[西维拉默与醋酸钙治疗维持性血液透析患者高磷血症]。

Q3 Medicine
Kang Liu, Jin Zhao, Fan Wang, Xiaodong Liu, Jing Gao
{"title":"[西维拉默与醋酸钙治疗维持性血液透析患者高磷血症]。","authors":"Kang Liu, Jin Zhao, Fan Wang, Xiaodong Liu, Jing Gao","doi":"10.12182/20250560605","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the efficacy of sevelamer (SL) and calcium acetate (CA) in treating hyperphosphatemia in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) undergoing maintenance hemodialysis (MHD) and their effects on calcium-phosphorus metabolism and levels of peripheral blood fetuin-A and fibroblast growth factor-23 (FGF-23).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 92 ESRD patients attending the First Hospital of Zibo between January 2022 and December 2023 were enrolled. They were randomly assigned to either the CA group (46 cases) or the SL group (46 cases) using a random number table method. Patients in both groups received MHD and conventional treatment. Additionally, patients in the CA group were given CA, while those in the SL group were given SL, with the treatment continuing for 3 months. The outcome indicators were assessed and compared between the two groups. The primary outcome indicator was clinical efficacy. The secondary outcome indicators included calcium-phosphorus metabolism indicators (blood calcium, blood phosphorus, calcium-phosphorus product, and intact parathyroid hormone [iPTH]), coronary artery calcification score (CACs), serum biochemical indicators (including fetuin-A, FGF-23, and C-reactive protein [CRP]), and adverse reactions and cardiovascular events during the course of treatment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were no statistically significant differences in baseline data between the two groups (<i>P</i> > 0.05). There was a significant difference in clinical efficacy between the SL group and the CA group (<i>P</i> < 0.05). The differences in blood calcium, blood phosphorus, calcium-phosphorus product, iPTH, and CACs before and after treatment were statistically significant between the two groups (<i>P</i> < 0.05). The differences in fetuin-A, FGF-23, and CRP before and after treatment were also statistically significant between the two groups (<i>P</i> < 0.05). During treatment, there was no significant difference in the incidences of adverse reactions and cardiovascular events between the two groups (<i>P</i> > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>SL demonstrates superior efficacy compared to CA in treating hyperphosphatemia in MHD patients. SL effectively regulates calcium-phosphorus metabolism, reduces CACs, regulates peripheral blood fetuin-A and FGF-23 levels, and leads to fewer adverse reactions. SL may be a preferred option for clinical management.</p>","PeriodicalId":39321,"journal":{"name":"四川大学学报(医学版)","volume":"56 3","pages":"798-803"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12439654/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Sevelamer vs. Calcium Acetate for Treating Hyperphosphatemia in Maintenance Hemodialysis Patients].\",\"authors\":\"Kang Liu, Jin Zhao, Fan Wang, Xiaodong Liu, Jing Gao\",\"doi\":\"10.12182/20250560605\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the efficacy of sevelamer (SL) and calcium acetate (CA) in treating hyperphosphatemia in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) undergoing maintenance hemodialysis (MHD) and their effects on calcium-phosphorus metabolism and levels of peripheral blood fetuin-A and fibroblast growth factor-23 (FGF-23).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 92 ESRD patients attending the First Hospital of Zibo between January 2022 and December 2023 were enrolled. They were randomly assigned to either the CA group (46 cases) or the SL group (46 cases) using a random number table method. Patients in both groups received MHD and conventional treatment. Additionally, patients in the CA group were given CA, while those in the SL group were given SL, with the treatment continuing for 3 months. The outcome indicators were assessed and compared between the two groups. The primary outcome indicator was clinical efficacy. The secondary outcome indicators included calcium-phosphorus metabolism indicators (blood calcium, blood phosphorus, calcium-phosphorus product, and intact parathyroid hormone [iPTH]), coronary artery calcification score (CACs), serum biochemical indicators (including fetuin-A, FGF-23, and C-reactive protein [CRP]), and adverse reactions and cardiovascular events during the course of treatment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were no statistically significant differences in baseline data between the two groups (<i>P</i> > 0.05). There was a significant difference in clinical efficacy between the SL group and the CA group (<i>P</i> < 0.05). The differences in blood calcium, blood phosphorus, calcium-phosphorus product, iPTH, and CACs before and after treatment were statistically significant between the two groups (<i>P</i> < 0.05). The differences in fetuin-A, FGF-23, and CRP before and after treatment were also statistically significant between the two groups (<i>P</i> < 0.05). During treatment, there was no significant difference in the incidences of adverse reactions and cardiovascular events between the two groups (<i>P</i> > 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>SL demonstrates superior efficacy compared to CA in treating hyperphosphatemia in MHD patients. SL effectively regulates calcium-phosphorus metabolism, reduces CACs, regulates peripheral blood fetuin-A and FGF-23 levels, and leads to fewer adverse reactions. SL may be a preferred option for clinical management.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":39321,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"四川大学学报(医学版)\",\"volume\":\"56 3\",\"pages\":\"798-803\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12439654/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"四川大学学报(医学版)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12182/20250560605\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"四川大学学报(医学版)","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12182/20250560605","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:探讨西维拉默(SL)和醋酸钙(CA)治疗终末期肾病(ESRD)维护性血液透析(MHD)患者高磷血症的疗效及对外周血胎蛋白a和成纤维细胞生长因子-23 (FGF-23)水平的影响。方法:选取2022年1月至2023年12月在淄博市第一医院就诊的ESRD患者92例。采用随机数字表法将患者随机分为CA组(46例)和SL组(46例)。两组患者均接受MHD和常规治疗。CA组给予CA治疗,SL组给予SL治疗,疗程为3个月。对两组的结局指标进行评估和比较。主要结局指标为临床疗效。次要结局指标包括钙磷代谢指标(血钙、血磷、钙磷产物、完整甲状旁腺激素[iPTH])、冠状动脉钙化评分(CACs)、血清生化指标(胎蛋白a、FGF-23、c反应蛋白[CRP])、治疗过程中不良反应及心血管事件。结果:两组患者基线资料比较,差异无统计学意义(P < 0.05)。SL组与CA组临床疗效比较差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。两组患者治疗前后血钙、血磷、钙磷产物、iPTH、CACs比较,差异均有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。两组患者治疗前后胎激素a、FGF-23、CRP水平比较,差异均有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。治疗期间,两组患者不良反应及心血管事件发生率比较,差异无统计学意义(P < 0.05)。结论:SL治疗MHD患者高磷血症的疗效优于CA。SL有效调节钙磷代谢,降低CACs,调节外周血fetuin-A和FGF-23水平,不良反应少。SL可能是临床治疗的首选方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[Sevelamer vs. Calcium Acetate for Treating Hyperphosphatemia in Maintenance Hemodialysis Patients].

