下一代健康指南的专家观点:如何将RWE融入循证医学。

IF 2.7 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Pragmatic and Observational Research Pub Date : 2025-09-11 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/POR.S487342
Stefano Del Giacco, Giorgio Walter Canonica, Ioana Agache, David Price, Nicolas Roche, Holger Schunemann, Keith Allan, Ignacio Ansotegui, Simona Barbaglia, Jonathan A Bernstein, Matteo Bonini, Sinthia Bosnic-Anticevich, Jean Bousquet, Fulvio Braido, Victoria Carter, Herberto Jose Chong-Neto, Danilo Di Bona, Kirsty Fletton, Sandra Gonzalez Diaz, Vandana Ayyar Gupta, Richard Hubbard, Jonathan Iaccarino, Ibon Eguiluz-Gracia, Cristina Jacomelli, Janwillem Kocks, Jerry Krishnan, Vera Mahler, Mario Morais-Almeida, Daniel Moreles, Paola Muti, Susanna Palkonen, Nikolaos G Papadopoulos, Ruby Pawankar, Christina Reeb, Helen Reddel, Isabel Rojo, Dermot Ryan, Lydia Sodhi, Maria Torres, Tonya Winders, Kevin C Wilson
{"title":"下一代健康指南的专家观点:如何将RWE融入循证医学。","authors":"Stefano Del Giacco, Giorgio Walter Canonica, Ioana Agache, David Price, Nicolas Roche, Holger Schunemann, Keith Allan, Ignacio Ansotegui, Simona Barbaglia, Jonathan A Bernstein, Matteo Bonini, Sinthia Bosnic-Anticevich, Jean Bousquet, Fulvio Braido, Victoria Carter, Herberto Jose Chong-Neto, Danilo Di Bona, Kirsty Fletton, Sandra Gonzalez Diaz, Vandana Ayyar Gupta, Richard Hubbard, Jonathan Iaccarino, Ibon Eguiluz-Gracia, Cristina Jacomelli, Janwillem Kocks, Jerry Krishnan, Vera Mahler, Mario Morais-Almeida, Daniel Moreles, Paola Muti, Susanna Palkonen, Nikolaos G Papadopoulos, Ruby Pawankar, Christina Reeb, Helen Reddel, Isabel Rojo, Dermot Ryan, Lydia Sodhi, Maria Torres, Tonya Winders, Kevin C Wilson","doi":"10.2147/POR.S487342","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Integrating real-world evidence (RWE) into evidence-based medicine (EBM) enhances healthcare decision-making. RWE provides insights into the real-world effectiveness and safety of therapies and health technologies, filling gaps that clinical trials may leave. EBM, which concentrates on therapeutic issues, depends on rigorous evaluation of evidence, including data from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and RWE. Combining evidence from RCTs and RWE when forming recommendations offers a comprehensive understanding of benefits and risks by considering their strengths, limitations, and standardized methods. The 2nd European Academy of Allergy & Clinical Immunology/Respiratory Effectiveness Group (EAACI/REG) Workshop, held in Rome, Italy, on October 4th, 2023, discussed integrating RWE and EBM. The goals were to develop recommendations for high-quality RWE and its inclusion in evidence syntheses, with a particular focus on airway diseases. During the discussion, key topics emerged. An \"action plan\" is needed to share these topics in various formats. RCTs are currently seen as providing the strongest evidence, so how to incorporate Non-Randomized Studies of Interventions (NRSI) requires careful consideration. An educational plan and collaboration with patients' organizations are also very important. A collaborative approach involving patients, clinicians, and regulators is essential for achieving meaningful results and can be adapted as needed for cultural differences. A \"glossary\" of terms used in this context will be created to improve understanding. Setting benchmarks for data quality and reliability, such as quality thresholds, in disease-specific studies requires collaboration with research method experts. Managing and recording registries according to standardized protocols and quality standards from well-designed registries will ensure the data is valid and accurate.</p>","PeriodicalId":20399,"journal":{"name":"Pragmatic and Observational Research","volume":"16 ","pages":"169-177"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12436199/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Expert Perspectives on Next Generation Health Guidelines: How to Integrate RWE in EBM.\",\"authors\":\"Stefano Del Giacco, Giorgio Walter Canonica, Ioana Agache, David Price, Nicolas Roche, Holger Schunemann, Keith Allan, Ignacio Ansotegui, Simona Barbaglia, Jonathan A Bernstein, Matteo Bonini, Sinthia Bosnic-Anticevich, Jean Bousquet, Fulvio Braido, Victoria Carter, Herberto Jose Chong-Neto, Danilo Di Bona, Kirsty Fletton, Sandra Gonzalez Diaz, Vandana Ayyar Gupta, Richard Hubbard, Jonathan Iaccarino, Ibon Eguiluz-Gracia, Cristina Jacomelli, Janwillem Kocks, Jerry Krishnan, Vera Mahler, Mario Morais-Almeida, Daniel Moreles, Paola Muti, Susanna Palkonen, Nikolaos G Papadopoulos, Ruby Pawankar, Christina Reeb, Helen Reddel, Isabel Rojo, Dermot Ryan, Lydia Sodhi, Maria Torres, Tonya Winders, Kevin C Wilson\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/POR.S487342\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Integrating real-world evidence (RWE) into evidence-based medicine (EBM) enhances healthcare decision-making. RWE provides insights into the real-world effectiveness and safety of therapies and health technologies, filling gaps that clinical trials may leave. EBM, which concentrates on therapeutic issues, depends on rigorous evaluation of evidence, including data from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and RWE. Combining evidence from RCTs and RWE when forming recommendations offers a comprehensive understanding of benefits and risks by considering their strengths, limitations, and standardized methods. The 2nd European Academy of Allergy & Clinical Immunology/Respiratory Effectiveness Group (EAACI/REG) Workshop, held in Rome, Italy, on October 4th, 2023, discussed integrating RWE and EBM. The goals were to develop recommendations for high-quality RWE and its inclusion in evidence syntheses, with a particular focus on airway diseases. During the discussion, key topics emerged. An \\\"action plan\\\" is needed to share these topics in various formats. RCTs are currently seen as providing the strongest evidence, so how to incorporate Non-Randomized Studies of Interventions (NRSI) requires careful consideration. An educational plan and collaboration with patients' organizations are also very important. A collaborative approach involving patients, clinicians, and regulators is essential for achieving meaningful results and can be adapted as needed for cultural differences. A \\\"glossary\\\" of terms used in this context will be created to improve understanding. Setting benchmarks for data quality and reliability, such as quality thresholds, in disease-specific studies requires collaboration with research method experts. Managing and recording registries according to standardized protocols and quality standards from well-designed registries will ensure the data is valid and accurate.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20399,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pragmatic and Observational Research\",\"volume\":\"16 \",\"pages\":\"169-177\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12436199/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pragmatic and Observational Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/POR.S487342\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pragmatic and Observational Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/POR.S487342","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

