[长江上游流域生态风险评价与生态区划建设]。

Q2 Environmental Science
Bin-Sen Chen, Dan-Jing Yuan, Yi-Ran Mao, Wen-Yu Li, Chuan-Hao Wen
{"title":"[长江上游流域生态风险评价与生态区划建设]。","authors":"Bin-Sen Chen, Dan-Jing Yuan, Yi-Ran Mao, Wen-Yu Li, Chuan-Hao Wen","doi":"10.13227/j.hjkx.202407276","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The upper reaches of the Yangtze River is an important ecological barrier for the entire Yangtze River Basin and a key national water source and conservation area, and its ecological risk problem constrains the sustainable development of the whole Yangtze River Basin. To evaluate the ecological environment security status of the upper Yangtze River, based on land use data from 1980 to 2020, the land use transfer matrix, ecosystem service value evaluation model, and ecological risk index model were applied to explore the spatial and temporal evolution patterns of ecosystem service provision value and ecological risk index in the upper Yangtze River Basin, and the <i>Z</i>-score standardization method was applied to construct four types of ecological zones. The results of the study follow: ① The changes of each land use type in the upper Yangtze River Basin were significant. However, the areas of unutilized land and arable land decreased more substantially, by 8 222 km<sup>2</sup> and 6 776 km<sup>2</sup>, respectively, accounting for 48.68% and 40.12% of the total decrease. ② Forest land was the most dominant land use type transferring out and transferring in, with areas of 121 125 km<sup>2</sup> and 129 424 km<sup>2</sup>, respectively, accounting for 32.26% and 34.47% of the total area of transfers out and transfers in. ③ The ecosystem service value showed a trend of decreasing and then increasing, with the high supply value area mainly distributed in northern Yunnan Province and southwestern Sichuan Province and the low supply value area mainly distributed in Chengdu Municipality, western Chongqing Municipality, and other areas with high population density. ④ The average ecological risk in the upper Yangtze River Basin showed a trend of fluctuating upward and then downward, gradually shifting to the medium-risk type, with a spatial distribution of \"high in the northwest and east, and low in the middle.\" ⑤ During the study period, the number of the four types of ecological zones changed little, and the ecological zones were in a stable state. Among them, the partition type with the largest proportion was the high supply value-low ecological risk zone, and the distribution area of the high supply value-high ecological risk zone was relatively small. The findings above provide theoretical references for the ecological security of the upper reaches of the Yangtze River as well as the coordinated development of the economy and ecological environment in the Yangtze River Basin.</p>","PeriodicalId":35937,"journal":{"name":"环境科学","volume":"46 9","pages":"5861-5871"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Ecological Risk Evaluation and Ecological Zoning Construction in the Upper Yangtze River Basin].\",\"authors\":\"Bin-Sen Chen, Dan-Jing Yuan, Yi-Ran Mao, Wen-Yu Li, Chuan-Hao Wen\",\"doi\":\"10.13227/j.hjkx.202407276\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The upper reaches of the Yangtze River is an important ecological barrier for the entire Yangtze River Basin and a key national water source and conservation area, and its ecological risk problem constrains the sustainable development of the whole Yangtze River Basin. To evaluate the ecological environment security status of the upper Yangtze River, based on land use data from 1980 to 2020, the land use transfer matrix, ecosystem service value evaluation model, and ecological risk index model were applied to explore the spatial and temporal evolution patterns of ecosystem service provision value and ecological risk index in the upper Yangtze River Basin, and the <i>Z</i>-score standardization method was applied to construct four types of ecological zones. The results of the study follow: ① The changes of each land use type in the upper Yangtze River Basin were significant. However, the areas of unutilized land and arable land decreased more substantially, by 8 222 km<sup>2</sup> and 6 776 km<sup>2</sup>, respectively, accounting for 48.68% and 40.12% of the total decrease. ② Forest land was the most dominant land use type transferring out and transferring in, with areas of 121 125 km<sup>2</sup> and 129 424 km<sup>2</sup>, respectively, accounting for 32.26% and 34.47% of the total area of transfers out and transfers in. ③ The ecosystem service value showed a trend of decreasing and then increasing, with the high supply value area mainly distributed in northern Yunnan Province and southwestern Sichuan Province and the low supply value area mainly distributed in Chengdu Municipality, western Chongqing Municipality, and other areas with high population density. ④ The average ecological risk in the upper Yangtze River Basin showed a trend of fluctuating upward and then downward, gradually shifting to the medium-risk type, with a spatial distribution of \\\"high in the northwest and east, and low in the middle.\\\" ⑤ During the study period, the number of the four types of ecological zones changed little, and the ecological zones were in a stable state. Among them, the partition type with the largest proportion was the high supply value-low ecological risk zone, and the distribution area of the high supply value-high ecological risk zone was relatively small. The findings above provide theoretical references for the ecological security of the upper reaches of the Yangtze River as well as the coordinated development of the economy and ecological environment in the Yangtze River Basin.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":35937,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"环境科学\",\"volume\":\"46 9\",\"pages\":\"5861-5871\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"环境科学\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1087\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.13227/j.hjkx.202407276\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Environmental Science\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"环境科学","FirstCategoryId":"1087","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13227/j.hjkx.202407276","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Environmental Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

