平行离线呼吸采样用于挥发性有机化合物代谢物的交叉验证分析。

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q2 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Eray Schulz, Mariana Maciel, Zhige Wang, Shivaum Heranjal, Xiaowen Liu, Sha Cao, Ryan F Relich, Mark Woollam, Mangilal Agarwal
{"title":"平行离线呼吸采样用于挥发性有机化合物代谢物的交叉验证分析。","authors":"Eray Schulz, Mariana Maciel, Zhige Wang, Shivaum Heranjal, Xiaowen Liu, Sha Cao, Ryan F Relich, Mark Woollam, Mangilal Agarwal","doi":"10.1007/s11306-025-02340-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in breath are potential biomarkers for medical conditions that may be used for non-invasive health monitoring. One challenge that still exists is determining the fidelity of reported VOC biomarkers. The lack of universally accepted sampling methods makes it difficult to identify reliable candidates, thus allowing for the potential of false discovery.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The purpose of this study was to robustly profile VOCs in breath samples collected from relatively healthy participants using two offline methods for collection/analysis via solid phase microextraction (SPME) coupled to gas chromatography - mass spectrometry (GC-MS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>158 cross-sectional volunteers provided one-time samples using two methods, one which directly sampled breath via SPME and another which collected breath in Tedlar bags. Using both methods, 10 volunteers provided an additional nine longitudinal samples. Ambient air samples were collected routinely, and a robust data processing schematic was used to ensure high quality reporting of on-breath VOCs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data screening and processing led to the identification of > 30 unique VOCs in both methods. Hierarchical clustering and correlation analyses demonstrated volatile terpene/-oids showed homologous trends in both data sets. Of the 12 VOCs identified using both methods, 11 analytes displayed statistically significant correlations (p < 0.05) in healthy breath samples. Finally, both methods were benchmarked regarding VOC reproducibility, and analyses showed that longitudinally collected samples were more reproducible compared to cross-sectional.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The quantitative results from both sampling methods mirrored each other, thus increasing the reliability and fidelity of VOCs reported along with the results from biostatistical analysis.</p>","PeriodicalId":18506,"journal":{"name":"Metabolomics","volume":"21 5","pages":"138"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12443928/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Parallel Offline Breath Sampling for Cross-Validated Analysis of Volatile Organic Compound Metabolites.\",\"authors\":\"Eray Schulz, Mariana Maciel, Zhige Wang, Shivaum Heranjal, Xiaowen Liu, Sha Cao, Ryan F Relich, Mark Woollam, Mangilal Agarwal\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s11306-025-02340-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in breath are potential biomarkers for medical conditions that may be used for non-invasive health monitoring. One challenge that still exists is determining the fidelity of reported VOC biomarkers. The lack of universally accepted sampling methods makes it difficult to identify reliable candidates, thus allowing for the potential of false discovery.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The purpose of this study was to robustly profile VOCs in breath samples collected from relatively healthy participants using two offline methods for collection/analysis via solid phase microextraction (SPME) coupled to gas chromatography - mass spectrometry (GC-MS).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>158 cross-sectional volunteers provided one-time samples using two methods, one which directly sampled breath via SPME and another which collected breath in Tedlar bags. Using both methods, 10 volunteers provided an additional nine longitudinal samples. Ambient air samples were collected routinely, and a robust data processing schematic was used to ensure high quality reporting of on-breath VOCs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data screening and processing led to the identification of > 30 unique VOCs in both methods. Hierarchical clustering and correlation analyses demonstrated volatile terpene/-oids showed homologous trends in both data sets. Of the 12 VOCs identified using both methods, 11 analytes displayed statistically significant correlations (p < 0.05) in healthy breath samples. Finally, both methods were benchmarked regarding VOC reproducibility, and analyses showed that longitudinally collected samples were more reproducible compared to cross-sectional.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The quantitative results from both sampling methods mirrored each other, thus increasing the reliability and fidelity of VOCs reported along with the results from biostatistical analysis.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18506,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Metabolomics\",\"volume\":\"21 5\",\"pages\":\"138\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12443928/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Metabolomics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11306-025-02340-1\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Metabolomics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11306-025-02340-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:呼吸中的挥发性有机化合物(VOCs)是医疗状况的潜在生物标志物,可用于无创健康监测。一个仍然存在的挑战是确定所报告的VOC生物标志物的保真度。缺乏普遍接受的抽样方法使得难以确定可靠的候选人,从而允许潜在的错误发现。目的:本研究的目的是利用固相微萃取(SPME)和气相色谱-质谱联用(GC-MS)两种离线采集/分析方法,对相对健康参与者的呼吸样本中的挥发性有机化合物进行稳健分析。方法:158名横断面志愿者采用两种方法提供一次性样本,一种是通过SPME直接采集呼吸样本,另一种是通过Tedlar袋采集呼吸样本。使用这两种方法,10名志愿者提供了额外的9个纵向样本。定期收集环境空气样本,并使用稳健的数据处理示意图来确保高质量的呼吸中挥发性有机化合物报告。结果:通过数据筛选和处理,两种方法均可识别出bbbb30种独特的挥发性有机化合物。分层聚类和相关分析表明,挥发性萜/-类化合物在两个数据集中显示出同源趋势。在两种方法鉴定的12种挥发性有机化合物中,有11种分析结果显示出统计学上显著的相关性(p)。结论:两种采样方法的定量结果相互反映,从而提高了报告的挥发性有机化合物与生物统计分析结果的可靠性和保真度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Parallel Offline Breath Sampling for Cross-Validated Analysis of Volatile Organic Compound Metabolites.

