Xianqing Zeng , Yan Huang , Keyu Wang , Jiujiu Wang , Ming Meng
{"title":"二元听力和双眼竞争知觉中选择性注意的不同神经机制:来自功能性脑网络分析的证据。","authors":"Xianqing Zeng , Yan Huang , Keyu Wang , Jiujiu Wang , Ming Meng","doi":"10.1016/j.neuroimage.2025.121464","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Although selective attention similarly modulates bistable perception in auditory and visual domains, its neural mechanisms remain unclear. Using fMRI within a naturalistic paradigm—dichotic listening (DL) with narrative stimuli and binocular rivalry (BR) with movie clips—we combined multiscale ICA-based brain network analysis (inter-/intra-subject correlation and dynamic FC) to investigate attentional mechanisms in DL and BR. In DL, when participants attended to the same narrative, the inter-SC of both right executive control network (RECN) and sensorimotor network (SMN) increased compared to when they attended to different narratives, indicating that the RECN and SMN were involved in the attentional mechanism of DL. Regardless of attentional content consistency, the auditory network (AudN) showed significant synchrony in both inter-SC and intra-SC analyses, suggesting stimulus-driven processing in DL. For BR, significant inter- and intra-SC were only observed in networks related to stimulus-driven processing, namely the higher visual network (HVN) and language network (LN), while no selective attention-related cognitive networks were identified. Furthermore, no dFC effects in the DL task were found. However, in the BR condition, the FC between the HVN and LN was significantly enhanced when attending to characters versus architecture, and the difference was robustly positively correlated with the difference in perceptual dominance duration of character-related movies between the two conditions. In summary, our results demonstrate that the modulation mechanisms of selective attention differ substantially between DL and BR. The former involves executive control, whereas the latter relies on neural circuits supporting perceptual processing.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":19299,"journal":{"name":"NeuroImage","volume":"320 ","pages":"Article 121464"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Divergent neural mechanisms of selective attention in dichotic listening and binocular rivalry perception: Evidence from functional brain network analysis\",\"authors\":\"Xianqing Zeng , Yan Huang , Keyu Wang , Jiujiu Wang , Ming Meng\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.neuroimage.2025.121464\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Although selective attention similarly modulates bistable perception in auditory and visual domains, its neural mechanisms remain unclear. Using fMRI within a naturalistic paradigm—dichotic listening (DL) with narrative stimuli and binocular rivalry (BR) with movie clips—we combined multiscale ICA-based brain network analysis (inter-/intra-subject correlation and dynamic FC) to investigate attentional mechanisms in DL and BR. In DL, when participants attended to the same narrative, the inter-SC of both right executive control network (RECN) and sensorimotor network (SMN) increased compared to when they attended to different narratives, indicating that the RECN and SMN were involved in the attentional mechanism of DL. Regardless of attentional content consistency, the auditory network (AudN) showed significant synchrony in both inter-SC and intra-SC analyses, suggesting stimulus-driven processing in DL. For BR, significant inter- and intra-SC were only observed in networks related to stimulus-driven processing, namely the higher visual network (HVN) and language network (LN), while no selective attention-related cognitive networks were identified. Furthermore, no dFC effects in the DL task were found. However, in the BR condition, the FC between the HVN and LN was significantly enhanced when attending to characters versus architecture, and the difference was robustly positively correlated with the difference in perceptual dominance duration of character-related movies between the two conditions. In summary, our results demonstrate that the modulation mechanisms of selective attention differ substantially between DL and BR. The former involves executive control, whereas the latter relies on neural circuits supporting perceptual processing.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19299,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"NeuroImage\",\"volume\":\"320 \",\"pages\":\"Article 121464\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"NeuroImage\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1053811925004677\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROIMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NeuroImage","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1053811925004677","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NEUROIMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
Divergent neural mechanisms of selective attention in dichotic listening and binocular rivalry perception: Evidence from functional brain network analysis
Although selective attention similarly modulates bistable perception in auditory and visual domains, its neural mechanisms remain unclear. Using fMRI within a naturalistic paradigm—dichotic listening (DL) with narrative stimuli and binocular rivalry (BR) with movie clips—we combined multiscale ICA-based brain network analysis (inter-/intra-subject correlation and dynamic FC) to investigate attentional mechanisms in DL and BR. In DL, when participants attended to the same narrative, the inter-SC of both right executive control network (RECN) and sensorimotor network (SMN) increased compared to when they attended to different narratives, indicating that the RECN and SMN were involved in the attentional mechanism of DL. Regardless of attentional content consistency, the auditory network (AudN) showed significant synchrony in both inter-SC and intra-SC analyses, suggesting stimulus-driven processing in DL. For BR, significant inter- and intra-SC were only observed in networks related to stimulus-driven processing, namely the higher visual network (HVN) and language network (LN), while no selective attention-related cognitive networks were identified. Furthermore, no dFC effects in the DL task were found. However, in the BR condition, the FC between the HVN and LN was significantly enhanced when attending to characters versus architecture, and the difference was robustly positively correlated with the difference in perceptual dominance duration of character-related movies between the two conditions. In summary, our results demonstrate that the modulation mechanisms of selective attention differ substantially between DL and BR. The former involves executive control, whereas the latter relies on neural circuits supporting perceptual processing.
期刊介绍:
NeuroImage, a Journal of Brain Function provides a vehicle for communicating important advances in acquiring, analyzing, and modelling neuroimaging data and in applying these techniques to the study of structure-function and brain-behavior relationships. Though the emphasis is on the macroscopic level of human brain organization, meso-and microscopic neuroimaging across all species will be considered if informative for understanding the aforementioned relationships.