Roopjit Sahi, Manesha Putra, Greggory R DeVore, John C Hobbins
{"title":"胎儿生长受限妊娠晚期子宫动脉多普勒检测的临床意义。","authors":"Roopjit Sahi, Manesha Putra, Greggory R DeVore, John C Hobbins","doi":"10.1002/jum.70064","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To analyze the third trimester uterine artery Dopplers with other tools of fetal surveillance in prediction of in utero cardiac function measures and adverse neonatal outcomes in fetal growth-restricted pregnancies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Pregnancies with severe or non-severe fetal growth restriction (FGR) (per SMFM guidelines) have been analyzed from an ongoing observational FGR study at a University of Colorado high-risk perinatal center. Fetal biometric values, Doppler indices, and cardiac variables were analyzed in both groups. Different Doppler combinations were tested to identify the best predictors for adverse fetal cardiac and neonatal outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In a cohort of 102 FGR pregnancies, the incidence of abnormal uterine artery Dopplers was 27.5% in the non-severe FGR group and 25.8% in the severe FGR group. Abnormal uterine artery pulsatility index (PI) had a strong association with abnormal umbilical artery PI, with an odds ratio (OR) of 4.51 (1.32-16.2) (P = .01), and the cerebroplacental ratio had an inverse association with elevated uterine artery PI (OR 0.11, 0.01-0.69, P = .03). The odds of birthweight being less than 10th percentile with abnormal uterine artery PI was 9.2 (1.93-43.6, P = .005) in the non-severe FGR group. Fetuses in the severe FGR group with abnormal uterine artery PI had a higher incidence of rounder fetal hearts (OR 4.42, 1.09-17.9, P = .03).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although elevated uterine artery Dopplers are significantly associated with lower birthweight and rounder fetal hearts, the lack of strong correlation with other outcome variables indicates that the role of uterine artery Dopplers in fetal growth restriction needs further investigation in studies with a larger sample size.</p>","PeriodicalId":17563,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Testing the Clinical Significance of Third Trimester Uterine Artery Dopplers in Pregnancies With Fetal Growth Restriction.\",\"authors\":\"Roopjit Sahi, Manesha Putra, Greggory R DeVore, John C Hobbins\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jum.70064\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To analyze the third trimester uterine artery Dopplers with other tools of fetal surveillance in prediction of in utero cardiac function measures and adverse neonatal outcomes in fetal growth-restricted pregnancies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Pregnancies with severe or non-severe fetal growth restriction (FGR) (per SMFM guidelines) have been analyzed from an ongoing observational FGR study at a University of Colorado high-risk perinatal center. Fetal biometric values, Doppler indices, and cardiac variables were analyzed in both groups. Different Doppler combinations were tested to identify the best predictors for adverse fetal cardiac and neonatal outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In a cohort of 102 FGR pregnancies, the incidence of abnormal uterine artery Dopplers was 27.5% in the non-severe FGR group and 25.8% in the severe FGR group. Abnormal uterine artery pulsatility index (PI) had a strong association with abnormal umbilical artery PI, with an odds ratio (OR) of 4.51 (1.32-16.2) (P = .01), and the cerebroplacental ratio had an inverse association with elevated uterine artery PI (OR 0.11, 0.01-0.69, P = .03). The odds of birthweight being less than 10th percentile with abnormal uterine artery PI was 9.2 (1.93-43.6, P = .005) in the non-severe FGR group. Fetuses in the severe FGR group with abnormal uterine artery PI had a higher incidence of rounder fetal hearts (OR 4.42, 1.09-17.9, P = .03).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although elevated uterine artery Dopplers are significantly associated with lower birthweight and rounder fetal hearts, the lack of strong correlation with other outcome variables indicates that the role of uterine artery Dopplers in fetal growth restriction needs further investigation in studies with a larger sample size.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17563,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/jum.70064\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ACOUSTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jum.70064","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ACOUSTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Testing the Clinical Significance of Third Trimester Uterine Artery Dopplers in Pregnancies With Fetal Growth Restriction.
Objectives: To analyze the third trimester uterine artery Dopplers with other tools of fetal surveillance in prediction of in utero cardiac function measures and adverse neonatal outcomes in fetal growth-restricted pregnancies.
Methods: Pregnancies with severe or non-severe fetal growth restriction (FGR) (per SMFM guidelines) have been analyzed from an ongoing observational FGR study at a University of Colorado high-risk perinatal center. Fetal biometric values, Doppler indices, and cardiac variables were analyzed in both groups. Different Doppler combinations were tested to identify the best predictors for adverse fetal cardiac and neonatal outcomes.
Results: In a cohort of 102 FGR pregnancies, the incidence of abnormal uterine artery Dopplers was 27.5% in the non-severe FGR group and 25.8% in the severe FGR group. Abnormal uterine artery pulsatility index (PI) had a strong association with abnormal umbilical artery PI, with an odds ratio (OR) of 4.51 (1.32-16.2) (P = .01), and the cerebroplacental ratio had an inverse association with elevated uterine artery PI (OR 0.11, 0.01-0.69, P = .03). The odds of birthweight being less than 10th percentile with abnormal uterine artery PI was 9.2 (1.93-43.6, P = .005) in the non-severe FGR group. Fetuses in the severe FGR group with abnormal uterine artery PI had a higher incidence of rounder fetal hearts (OR 4.42, 1.09-17.9, P = .03).
Conclusion: Although elevated uterine artery Dopplers are significantly associated with lower birthweight and rounder fetal hearts, the lack of strong correlation with other outcome variables indicates that the role of uterine artery Dopplers in fetal growth restriction needs further investigation in studies with a larger sample size.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine (JUM) is dedicated to the rapid, accurate publication of original articles dealing with all aspects of medical ultrasound, particularly its direct application to patient care but also relevant basic science, advances in instrumentation, and biological effects. The journal is an official publication of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine and publishes articles in a variety of categories, including Original Research papers, Review Articles, Pictorial Essays, Technical Innovations, Case Series, Letters to the Editor, and more, from an international bevy of countries in a continual effort to showcase and promote advances in the ultrasound community.
Represented through these efforts are a wide variety of disciplines of ultrasound, including, but not limited to:
-Basic Science-
Breast Ultrasound-
Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasound-
Dermatology-
Echocardiography-
Elastography-
Emergency Medicine-
Fetal Echocardiography-
Gastrointestinal Ultrasound-
General and Abdominal Ultrasound-
Genitourinary Ultrasound-
Gynecologic Ultrasound-
Head and Neck Ultrasound-
High Frequency Clinical and Preclinical Imaging-
Interventional-Intraoperative Ultrasound-
Musculoskeletal Ultrasound-
Neurosonology-
Obstetric Ultrasound-
Ophthalmologic Ultrasound-
Pediatric Ultrasound-
Point-of-Care Ultrasound-
Public Policy-
Superficial Structures-
Therapeutic Ultrasound-
Ultrasound Education-
Ultrasound in Global Health-
Urologic Ultrasound-
Vascular Ultrasound