硬膜外岩前入路相关并发症:系统回顾和荟萃分析。

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Guilherme Gago, Antonio Strangio, Frederico de Lima Gibbon, Marc-Olivier Comeau, Fernando Cotrim Gomes, Pierre-Olivier Champagne
{"title":"硬膜外岩前入路相关并发症:系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Guilherme Gago, Antonio Strangio, Frederico de Lima Gibbon, Marc-Olivier Comeau, Fernando Cotrim Gomes, Pierre-Olivier Champagne","doi":"10.1007/s10143-025-03813-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The extradural anterior petrosal approach (EAPA) is a surgical technique utilized to access pathologies in the petroclival region and the anterolateral aspect of the brainstem, allowing enhanced visualization and maneuverability. Despite its advantages, the EAPA is associated with significant potential complications that remain a topic of debate within the neurosurgical community. This meta-analysis aims to evaluate the incidence of approach-related complications following EAPA. A systematic literature review was conducted across several databases, including PubMed, Scopus, and Embase. The primary outcome was cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak, while secondary outcomes included facial palsy, hearing loss, temporal lobe injury, postoperative seizures, and dry eye. Statistical analysis was performed using RStudio 2024.04.1 + 748. Heterogeneity was assessed using I² statistics. Sensitivity analysis was performed with the leave-one-out test. The risk of bias was assessed using ROBINS-I for non-randomized studies. Publication bias was assessed using a funnel plot and Furuya-Kanamori's Doi plot. Exclusion criteria were cases of intradural anterior petrosal approaches and articles where the data concerning approach-related complications could not be extracted. Our systematic search yielded 1098 articles, of which five met the inclusion criteria, encompassing 404 patients. The overall CSF leak rate was estimated at 3.15% (95% CI: 0.07-8.92), with a lower reoperation rate for CSF leaks at 0.40%. Other complications included temporal lobe injury (1.12%), postoperative seizures (2.42%), approach-related facial palsy (2.23%), and approach-related hearing loss (1.04%). Notably, the incidence of postoperative dry eye was reduced from 6.04 to 2.36% following refinements in surgical practices. The EAPA is a safe procedure with a low complication rate when performed in specialized centers. Outcomes depend on meticulous technique, experienced teams, comprehensive preoperative assessment, and neurophysiological monitoring. This meta-analysis is the first to focus on approach-related complications of EAPA, providing valuable insights to enhance surgical safety and patient care.</p>","PeriodicalId":19184,"journal":{"name":"Neurosurgical Review","volume":"48 1","pages":"651"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Approach-related complications of extradural anterior petrosal approach: systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Guilherme Gago, Antonio Strangio, Frederico de Lima Gibbon, Marc-Olivier Comeau, Fernando Cotrim Gomes, Pierre-Olivier Champagne\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10143-025-03813-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The extradural anterior petrosal approach (EAPA) is a surgical technique utilized to access pathologies in the petroclival region and the anterolateral aspect of the brainstem, allowing enhanced visualization and maneuverability. Despite its advantages, the EAPA is associated with significant potential complications that remain a topic of debate within the neurosurgical community. This meta-analysis aims to evaluate the incidence of approach-related complications following EAPA. A systematic literature review was conducted across several databases, including PubMed, Scopus, and Embase. The primary outcome was cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak, while secondary outcomes included facial palsy, hearing loss, temporal lobe injury, postoperative seizures, and dry eye. Statistical analysis was performed using RStudio 2024.04.1 + 748. Heterogeneity was assessed using I² statistics. Sensitivity analysis was performed with the leave-one-out test. The risk of bias was assessed using ROBINS-I for non-randomized studies. Publication bias was assessed using a funnel plot and Furuya-Kanamori's Doi plot. Exclusion criteria were cases of intradural anterior petrosal approaches and articles where the data concerning approach-related complications could not be extracted. Our systematic search yielded 1098 articles, of which five met the inclusion criteria, encompassing 404 patients. The overall CSF leak rate was estimated at 3.15% (95% CI: 0.07-8.92), with a lower reoperation rate for CSF leaks at 0.40%. Other complications included temporal lobe injury (1.12%), postoperative seizures (2.42%), approach-related facial palsy (2.23%), and approach-related hearing loss (1.04%). Notably, the incidence of postoperative dry eye was reduced from 6.04 to 2.36% following refinements in surgical practices. The EAPA is a safe procedure with a low complication rate when performed in specialized centers. Outcomes depend on meticulous technique, experienced teams, comprehensive preoperative assessment, and neurophysiological monitoring. This meta-analysis is the first to focus on approach-related complications of EAPA, providing valuable insights to enhance surgical safety and patient care.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19184,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neurosurgical Review\",\"volume\":\"48 1\",\"pages\":\"651\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neurosurgical Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-025-03813-6\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurosurgical Review","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-025-03813-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