长江上游是整个长江流域的重要生态屏障,是国家重点水源地和涵养区,其生态风险问题制约着整个长江流域的可持续发展。为评价长江上游生态环境安全状况,基于1980 - 2020年土地利用数据,应用土地利用转移矩阵、生态系统服务价值评价模型和生态风险指数模型,探讨长江上游生态系统服务提供价值和生态风险指数的时空演变规律,并采用Z-score标准化方法构建4种类型的生态区。研究结果表明:①长江上游流域各土地利用类型变化显著。未利用土地和耕地面积减少幅度较大,分别减少了8 222 km2和6 776 km2,分别占减少面积的48.68%和40.12%。②林地是最主要的土地利用类型,面积分别为121 125 km2和129 424 km2,分别占迁出和迁入总面积的32.26%和34.47%。③生态系统服务价值呈现先降低后增加的趋势,高供给值区主要分布在云南北部和四川西南部,低供给值区主要分布在成都市、重庆市西部等人口密度较大的地区。④长江上游平均生态风险呈现先上升后下降的波动趋势,逐渐向中等风险型转移,空间分布呈现“西北、东部高,中部低”的格局。⑤研究期间,四种类型的生态带数量变化不大,生态带处于稳定状态。其中,占比最大的分区类型为高供给值-低生态风险区,高供给值-高生态风险区分布面积相对较小。以上研究结果为长江上游生态安全以及长江流域经济与生态环境的协调发展提供了理论参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[Ecological Risk Evaluation and Ecological Zoning Construction in the Upper Yangtze River Basin].

The upper reaches of the Yangtze River is an important ecological barrier for the entire Yangtze River Basin and a key national water source and conservation area, and its ecological risk problem constrains the sustainable development of the whole Yangtze River Basin. To evaluate the ecological environment security status of the upper Yangtze River, based on land use data from 1980 to 2020, the land use transfer matrix, ecosystem service value evaluation model, and ecological risk index model were applied to explore the spatial and temporal evolution patterns of ecosystem service provision value and ecological risk index in the upper Yangtze River Basin, and the Z-score standardization method was applied to construct four types of ecological zones. The results of the study follow: ① The changes of each land use type in the upper Yangtze River Basin were significant. However, the areas of unutilized land and arable land decreased more substantially, by 8 222 km2 and 6 776 km2, respectively, accounting for 48.68% and 40.12% of the total decrease. ② Forest land was the most dominant land use type transferring out and transferring in, with areas of 121 125 km2 and 129 424 km2, respectively, accounting for 32.26% and 34.47% of the total area of transfers out and transfers in. ③ The ecosystem service value showed a trend of decreasing and then increasing, with the high supply value area mainly distributed in northern Yunnan Province and southwestern Sichuan Province and the low supply value area mainly distributed in Chengdu Municipality, western Chongqing Municipality, and other areas with high population density. ④ The average ecological risk in the upper Yangtze River Basin showed a trend of fluctuating upward and then downward, gradually shifting to the medium-risk type, with a spatial distribution of "high in the northwest and east, and low in the middle." ⑤ During the study period, the number of the four types of ecological zones changed little, and the ecological zones were in a stable state. Among them, the partition type with the largest proportion was the high supply value-low ecological risk zone, and the distribution area of the high supply value-high ecological risk zone was relatively small. The findings above provide theoretical references for the ecological security of the upper reaches of the Yangtze River as well as the coordinated development of the economy and ecological environment in the Yangtze River Basin.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
环境科学
环境科学 Environmental Science-Environmental Science (all)
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15329
期刊介绍:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信