Objective: To investigate the efficacy of sevelamer (SL) and calcium acetate (CA) in treating hyperphosphatemia in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) undergoing maintenance hemodialysis (MHD) and their effects on calcium-phosphorus metabolism and levels of peripheral blood fetuin-A and fibroblast growth factor-23 (FGF-23).

Methods: A total of 92 ESRD patients attending the First Hospital of Zibo between January 2022 and December 2023 were enrolled. They were randomly assigned to either the CA group (46 cases) or the SL group (46 cases) using a random number table method. Patients in both groups received MHD and conventional treatment. Additionally, patients in the CA group were given CA, while those in the SL group were given SL, with the treatment continuing for 3 months. The outcome indicators were assessed and compared between the two groups. The primary outcome indicator was clinical efficacy. The secondary outcome indicators included calcium-phosphorus metabolism indicators (blood calcium, blood phosphorus, calcium-phosphorus product, and intact parathyroid hormone [iPTH]), coronary artery calcification score (CACs), serum biochemical indicators (including fetuin-A, FGF-23, and C-reactive protein [CRP]), and adverse reactions and cardiovascular events during the course of treatment.

Results: There were no statistically significant differences in baseline data between the two groups (P > 0.05). There was a significant difference in clinical efficacy between the SL group and the CA group (P < 0.05). The differences in blood calcium, blood phosphorus, calcium-phosphorus product, iPTH, and CACs before and after treatment were statistically significant between the two groups (P < 0.05). The differences in fetuin-A, FGF-23, and CRP before and after treatment were also statistically significant between the two groups (P < 0.05). During treatment, there was no significant difference in the incidences of adverse reactions and cardiovascular events between the two groups (P > 0.05).

Conclusion: SL demonstrates superior efficacy compared to CA in treating hyperphosphatemia in MHD patients. SL effectively regulates calcium-phosphorus metabolism, reduces CACs, regulates peripheral blood fetuin-A and FGF-23 levels, and leads to fewer adverse reactions. SL may be a preferred option for clinical management.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
四川大学学报(医学版)
四川大学学报(医学版) Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Molecular Biology
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8695
期刊介绍: "Journal of Sichuan University (Medical Edition)" is a comprehensive medical academic journal sponsored by Sichuan University, a higher education institution directly under the Ministry of Education of the People's Republic of China. It was founded in 1959 and was originally named "Journal of Sichuan Medical College". In 1986, it was renamed "Journal of West China University of Medical Sciences". In 2003, it was renamed "Journal of Sichuan University (Medical Edition)" (bimonthly). "Journal of Sichuan University (Medical Edition)" is a Chinese core journal and a Chinese authoritative academic journal (RCCSE). It is included in the retrieval systems such as China Science and Technology Papers and Citation Database (CSTPCD), China Science Citation Database (CSCD) (core version), Peking University Library's "Overview of Chinese Core Journals", the U.S. "Index Medica" (IM/Medline), the U.S. "PubMed Central" (PMC), the U.S. "Biological Abstracts" (BA), the U.S. "Chemical Abstracts" (CA), the U.S. EBSCO, the Netherlands "Abstracts and Citation Database" (Scopus), the Japan Science and Technology Agency Database (JST), the Russian "Abstract Magazine", the Chinese Biomedical Literature CD-ROM Database (CBMdisc), the Chinese Biomedical Periodical Literature Database (CMCC), the China Academic Journal Network Full-text Database (CNKI), the Chinese Academic Journal (CD-ROM Edition), and the Wanfang Data-Digital Journal Group.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信