一年级医学生肩部解剖和临床检查技能的综合电子学习:随机对照试验。

IF 3.2 Q1 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES
Roland Koch, Lena Gassner, Navina Gerlach, Teresa Festl-Wietek, Bernhard Hirt, Stefanie Joos, Thomas Shiozawa
{"title":"一年级医学生肩部解剖和临床检查技能的综合电子学习:随机对照试验。","authors":"Roland Koch, Lena Gassner, Navina Gerlach, Teresa Festl-Wietek, Bernhard Hirt, Stefanie Joos, Thomas Shiozawa","doi":"10.2196/62666","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Applying functional anatomy to clinical examination techniques in shoulder examination is challenging for physicians at all learning stages. Anatomy teaching has shifted toward a more function-oriented approach and has increasingly incorporated e-learning. There is limited evidence on whether the integrated teaching of professionalism, clinical examination technique, and functional anatomy via e-learning is effective.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to investigate the impact of an integrated blended learning course on the ability of first-year medical students to perform a shoulder examination on healthy volunteers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Based on Kolb's experiential learning theory, we designed a course on shoulder anatomy and clinical examination techniques that integrates preclinical and clinical content across all 4 stages of Kolb's learning cycle. The study is a randomized, observer-blinded controlled trial involving first-year medical students who are assigned to one of two groups. Both groups participated in blended learning courses; however, the intervention group's course combined clinical examination, anatomy, and professional behavior and included a peer-assisted practice session as well as a flipped classroom seminar. The control group's course combined an online lecture with self-study and self-examination. After completing the course, participants uploaded a video of their shoulder examination. The videos were scored by 2 blinded raters using a standardized examination checklist with a total score of 40.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-eight medical students were included from the 80 participants needed based on the power calculation. Seventeen intervention and 14 control students completed the 3-week study. The intervention group students scored a mean of 34.71 (SD 1.99). The control students scored a mean of 29.43 (SD 5.13). The difference of means was 5.3 points and proved to be statistically significant (P<.001; 2-sided Mann-Whitney U test).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The study shows that anatomy, professional behavior, and clinical examination skills can also be taught in an integrated blended learning approach. For first-year medical students, this approach proved more effective than online lectures and self-study.</p>","PeriodicalId":36236,"journal":{"name":"JMIR Medical Education","volume":"11 ","pages":"e62666"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12443353/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Integrated e-Learning for Shoulder Anatomy and Clinical Examination Skills in First-Year Medical Students: Randomized Controlled Trial.\",\"authors\":\"Roland Koch, Lena Gassner, Navina Gerlach, Teresa Festl-Wietek, Bernhard Hirt, Stefanie Joos, Thomas Shiozawa\",\"doi\":\"10.2196/62666\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Applying functional anatomy to clinical examination techniques in shoulder examination is challenging for physicians at all learning stages. Anatomy teaching has shifted toward a more function-oriented approach and has increasingly incorporated e-learning. There is limited evidence on whether the integrated teaching of professionalism, clinical examination technique, and functional anatomy via e-learning is effective.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to investigate the impact of an integrated blended learning course on the ability of first-year medical students to perform a shoulder examination on healthy volunteers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Based on Kolb's experiential learning theory, we designed a course on shoulder anatomy and clinical examination techniques that integrates preclinical and clinical content across all 4 stages of Kolb's learning cycle. The study is a randomized, observer-blinded controlled trial involving first-year medical students who are assigned to one of two groups. Both groups participated in blended learning courses; however, the intervention group's course combined clinical examination, anatomy, and professional behavior and included a peer-assisted practice session as well as a flipped classroom seminar. The control group's course combined an online lecture with self-study and self-examination. After completing the course, participants uploaded a video of their shoulder examination. The videos were scored by 2 blinded raters using a standardized examination checklist with a total score of 40.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-eight medical students were included from the 80 participants needed based on the power calculation. Seventeen intervention and 14 control students completed the 3-week study. The intervention group students scored a mean of 34.71 (SD 1.99). The control students scored a mean of 29.43 (SD 5.13). The difference of means was 5.3 points and proved to be statistically significant (P<.001; 2-sided Mann-Whitney U test).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The study shows that anatomy, professional behavior, and clinical examination skills can also be taught in an integrated blended learning approach. For first-year medical students, this approach proved more effective than online lectures and self-study.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36236,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JMIR Medical Education\",\"volume\":\"11 \",\"pages\":\"e62666\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12443353/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JMIR Medical Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2196/62666\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMIR Medical Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/62666","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:将功能解剖学应用于肩部检查的临床检查技术对所有学习阶段的医生来说都是一个挑战。解剖学教学已经转向更以功能为导向的方法,并越来越多地结合电子学习。关于通过电子学习整合专业、临床检查技术和功能解剖学的教学是否有效的证据有限。目的:本研究旨在探讨综合混合学习课程对医学生对健康志愿者进行肩部检查能力的影响。方法:基于Kolb的体验式学习理论,我们设计了一门肩部解剖和临床检查技术课程,将临床前和临床内容整合到Kolb学习周期的所有4个阶段。该研究是一项随机、观察盲法对照试验,涉及一年级医学生,他们被分为两组。两组都参加了混合式学习课程;然而,干预组的课程结合了临床检查、解剖学和专业行为,并包括一个同伴辅助练习课程和一个翻转课堂研讨会。对照组的课程将在线授课与自学和自考相结合。完成课程后,参与者上传了他们肩部检查的视频。视频由2名盲法评分者使用标准化检查清单评分,总分为40分。结果:根据幂次计算,80名被试中有38名医学生入选。17名干预学生和14名对照学生完成了为期3周的研究。干预组学生平均得分为34.71分(SD 1.99)。对照组学生的平均得分为29.43 (SD 5.13)。平均值的差异为5.3分,具有统计学意义(p)结论:本研究表明,解剖学、职业行为、临床检查技能也可以采用综合混合学习的方式进行教学。对于一年级医学生来说,这种方法被证明比在线授课和自学更有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Integrated e-Learning for Shoulder Anatomy and Clinical Examination Skills in First-Year Medical Students: Randomized Controlled Trial.

