{"title":"缬草对原发性痛经的影响:系统综述和荟萃分析。","authors":"Fatemeh Rabiei, Moloud Aghajani Delavar, Parvaneh Mirabi, Parisa Masoumi, Athar Jahanshahi","doi":"10.2174/0115748871387235250902123910","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Primary dysmenorrhea, defined by painful menstruation in the absence of pelvic disorders, often requires treatment. Traditional options such as NSAIDs and oral contraceptives have limitations. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluate the efficacy of Valeriana officinalis (Valerian) in managing primary dysmenorrhea.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a comprehensive literature search (2000-November 2023) for RCTs comparing valerian to placebo or NSAIDs in primary dysmenorrhea. The primary outcome was a reduction in dysmenorrhea pain. Risk of bias was assessed using Cochrane's tool.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Five controlled trials (201 intervention, 207 control participants) met the inclusion criteria. The random-effects model showed a significant pain reduction with valerian versus control (SMD = -1.03; 95% CI, -1.74 to -0.33; P < 0.004). Heterogeneity was high (Cochrane's Q test: P < 0.001; I² = 90.40%). Valerian was safe and well-tolerated.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Valerian significantly reduced dysmenorrhea pain by 1.03 points on a VAS 0-10 scale, though high heterogeneity and limited studies necessitate cautious interpretation. Potential mechanisms (e.g., GABA modulation) may underlie its effects, but variability in dosing and trial designs complicates comparisons.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>While valerian appears promising for primary dysmenorrhea, further standardized RCTs are needed to confirm efficacy and address heterogeneity.</p>","PeriodicalId":21174,"journal":{"name":"Reviews on recent clinical trials","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of Valeriana officinalis on Primary Dysmenorrhea: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Fatemeh Rabiei, Moloud Aghajani Delavar, Parvaneh Mirabi, Parisa Masoumi, Athar Jahanshahi\",\"doi\":\"10.2174/0115748871387235250902123910\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Primary dysmenorrhea, defined by painful menstruation in the absence of pelvic disorders, often requires treatment. Traditional options such as NSAIDs and oral contraceptives have limitations. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluate the efficacy of Valeriana officinalis (Valerian) in managing primary dysmenorrhea.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a comprehensive literature search (2000-November 2023) for RCTs comparing valerian to placebo or NSAIDs in primary dysmenorrhea. The primary outcome was a reduction in dysmenorrhea pain. Risk of bias was assessed using Cochrane's tool.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Five controlled trials (201 intervention, 207 control participants) met the inclusion criteria. The random-effects model showed a significant pain reduction with valerian versus control (SMD = -1.03; 95% CI, -1.74 to -0.33; P < 0.004). Heterogeneity was high (Cochrane's Q test: P < 0.001; I² = 90.40%). Valerian was safe and well-tolerated.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Valerian significantly reduced dysmenorrhea pain by 1.03 points on a VAS 0-10 scale, though high heterogeneity and limited studies necessitate cautious interpretation. Potential mechanisms (e.g., GABA modulation) may underlie its effects, but variability in dosing and trial designs complicates comparisons.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>While valerian appears promising for primary dysmenorrhea, further standardized RCTs are needed to confirm efficacy and address heterogeneity.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21174,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Reviews on recent clinical trials\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Reviews on recent clinical trials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2174/0115748871387235250902123910\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reviews on recent clinical trials","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/0115748871387235250902123910","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Effect of Valeriana officinalis on Primary Dysmenorrhea: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Introduction: Primary dysmenorrhea, defined by painful menstruation in the absence of pelvic disorders, often requires treatment. Traditional options such as NSAIDs and oral contraceptives have limitations. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluate the efficacy of Valeriana officinalis (Valerian) in managing primary dysmenorrhea.
Methods: We conducted a comprehensive literature search (2000-November 2023) for RCTs comparing valerian to placebo or NSAIDs in primary dysmenorrhea. The primary outcome was a reduction in dysmenorrhea pain. Risk of bias was assessed using Cochrane's tool.
Results: Five controlled trials (201 intervention, 207 control participants) met the inclusion criteria. The random-effects model showed a significant pain reduction with valerian versus control (SMD = -1.03; 95% CI, -1.74 to -0.33; P < 0.004). Heterogeneity was high (Cochrane's Q test: P < 0.001; I² = 90.40%). Valerian was safe and well-tolerated.
Discussion: Valerian significantly reduced dysmenorrhea pain by 1.03 points on a VAS 0-10 scale, though high heterogeneity and limited studies necessitate cautious interpretation. Potential mechanisms (e.g., GABA modulation) may underlie its effects, but variability in dosing and trial designs complicates comparisons.
Conclusion: While valerian appears promising for primary dysmenorrhea, further standardized RCTs are needed to confirm efficacy and address heterogeneity.
期刊介绍:
Reviews on Recent Clinical Trials publishes frontier reviews on recent clinical trials of major importance. The journal"s aim is to publish the highest quality review articles in the field. Topics covered include: important Phase I – IV clinical trial studies, clinical investigations at all stages of development and therapeutics. The journal is essential reading for all researchers and clinicians involved in drug therapy and clinical trials.