Parallel Offline Breath Sampling for Cross-Validated Analysis of Volatile Organic Compound Metabolites.

Parallel Offline Breath Sampling for Cross-Validated Analysis of Volatile Organic Compound Metabolites.

Parallel Offline Breath Sampling for Cross-Validated Analysis of Volatile Organic Compound Metabolites.

Introduction: Volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in breath are potential biomarkers for medical conditions that may be used for non-invasive health monitoring. One challenge that still exists is determining the fidelity of reported VOC biomarkers. The lack of universally accepted sampling methods makes it difficult to identify reliable candidates, thus allowing for the potential of false discovery.

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to robustly profile VOCs in breath samples collected from relatively healthy participants using two offline methods for collection/analysis via solid phase microextraction (SPME) coupled to gas chromatography - mass spectrometry (GC-MS).

Methods: 158 cross-sectional volunteers provided one-time samples using two methods, one which directly sampled breath via SPME and another which collected breath in Tedlar bags. Using both methods, 10 volunteers provided an additional nine longitudinal samples. Ambient air samples were collected routinely, and a robust data processing schematic was used to ensure high quality reporting of on-breath VOCs.

Results: Data screening and processing led to the identification of > 30 unique VOCs in both methods. Hierarchical clustering and correlation analyses demonstrated volatile terpene/-oids showed homologous trends in both data sets. Of the 12 VOCs identified using both methods, 11 analytes displayed statistically significant correlations (p < 0.05) in healthy breath samples. Finally, both methods were benchmarked regarding VOC reproducibility, and analyses showed that longitudinally collected samples were more reproducible compared to cross-sectional.

Conclusions: The quantitative results from both sampling methods mirrored each other, thus increasing the reliability and fidelity of VOCs reported along with the results from biostatistical analysis.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Metabolomics
Metabolomics 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
2.80%
发文量
84
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Metabolomics publishes current research regarding the development of technology platforms for metabolomics. This includes, but is not limited to: metabolomic applications within man, including pre-clinical and clinical pharmacometabolomics for precision medicine metabolic profiling and fingerprinting metabolite target analysis metabolomic applications within animals, plants and microbes transcriptomics and proteomics in systems biology Metabolomics is an indispensable platform for researchers using new post-genomics approaches, to discover networks and interactions between metabolites, pharmaceuticals, SNPs, proteins and more. Its articles go beyond the genome and metabolome, by including original clinical study material together with big data from new emerging technologies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信