Background: Applying functional anatomy to clinical examination techniques in shoulder examination is challenging for physicians at all learning stages. Anatomy teaching has shifted toward a more function-oriented approach and has increasingly incorporated e-learning. There is limited evidence on whether the integrated teaching of professionalism, clinical examination technique, and functional anatomy via e-learning is effective.

Objective: This study aimed to investigate the impact of an integrated blended learning course on the ability of first-year medical students to perform a shoulder examination on healthy volunteers.

Methods: Based on Kolb's experiential learning theory, we designed a course on shoulder anatomy and clinical examination techniques that integrates preclinical and clinical content across all 4 stages of Kolb's learning cycle. The study is a randomized, observer-blinded controlled trial involving first-year medical students who are assigned to one of two groups. Both groups participated in blended learning courses; however, the intervention group's course combined clinical examination, anatomy, and professional behavior and included a peer-assisted practice session as well as a flipped classroom seminar. The control group's course combined an online lecture with self-study and self-examination. After completing the course, participants uploaded a video of their shoulder examination. The videos were scored by 2 blinded raters using a standardized examination checklist with a total score of 40.

Results: Thirty-eight medical students were included from the 80 participants needed based on the power calculation. Seventeen intervention and 14 control students completed the 3-week study. The intervention group students scored a mean of 34.71 (SD 1.99). The control students scored a mean of 29.43 (SD 5.13). The difference of means was 5.3 points and proved to be statistically significant (P<.001; 2-sided Mann-Whitney U test).

Conclusions: The study shows that anatomy, professional behavior, and clinical examination skills can also be taught in an integrated blended learning approach. For first-year medical students, this approach proved more effective than online lectures and self-study.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
JMIR Medical Education
JMIR Medical Education Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
6.90
自引率
5.60%
发文量
54
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信