论自我整合有机体的死亡:对“确定脑死亡的生物哲学方法”的答复。

IF 0.5 Q4 MEDICAL ETHICS
Nicanor Pier Giorgio Austriaco
{"title":"论自我整合有机体的死亡:对“确定脑死亡的生物哲学方法”的答复。","authors":"Nicanor Pier Giorgio Austriaco","doi":"10.1177/00243639251375335","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To advance the debate over the brain death (BD) criteria, Sulmasy and colleagues have recently proposed that the BD criteria can be saved if three things are done. First, they suggest that the philosophical rationale used to justify the BD criteria should be changed to acknowledge that the human body is self-integrated and not integrated by the brain. They then propose that this self-integration is lost when the total functioning of the brain, especially the functioning of the hypothalamus, is lost. Finally, they affirm that medical criteria for BD should be expanded to include a diagnosis of diabetes insipidus to ensure that there has been a total loss of brain function. In response, I agree with Sulmasy and his colleagues that the human organism is a self-integrating system. However, I will also affirm that it is self-integrating because it is self-organized. Next, I will interrogate the claim that loss of total brain function, including loss of all hypothalamic function, can trigger the death of a self-integrating organism. In principle, I agree, but I also think that there are other organs that are also vital for the self--integration of the body. Thus, I affirm that we cannot justify and defend the total BD criteria for death as Sulmasy and his colleagues have attempted to do so without opening ourselves up to other combinations of systemic organ failures that would trigger loss of the inherent capacity to self-integrate: Death by neurological criteria has evolved to death by integrative criteria. Finally, we close with a brief discussion of the impact of Sulmasy and colleagues' proposal on the contemporary BD debate: I believe that it still cannot give us the moral certainty that we are looking for to justify the organ transplantation of vital organs from BD patients because there is already clinical evidence that suggests that some BD patients were able to survive for a long period of time even without hypothalamic function.</p>","PeriodicalId":44238,"journal":{"name":"Linacre Quarterly","volume":" ","pages":"00243639251375335"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12436322/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"On the Death of a Self-Integrating Organism: A Reply to \\\"A Biophilosophical Approach to the Determination of Brain Death\\\".\",\"authors\":\"Nicanor Pier Giorgio Austriaco\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/00243639251375335\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>To advance the debate over the brain death (BD) criteria, Sulmasy and colleagues have recently proposed that the BD criteria can be saved if three things are done. First, they suggest that the philosophical rationale used to justify the BD criteria should be changed to acknowledge that the human body is self-integrated and not integrated by the brain. They then propose that this self-integration is lost when the total functioning of the brain, especially the functioning of the hypothalamus, is lost. Finally, they affirm that medical criteria for BD should be expanded to include a diagnosis of diabetes insipidus to ensure that there has been a total loss of brain function. In response, I agree with Sulmasy and his colleagues that the human organism is a self-integrating system. However, I will also affirm that it is self-integrating because it is self-organized. Next, I will interrogate the claim that loss of total brain function, including loss of all hypothalamic function, can trigger the death of a self-integrating organism. In principle, I agree, but I also think that there are other organs that are also vital for the self--integration of the body. Thus, I affirm that we cannot justify and defend the total BD criteria for death as Sulmasy and his colleagues have attempted to do so without opening ourselves up to other combinations of systemic organ failures that would trigger loss of the inherent capacity to self-integrate: Death by neurological criteria has evolved to death by integrative criteria. Finally, we close with a brief discussion of the impact of Sulmasy and colleagues' proposal on the contemporary BD debate: I believe that it still cannot give us the moral certainty that we are looking for to justify the organ transplantation of vital organs from BD patients because there is already clinical evidence that suggests that some BD patients were able to survive for a long period of time even without hypothalamic function.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":44238,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Linacre Quarterly\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"00243639251375335\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12436322/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Linacre Quarterly\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/00243639251375335\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICAL ETHICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Linacre Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00243639251375335","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICAL ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

为了推进关于脑死亡(BD)标准的争论,Sulmasy和他的同事最近提出,如果做了三件事,就可以挽救BD标准。首先,他们建议,用来证明双相障碍标准的哲学原理应该改变,承认人体是自我整合的,而不是由大脑整合的。然后,他们提出,当大脑的全部功能,尤其是下丘脑的功能丧失时,这种自我整合就会丧失。最后,他们确认双相障碍的医学标准应该扩大到包括尿崩症的诊断,以确保脑功能完全丧失。作为回应,我同意Sulmasy和他的同事的观点,即人体是一个自我整合的系统。然而,我也肯定它是自整合的,因为它是自组织的。接下来,我将质疑这样一种说法,即大脑全部功能的丧失,包括所有下丘脑功能的丧失,会引发一个自我整合的有机体的死亡。原则上,我同意,但我也认为还有其他器官对身体的自我整合也很重要。因此,我肯定,我们不能像Sulmasy和他的同事们那样,在不考虑其他可能导致丧失内在自我整合能力的系统性器官衰竭的组合的情况下,为总的双相障碍死亡标准辩护和辩护:神经学标准的死亡已经演变为综合标准的死亡。最后,我们简要讨论一下Sulmasy及其同事的建议对当代双相障碍争论的影响:我认为,它仍然不能给我们道德上的确定性,我们正在寻找从双相障碍患者身上移植重要器官的理由,因为已经有临床证据表明,一些双相障碍患者即使没有下丘脑功能也能存活很长一段时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
On the Death of a Self-Integrating Organism: A Reply to "A Biophilosophical Approach to the Determination of Brain Death".

To advance the debate over the brain death (BD) criteria, Sulmasy and colleagues have recently proposed that the BD criteria can be saved if three things are done. First, they suggest that the philosophical rationale used to justify the BD criteria should be changed to acknowledge that the human body is self-integrated and not integrated by the brain. They then propose that this self-integration is lost when the total functioning of the brain, especially the functioning of the hypothalamus, is lost. Finally, they affirm that medical criteria for BD should be expanded to include a diagnosis of diabetes insipidus to ensure that there has been a total loss of brain function. In response, I agree with Sulmasy and his colleagues that the human organism is a self-integrating system. However, I will also affirm that it is self-integrating because it is self-organized. Next, I will interrogate the claim that loss of total brain function, including loss of all hypothalamic function, can trigger the death of a self-integrating organism. In principle, I agree, but I also think that there are other organs that are also vital for the self--integration of the body. Thus, I affirm that we cannot justify and defend the total BD criteria for death as Sulmasy and his colleagues have attempted to do so without opening ourselves up to other combinations of systemic organ failures that would trigger loss of the inherent capacity to self-integrate: Death by neurological criteria has evolved to death by integrative criteria. Finally, we close with a brief discussion of the impact of Sulmasy and colleagues' proposal on the contemporary BD debate: I believe that it still cannot give us the moral certainty that we are looking for to justify the organ transplantation of vital organs from BD patients because there is already clinical evidence that suggests that some BD patients were able to survive for a long period of time even without hypothalamic function.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Linacre Quarterly
Linacre Quarterly MEDICAL ETHICS-
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
40.00%
发文量
57
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信