population health. With an ISSN identifier of 1093-7404, this journal has established itself as a significant source of scholarly content in the field of toxicology and environmental health.
Since its inception, the journal has published over 424 articles that have garnered 35,097 citations, reflecting its impact and relevance in the scientific community. Known for its comprehensive reviews, the journal also goes by the names "Critical Reviews" and "Journal of Toxicology & Environmental Health, Part B, Critical Reviews."
The journal's mission is to provide a platform for in-depth analysis and critical discussion of the latest findings in toxicology, environmental health, and related disciplines. By doing so, it contributes to the advancement of knowledge and understanding of the complex interactions between environmental factors and human health, aiding in the development of strategies to protect and improve public health.