将真实世界证据(RWE)整合到循证医学(EBM)中可以提高医疗保健决策。RWE提供了对现实世界中治疗方法和卫生技术的有效性和安全性的见解,填补了临床试验可能留下的空白。EBM专注于治疗问题,依赖于对证据的严格评估,包括随机对照试验(rct)和RWE的数据。在形成建议时,结合rct和RWE的证据,通过考虑其优势、局限性和标准化方法,可以全面了解益处和风险。2023年10月4日在意大利罗马举行的第二届欧洲科学院过敏与临床免疫学/呼吸有效性小组(EAACI/REG)研讨会讨论了RWE和EBM的整合。目标是制定关于高质量RWE及其纳入证据综合的建议,特别侧重于气道疾病。在讨论过程中,出现了一些关键问题。需要一个“行动计划”,以各种形式分享这些主题。rct目前被认为提供了最有力的证据,因此如何纳入非随机干预研究(NRSI)需要仔细考虑。教育计划和与患者组织的合作也非常重要。涉及患者、临床医生和监管机构的协作方法对于取得有意义的结果至关重要,并且可以根据文化差异的需要进行调整。将创建用于此上下文中的术语“词汇表”,以提高理解。在特定疾病研究中为数据质量和可靠性设定基准,例如质量阈值,需要与研究方法专家合作。根据标准化协议和质量标准管理和记录来自设计良好的注册表将确保数据有效和准确。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Expert Perspectives on Next Generation Health Guidelines: How to Integrate RWE in EBM.

Integrating real-world evidence (RWE) into evidence-based medicine (EBM) enhances healthcare decision-making. RWE provides insights into the real-world effectiveness and safety of therapies and health technologies, filling gaps that clinical trials may leave. EBM, which concentrates on therapeutic issues, depends on rigorous evaluation of evidence, including data from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and RWE. Combining evidence from RCTs and RWE when forming recommendations offers a comprehensive understanding of benefits and risks by considering their strengths, limitations, and standardized methods. The 2nd European Academy of Allergy & Clinical Immunology/Respiratory Effectiveness Group (EAACI/REG) Workshop, held in Rome, Italy, on October 4th, 2023, discussed integrating RWE and EBM. The goals were to develop recommendations for high-quality RWE and its inclusion in evidence syntheses, with a particular focus on airway diseases. During the discussion, key topics emerged. An "action plan" is needed to share these topics in various formats. RCTs are currently seen as providing the strongest evidence, so how to incorporate Non-Randomized Studies of Interventions (NRSI) requires careful consideration. An educational plan and collaboration with patients' organizations are also very important. A collaborative approach involving patients, clinicians, and regulators is essential for achieving meaningful results and can be adapted as needed for cultural differences. A "glossary" of terms used in this context will be created to improve understanding. Setting benchmarks for data quality and reliability, such as quality thresholds, in disease-specific studies requires collaboration with research method experts. Managing and recording registries according to standardized protocols and quality standards from well-designed registries will ensure the data is valid and accurate.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pragmatic and Observational Research
Pragmatic and Observational Research MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
期刊介绍: Pragmatic and Observational Research is an international, peer-reviewed, open-access journal that publishes data from studies designed to closely reflect medical interventions in real-world clinical practice, providing insights beyond classical randomized controlled trials (RCTs). While RCTs maximize internal validity for cause-and-effect relationships, they often represent only specific patient groups. This journal aims to complement such studies by providing data that better mirrors real-world patients and the usage of medicines, thus informing guidelines and enhancing the applicability of research findings across diverse patient populations encountered in everyday clinical practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信