大学中性卫生间:从学生的角度探讨利弊。

IF 2 4区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Fau Rosati, Eleonora Innocenzi, Roberto Baiocco, Andrea Micoli, Salvatore Ioverno, Jessica Pistella
{"title":"大学中性卫生间:从学生的角度探讨利弊。","authors":"Fau Rosati, Eleonora Innocenzi, Roberto Baiocco, Andrea Micoli, Salvatore Ioverno, Jessica Pistella","doi":"10.1080/00918369.2025.2556862","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Gender-neutral bathrooms improve the quality of life for transgender and nonbinary (TNB) individuals, particularly in daily contexts such as universities. However, their introduction remains debated, with resistance often rooted in binary gender norms and perceived risks. This study uses semi-structured interviews to explore university students' perspectives (<i>n</i> = 65; 66% identified as LGBTQIA+) on implementing gender-neutral restrooms. Results from reflexive thematic analysis reveal strong support for gender-neutral restrooms across gender identities, with two main thematic areas: <i>benefits</i> and <i>risks</i>. According to participants, the benefits include less minority stress, improved academic well-being for TNB students, a safer space, an affirmative environment, and benefits for everyone. Risks include gender harassment and discomfort, forced outings, and cisgender complaints. Notably, students preferred a fully affirmative model over a separate gender-neutral restroom, as the latter could increase exposure and stigmatization for TNB students. These findings emphasize the need for universities to align with broader societal shifts toward affirmative policy and equity. Most participants advocate gender-neutral restrooms as policies promoting safety, accessibility, and fairness. Universities should actively involve students in policy development to ensure that restroom facilities reflect their needs and experiences.</p>","PeriodicalId":48221,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Homosexuality","volume":" ","pages":"1-25"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Gender-Neutral Bathrooms in Universities: Exploring Benefits and Risks from Student Perspectives.\",\"authors\":\"Fau Rosati, Eleonora Innocenzi, Roberto Baiocco, Andrea Micoli, Salvatore Ioverno, Jessica Pistella\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00918369.2025.2556862\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Gender-neutral bathrooms improve the quality of life for transgender and nonbinary (TNB) individuals, particularly in daily contexts such as universities. However, their introduction remains debated, with resistance often rooted in binary gender norms and perceived risks. This study uses semi-structured interviews to explore university students' perspectives (<i>n</i> = 65; 66% identified as LGBTQIA+) on implementing gender-neutral restrooms. Results from reflexive thematic analysis reveal strong support for gender-neutral restrooms across gender identities, with two main thematic areas: <i>benefits</i> and <i>risks</i>. According to participants, the benefits include less minority stress, improved academic well-being for TNB students, a safer space, an affirmative environment, and benefits for everyone. Risks include gender harassment and discomfort, forced outings, and cisgender complaints. Notably, students preferred a fully affirmative model over a separate gender-neutral restroom, as the latter could increase exposure and stigmatization for TNB students. These findings emphasize the need for universities to align with broader societal shifts toward affirmative policy and equity. Most participants advocate gender-neutral restrooms as policies promoting safety, accessibility, and fairness. Universities should actively involve students in policy development to ensure that restroom facilities reflect their needs and experiences.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48221,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Homosexuality\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-25\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Homosexuality\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00918369.2025.2556862\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Homosexuality","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00918369.2025.2556862","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

中性浴室提高了跨性别和非二元性别(TNB)个体的生活质量,特别是在大学等日常环境中。然而,它们的引入仍然存在争议,阻力往往源于二元性别规范和感知风险。本研究采用半结构化访谈法,探讨大学生(n = 65; 66%为LGBTQIA+)对实施性别中立厕所的看法。反身性专题分析的结果显示,性别认同者对中性厕所的强烈支持,主要有两个主题领域:利益和风险。根据参与者的说法,这些好处包括减少少数民族的压力,提高TNB学生的学业幸福感,一个更安全的空间,一个积极的环境,以及每个人的利益。风险包括性别骚扰和不适,被迫外出,以及顺性别投诉。值得注意的是,学生们更喜欢一个完全平权的模式,而不是一个独立的性别中立的厕所,因为后者可能会增加TNB学生的曝光率和污名化。这些研究结果强调,大学需要与更广泛的社会转变保持一致,朝着平权政策和公平的方向发展。大多数参与者都主张不分性别的厕所,因为这是一项促进安全、无障碍和公平的政策。大学应积极让学生参与政策制定,以确保厕所设施反映学生的需求和经验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Gender-Neutral Bathrooms in Universities: Exploring Benefits and Risks from Student Perspectives.

Gender-neutral bathrooms improve the quality of life for transgender and nonbinary (TNB) individuals, particularly in daily contexts such as universities. However, their introduction remains debated, with resistance often rooted in binary gender norms and perceived risks. This study uses semi-structured interviews to explore university students' perspectives (n = 65; 66% identified as LGBTQIA+) on implementing gender-neutral restrooms. Results from reflexive thematic analysis reveal strong support for gender-neutral restrooms across gender identities, with two main thematic areas: benefits and risks. According to participants, the benefits include less minority stress, improved academic well-being for TNB students, a safer space, an affirmative environment, and benefits for everyone. Risks include gender harassment and discomfort, forced outings, and cisgender complaints. Notably, students preferred a fully affirmative model over a separate gender-neutral restroom, as the latter could increase exposure and stigmatization for TNB students. These findings emphasize the need for universities to align with broader societal shifts toward affirmative policy and equity. Most participants advocate gender-neutral restrooms as policies promoting safety, accessibility, and fairness. Universities should actively involve students in policy development to ensure that restroom facilities reflect their needs and experiences.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
7.70%
发文量
164
期刊介绍: The Journal of Homosexuality is an internationally acclaimed, peer-reviewed publication devoted to publishing a wide variety of disciplinary and interdisciplinary scholarship to foster a thorough understanding of the complexities, nuances, and the multifaceted aspects of sexuality and gender. The chief aim of the journal is to publish thought-provoking scholarship by researchers, community activists, and scholars who employ a range of research methodologies and who offer a variety of perspectives to continue shaping knowledge production in the arenas of lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender (LGBT) studies and queer studies. The Journal of Homosexuality is committed to offering substantive, accessible reading to researchers and general readers alike in the hope of: spurring additional research, offering ideas to integrate into educational programs at schools, colleges & universities, or community-based organizations, and manifesting activism against sexual and gender prejudice (e.g., homophobia, biphobia and transphobia), including the promotion of sexual and gender justice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信