颈椎前路椎间盘切除术融合术后常规x线片的作用。

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Megan M Finneran, Emilio M Nardone
{"title":"颈椎前路椎间盘切除术融合术后常规x线片的作用。","authors":"Megan M Finneran, Emilio M Nardone","doi":"10.1007/s10143-025-03794-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) is a procedure commonly performed for cervical radiculopathy or myelopathy. No consensus exists regarding the necessity of radiographs in the postoperative period to review for possible complication. The aim of this study was to assess the role of routine radiographs following one- and two-level ACDF with a primary focus to determine if they would alter the treatment course.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The authors conducted a single-surgeon, multi-institution randomized controlled study of adult patients who underwent one- or two-level ACDF between June 2019 and January 2023. Group 1 underwent lateral cervical radiographs two weeks and three months postoperatively; Group 2 underwent radiograph only when clinically indicated. Demographics, radiographic data, and post-treatment outcomes at a minimum follow-up of three months are reported.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Two hundred surgeries on 200 patients involving 298 intervertebral disc levels were included. One hundred five patients were randomized to Group 1 and 95 were randomized to Group 2. The majority of patients had no complaints two weeks (72.4% in Group 1 and 80.0% in Group 2) and three months (93.3% in Group 1 and 91.6% in Group 2) postoperatively. Only one asymptomatic patient, with known osteoporosis, had a finding on radiograph that prompted a change in treatment course with addition of a cervical collar.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings suggest that patients with osteoporosis may be considered for routine radiographs postoperatively, regardless of clinical presentation. However, outside this population, we recommend the use of radiographs be guided by symptomatology rather than as standard procedure.</p>","PeriodicalId":19184,"journal":{"name":"Neurosurgical Review","volume":"48 1","pages":"648"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Role of routine radiographs after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion.\",\"authors\":\"Megan M Finneran, Emilio M Nardone\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10143-025-03794-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) is a procedure commonly performed for cervical radiculopathy or myelopathy. No consensus exists regarding the necessity of radiographs in the postoperative period to review for possible complication. The aim of this study was to assess the role of routine radiographs following one- and two-level ACDF with a primary focus to determine if they would alter the treatment course.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The authors conducted a single-surgeon, multi-institution randomized controlled study of adult patients who underwent one- or two-level ACDF between June 2019 and January 2023. Group 1 underwent lateral cervical radiographs two weeks and three months postoperatively; Group 2 underwent radiograph only when clinically indicated. Demographics, radiographic data, and post-treatment outcomes at a minimum follow-up of three months are reported.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Two hundred surgeries on 200 patients involving 298 intervertebral disc levels were included. One hundred five patients were randomized to Group 1 and 95 were randomized to Group 2. The majority of patients had no complaints two weeks (72.4% in Group 1 and 80.0% in Group 2) and three months (93.3% in Group 1 and 91.6% in Group 2) postoperatively. Only one asymptomatic patient, with known osteoporosis, had a finding on radiograph that prompted a change in treatment course with addition of a cervical collar.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings suggest that patients with osteoporosis may be considered for routine radiographs postoperatively, regardless of clinical presentation. However, outside this population, we recommend the use of radiographs be guided by symptomatology rather than as standard procedure.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19184,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Neurosurgical Review\",\"volume\":\"48 1\",\"pages\":\"648\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Neurosurgical Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-025-03794-6\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurosurgical Review","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10143-025-03794-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:前路颈椎椎间盘切除术和融合术(ACDF)是治疗颈椎神经根病或脊髓病的常用手术。关于术后检查可能并发症的x线片的必要性尚未达成共识。本研究的目的是评估常规x线片在一级和二级ACDF后的作用,主要目的是确定它们是否会改变治疗过程。方法:作者对2019年6月至2023年1月期间接受一级或二级ACDF的成年患者进行了一项单外科医生、多机构随机对照研究。组1术后2周、3个月行颈椎侧位x线片检查;2组仅在临床指征时进行x线片检查。报告了至少随访3个月的人口统计学、放射学数据和治疗后结果。结果:纳入200例患者200例手术,涉及298个椎间盘节段。105例患者随机分为第一组,95例患者随机分为第二组。大多数患者术后2周(组1 72.4%,组2 80.0%)和3个月(组1 93.3%,组2 91.6%)无主诉。只有一名无症状的骨质疏松症患者,在x光片上发现了这一发现,促使我们改变了治疗过程,增加了颈套。结论:我们的研究结果表明,骨质疏松症患者可以考虑术后常规x线片,无论临床表现如何。然而,在这一人群之外,我们建议根据症状使用x线片,而不是作为标准程序。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Role of routine radiographs after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion.

Background: Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) is a procedure commonly performed for cervical radiculopathy or myelopathy. No consensus exists regarding the necessity of radiographs in the postoperative period to review for possible complication. The aim of this study was to assess the role of routine radiographs following one- and two-level ACDF with a primary focus to determine if they would alter the treatment course.

Methods: The authors conducted a single-surgeon, multi-institution randomized controlled study of adult patients who underwent one- or two-level ACDF between June 2019 and January 2023. Group 1 underwent lateral cervical radiographs two weeks and three months postoperatively; Group 2 underwent radiograph only when clinically indicated. Demographics, radiographic data, and post-treatment outcomes at a minimum follow-up of three months are reported.

Results: Two hundred surgeries on 200 patients involving 298 intervertebral disc levels were included. One hundred five patients were randomized to Group 1 and 95 were randomized to Group 2. The majority of patients had no complaints two weeks (72.4% in Group 1 and 80.0% in Group 2) and three months (93.3% in Group 1 and 91.6% in Group 2) postoperatively. Only one asymptomatic patient, with known osteoporosis, had a finding on radiograph that prompted a change in treatment course with addition of a cervical collar.

Conclusion: Our findings suggest that patients with osteoporosis may be considered for routine radiographs postoperatively, regardless of clinical presentation. However, outside this population, we recommend the use of radiographs be guided by symptomatology rather than as standard procedure.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Neurosurgical Review
Neurosurgical Review 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
7.10%
发文量
191
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The goal of Neurosurgical Review is to provide a forum for comprehensive reviews on current issues in neurosurgery. Each issue contains up to three reviews, reflecting all important aspects of one topic (a disease or a surgical approach). Comments by a panel of experts within the same issue complete the topic. By providing comprehensive coverage of one topic per issue, Neurosurgical Review combines the topicality of professional journals with the indepth treatment of a monograph. Original papers of high quality are also welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信