患者和家属咨询委员会招募和参与不同人群的障碍和促进因素:范围审查。

IF 1.8 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Journal of Patient Experience Pub Date : 2025-09-15 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1177/23743735251376068
Madison P Leia, Kaitlin See, Colleen Cuthbert
{"title":"患者和家属咨询委员会招募和参与不同人群的障碍和促进因素:范围审查。","authors":"Madison P Leia, Kaitlin See, Colleen Cuthbert","doi":"10.1177/23743735251376068","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Patient and family advisory councils (PFACs) serve as structured collaborative groups where patients and caregivers partner with healthcare professionals to shape policies, service delivery, and research. Despite guidelines emphasizing the need for diverse representation, PFACs often remain socio-demographically homogenous, excluding vulnerable populations from critical discussions that shape healthcare outcomes. This scoping review examines barriers and facilitators influencing the recruitment and engagement of diverse populations in PFACs. A systematic search identified studies focusing on recruitment and engagement barriers and facilitators targeting under-represented groups. Forty-three studies that met the inclusion criteria were included in the review. Findings reveal that while race/ethnicity, socioeconomic status, and age are commonly considered diversity factors, other key populations such as individuals with disabilities, migrants, and those with lived experiences of homelessness, are often overlooked. Facilitators that can improve reach to these vulnerable populations include culturally tailored outreach, relationship-building with community leaders, and reducing logistical barriers. This review provides actionable recommendations for improving diversity in PFACs, ensuring equitable patient engagement that reflects the full spectrum of healthcare experiences.</p>","PeriodicalId":45073,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Patient Experience","volume":"12 ","pages":"23743735251376068"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12437180/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Barriers and Facilitators to the Recruitment and Engagement of Diverse Populations Into Patient and Family Advisory Councils: A Scoping Review.\",\"authors\":\"Madison P Leia, Kaitlin See, Colleen Cuthbert\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/23743735251376068\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Patient and family advisory councils (PFACs) serve as structured collaborative groups where patients and caregivers partner with healthcare professionals to shape policies, service delivery, and research. Despite guidelines emphasizing the need for diverse representation, PFACs often remain socio-demographically homogenous, excluding vulnerable populations from critical discussions that shape healthcare outcomes. This scoping review examines barriers and facilitators influencing the recruitment and engagement of diverse populations in PFACs. A systematic search identified studies focusing on recruitment and engagement barriers and facilitators targeting under-represented groups. Forty-three studies that met the inclusion criteria were included in the review. Findings reveal that while race/ethnicity, socioeconomic status, and age are commonly considered diversity factors, other key populations such as individuals with disabilities, migrants, and those with lived experiences of homelessness, are often overlooked. Facilitators that can improve reach to these vulnerable populations include culturally tailored outreach, relationship-building with community leaders, and reducing logistical barriers. This review provides actionable recommendations for improving diversity in PFACs, ensuring equitable patient engagement that reflects the full spectrum of healthcare experiences.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":45073,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Patient Experience\",\"volume\":\"12 \",\"pages\":\"23743735251376068\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12437180/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Patient Experience\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/23743735251376068\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Patient Experience","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23743735251376068","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

患者和家属咨询委员会(PFACs)是结构化的协作小组,患者和护理人员与医疗保健专业人员合作制定政策、提供服务和研究。尽管指导方针强调需要多样化的代表,但pfac往往在社会人口统计学上仍然是同质的,将弱势群体排除在影响医疗保健结果的关键讨论之外。本范围审查审查了影响pfac中不同人群的招募和参与的障碍和促进因素。系统搜索确定了专注于招聘和参与障碍以及针对代表性不足群体的促进者的研究。43项符合纳入标准的研究被纳入本综述。调查结果显示,虽然种族/民族、社会经济地位和年龄通常被认为是多样性因素,但其他关键人群,如残疾人、移民和有无家可归经历的人,往往被忽视。能够扩大对这些弱势群体的覆盖范围的促进因素包括:根据不同文化量身定制的外联服务、与社区领袖建立关系以及减少后勤障碍。本综述为改善PFACs的多样性提供了可行的建议,确保公平的患者参与,反映了全面的医疗保健体验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Barriers and Facilitators to the Recruitment and Engagement of Diverse Populations Into Patient and Family Advisory Councils: A Scoping Review.

Barriers and Facilitators to the Recruitment and Engagement of Diverse Populations Into Patient and Family Advisory Councils: A Scoping Review.

Barriers and Facilitators to the Recruitment and Engagement of Diverse Populations Into Patient and Family Advisory Councils: A Scoping Review.

Barriers and Facilitators to the Recruitment and Engagement of Diverse Populations Into Patient and Family Advisory Councils: A Scoping Review.

Patient and family advisory councils (PFACs) serve as structured collaborative groups where patients and caregivers partner with healthcare professionals to shape policies, service delivery, and research. Despite guidelines emphasizing the need for diverse representation, PFACs often remain socio-demographically homogenous, excluding vulnerable populations from critical discussions that shape healthcare outcomes. This scoping review examines barriers and facilitators influencing the recruitment and engagement of diverse populations in PFACs. A systematic search identified studies focusing on recruitment and engagement barriers and facilitators targeting under-represented groups. Forty-three studies that met the inclusion criteria were included in the review. Findings reveal that while race/ethnicity, socioeconomic status, and age are commonly considered diversity factors, other key populations such as individuals with disabilities, migrants, and those with lived experiences of homelessness, are often overlooked. Facilitators that can improve reach to these vulnerable populations include culturally tailored outreach, relationship-building with community leaders, and reducing logistical barriers. This review provides actionable recommendations for improving diversity in PFACs, ensuring equitable patient engagement that reflects the full spectrum of healthcare experiences.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Patient Experience
Journal of Patient Experience HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
6.70%
发文量
178
审稿时长
15 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信