硬膜外岩前入路(EAPA)是一种用于进入岩斜坡区和脑干前外侧病变的外科技术,可增强可视化和可操作性。尽管EAPA有其优点,但其潜在的并发症仍是神经外科医学界争论的话题。本荟萃分析旨在评估EAPA术后入路相关并发症的发生率。对包括PubMed、Scopus和Embase在内的多个数据库进行了系统的文献综述。主要结局是脑脊液(CSF)泄漏,次要结局包括面瘫、听力损失、颞叶损伤、术后癫痫发作和干眼。采用RStudio 2024.04.1 + 748进行统计分析。采用I²统计量评估异质性。采用留一试验进行敏感性分析。对非随机研究使用ROBINS-I评估偏倚风险。采用漏斗图和Furuya-Kanamori的Doi图评估发表偏倚。排除标准是硬膜内岩前入路病例和无法提取入路相关并发症资料的文章。我们的系统检索得到1098篇文章,其中5篇符合纳入标准,涉及404例患者。总体脑脊液泄漏率估计为3.15% (95% CI: 0.07-8.92),脑脊液泄漏的再手术率较低,为0.40%。其他并发症包括颞叶损伤(1.12%)、术后癫痫发作(2.42%)、入路相关面瘫(2.23%)和入路相关听力损失(1.04%)。值得注意的是,术后干眼发生率从6.04下降到2.36%。EAPA是一种安全的手术,在专业中心进行时并发症发生率低。结果取决于细致的技术、经验丰富的团队、全面的术前评估和神经生理监测。这项荟萃分析首次关注了EAPA的手术方法相关并发症,为提高手术安全性和患者护理提供了有价值的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Approach-related complications of extradural anterior petrosal approach: systematic review and meta-analysis.

The extradural anterior petrosal approach (EAPA) is a surgical technique utilized to access pathologies in the petroclival region and the anterolateral aspect of the brainstem, allowing enhanced visualization and maneuverability. Despite its advantages, the EAPA is associated with significant potential complications that remain a topic of debate within the neurosurgical community. This meta-analysis aims to evaluate the incidence of approach-related complications following EAPA. A systematic literature review was conducted across several databases, including PubMed, Scopus, and Embase. The primary outcome was cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) leak, while secondary outcomes included facial palsy, hearing loss, temporal lobe injury, postoperative seizures, and dry eye. Statistical analysis was performed using RStudio 2024.04.1 + 748. Heterogeneity was assessed using I² statistics. Sensitivity analysis was performed with the leave-one-out test. The risk of bias was assessed using ROBINS-I for non-randomized studies. Publication bias was assessed using a funnel plot and Furuya-Kanamori's Doi plot. Exclusion criteria were cases of intradural anterior petrosal approaches and articles where the data concerning approach-related complications could not be extracted. Our systematic search yielded 1098 articles, of which five met the inclusion criteria, encompassing 404 patients. The overall CSF leak rate was estimated at 3.15% (95% CI: 0.07-8.92), with a lower reoperation rate for CSF leaks at 0.40%. Other complications included temporal lobe injury (1.12%), postoperative seizures (2.42%), approach-related facial palsy (2.23%), and approach-related hearing loss (1.04%). Notably, the incidence of postoperative dry eye was reduced from 6.04 to 2.36% following refinements in surgical practices. The EAPA is a safe procedure with a low complication rate when performed in specialized centers. Outcomes depend on meticulous technique, experienced teams, comprehensive preoperative assessment, and neurophysiological monitoring. This meta-analysis is the first to focus on approach-related complications of EAPA, providing valuable insights to enhance surgical safety and patient care.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Neurosurgical Review
Neurosurgical Review 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
7.10%
发文量
191
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The goal of Neurosurgical Review is to provide a forum for comprehensive reviews on current issues in neurosurgery. Each issue contains up to three reviews, reflecting all important aspects of one topic (a disease or a surgical approach). Comments by a panel of experts within the same issue complete the topic. By providing comprehensive coverage of one topic per issue, Neurosurgical Review combines the topicality of professional journals with the indepth treatment of a monograph. Original papers of high quality are also welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信