缬草对原发性痛经的影响:系统综述和荟萃分析。

IF 1 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Fatemeh Rabiei, Moloud Aghajani Delavar, Parvaneh Mirabi, Parisa Masoumi, Athar Jahanshahi
{"title":"缬草对原发性痛经的影响:系统综述和荟萃分析。","authors":"Fatemeh Rabiei, Moloud Aghajani Delavar, Parvaneh Mirabi, Parisa Masoumi, Athar Jahanshahi","doi":"10.2174/0115748871387235250902123910","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Primary dysmenorrhea, defined by painful menstruation in the absence of pelvic disorders, often requires treatment. Traditional options such as NSAIDs and oral contraceptives have limitations. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluate the efficacy of Valeriana officinalis (Valerian) in managing primary dysmenorrhea.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a comprehensive literature search (2000-November 2023) for RCTs comparing valerian to placebo or NSAIDs in primary dysmenorrhea. The primary outcome was a reduction in dysmenorrhea pain. Risk of bias was assessed using Cochrane's tool.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Five controlled trials (201 intervention, 207 control participants) met the inclusion criteria. The random-effects model showed a significant pain reduction with valerian versus control (SMD = -1.03; 95% CI, -1.74 to -0.33; P < 0.004). Heterogeneity was high (Cochrane's Q test: P < 0.001; I² = 90.40%). Valerian was safe and well-tolerated.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Valerian significantly reduced dysmenorrhea pain by 1.03 points on a VAS 0-10 scale, though high heterogeneity and limited studies necessitate cautious interpretation. Potential mechanisms (e.g., GABA modulation) may underlie its effects, but variability in dosing and trial designs complicates comparisons.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>While valerian appears promising for primary dysmenorrhea, further standardized RCTs are needed to confirm efficacy and address heterogeneity.</p>","PeriodicalId":21174,"journal":{"name":"Reviews on recent clinical trials","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of Valeriana officinalis on Primary Dysmenorrhea: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Fatemeh Rabiei, Moloud Aghajani Delavar, Parvaneh Mirabi, Parisa Masoumi, Athar Jahanshahi\",\"doi\":\"10.2174/0115748871387235250902123910\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Primary dysmenorrhea, defined by painful menstruation in the absence of pelvic disorders, often requires treatment. Traditional options such as NSAIDs and oral contraceptives have limitations. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluate the efficacy of Valeriana officinalis (Valerian) in managing primary dysmenorrhea.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a comprehensive literature search (2000-November 2023) for RCTs comparing valerian to placebo or NSAIDs in primary dysmenorrhea. The primary outcome was a reduction in dysmenorrhea pain. Risk of bias was assessed using Cochrane's tool.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Five controlled trials (201 intervention, 207 control participants) met the inclusion criteria. The random-effects model showed a significant pain reduction with valerian versus control (SMD = -1.03; 95% CI, -1.74 to -0.33; P < 0.004). Heterogeneity was high (Cochrane's Q test: P < 0.001; I² = 90.40%). Valerian was safe and well-tolerated.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Valerian significantly reduced dysmenorrhea pain by 1.03 points on a VAS 0-10 scale, though high heterogeneity and limited studies necessitate cautious interpretation. Potential mechanisms (e.g., GABA modulation) may underlie its effects, but variability in dosing and trial designs complicates comparisons.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>While valerian appears promising for primary dysmenorrhea, further standardized RCTs are needed to confirm efficacy and address heterogeneity.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21174,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Reviews on recent clinical trials\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Reviews on recent clinical trials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2174/0115748871387235250902123910\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reviews on recent clinical trials","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/0115748871387235250902123910","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:原发性痛经,定义为在没有盆腔疾病的情况下月经疼痛,通常需要治疗。传统的选择,如非甾体抗炎药和口服避孕药有局限性。本系统综述和荟萃分析评估缬草(缬草)治疗原发性痛经的疗效。方法:我们进行了全面的文献检索(2000年11月至2023年11月),比较缬草与安慰剂或非甾体抗炎药治疗原发性痛经的随机对照试验。主要结局是痛经疼痛减轻。使用Cochrane工具评估偏倚风险。结果:5项对照试验(201项干预,207名对照受试者)符合纳入标准。随机效应模型显示缬草与对照组相比显著减轻疼痛(SMD = -1.03; 95% CI, -1.74至-0.33;P < 0.004)。异质性高(Cochrane’s Q检验:P < 0.001; I²= 90.40%)。缬草是安全且耐受性良好的。讨论:缬草在VAS 0-10评分中显著减少痛经疼痛1.03分,但异质性高,研究有限,需要谨慎解释。潜在的机制(例如,GABA调制)可能是其作用的基础,但剂量和试验设计的可变性使比较复杂化。结论:虽然缬草治疗原发性痛经似乎很有希望,但需要进一步标准化的随机对照试验来确认疗效并解决异质性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effect of Valeriana officinalis on Primary Dysmenorrhea: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Introduction: Primary dysmenorrhea, defined by painful menstruation in the absence of pelvic disorders, often requires treatment. Traditional options such as NSAIDs and oral contraceptives have limitations. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluate the efficacy of Valeriana officinalis (Valerian) in managing primary dysmenorrhea.

Methods: We conducted a comprehensive literature search (2000-November 2023) for RCTs comparing valerian to placebo or NSAIDs in primary dysmenorrhea. The primary outcome was a reduction in dysmenorrhea pain. Risk of bias was assessed using Cochrane's tool.

Results: Five controlled trials (201 intervention, 207 control participants) met the inclusion criteria. The random-effects model showed a significant pain reduction with valerian versus control (SMD = -1.03; 95% CI, -1.74 to -0.33; P < 0.004). Heterogeneity was high (Cochrane's Q test: P < 0.001; I² = 90.40%). Valerian was safe and well-tolerated.

Discussion: Valerian significantly reduced dysmenorrhea pain by 1.03 points on a VAS 0-10 scale, though high heterogeneity and limited studies necessitate cautious interpretation. Potential mechanisms (e.g., GABA modulation) may underlie its effects, but variability in dosing and trial designs complicates comparisons.

Conclusion: While valerian appears promising for primary dysmenorrhea, further standardized RCTs are needed to confirm efficacy and address heterogeneity.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Reviews on recent clinical trials
Reviews on recent clinical trials PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
5.30%
发文量
44
期刊介绍: Reviews on Recent Clinical Trials publishes frontier reviews on recent clinical trials of major importance. The journal"s aim is to publish the highest quality review articles in the field. Topics covered include: important Phase I – IV clinical trial studies, clinical investigations at all stages of development and therapeutics. The journal is essential reading for all researchers and clinicians involved in drug therapy and clinical trials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信