导航新领域:保乳手术种子定位技术的奥克兰初步经验。

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Yousr Al-Sheibani, Andrew MacDonald, Kaye Wang
{"title":"导航新领域:保乳手术种子定位技术的奥克兰初步经验。","authors":"Yousr Al-Sheibani, Andrew MacDonald, Kaye Wang","doi":"10.1111/1754-9485.70024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Breast conserving surgery for non-palpable tumours requires imaging-guided localisation, historically achieved with hookwire localisation (HWL). HWL, however, has recognised shortcomings including the need for same-day surgery with associated radiology resource/logistical constraints, psychological impact of wire protrusion, and complications such as wire displacement or fracture. The introduction of novel non-wire surgical marker navigation (SMN) techniques offers promising benefits. This study evaluates the early implementation of SMN (Sirius Pintuition and Merit SAVISCOUT systems) in one radiology department in Auckland, New Zealand.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a retrospective cohort study evaluating surgical outcomes in patients with non-palpable tumours who underwent preoperative localisation between May 2023 and June 2024. Three groups were compared: two cohorts who underwent SMN in the form of Pintution (n = 36) and SAVISCOUT (n = 42) and one who underwent HWL (n = 35). Surgical outcomes assessed included histological margin status and rates of re-excision. Technical challenges and complications were recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was no significant difference in surgical outcomes between HWL and SMN groups. The 'surgery complete' rate was 89% in the HWL group, 82% in the Pintuition group, and 97% in the SAVISCOUT group (p = 0.10). Technique failure occurred in five cases of SMN (6%) due to inadequate seed position and one case of HWL (3%) due to wire displacement.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>SMN in the form of Pintuition and SAVISCOUT demonstrate comparable surgical outcomes to HWL, whilst also offering advantages in scheduling flexibility and resource utilisation. A small rate of technical failure highlights the operator learning curve and need for appropriate training.</p>","PeriodicalId":16218,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Navigating New Frontiers: Initial Auckland Experience of Seed Localisation Techniques for Breast Conserving Surgery.\",\"authors\":\"Yousr Al-Sheibani, Andrew MacDonald, Kaye Wang\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/1754-9485.70024\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Breast conserving surgery for non-palpable tumours requires imaging-guided localisation, historically achieved with hookwire localisation (HWL). HWL, however, has recognised shortcomings including the need for same-day surgery with associated radiology resource/logistical constraints, psychological impact of wire protrusion, and complications such as wire displacement or fracture. The introduction of novel non-wire surgical marker navigation (SMN) techniques offers promising benefits. This study evaluates the early implementation of SMN (Sirius Pintuition and Merit SAVISCOUT systems) in one radiology department in Auckland, New Zealand.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a retrospective cohort study evaluating surgical outcomes in patients with non-palpable tumours who underwent preoperative localisation between May 2023 and June 2024. Three groups were compared: two cohorts who underwent SMN in the form of Pintution (n = 36) and SAVISCOUT (n = 42) and one who underwent HWL (n = 35). Surgical outcomes assessed included histological margin status and rates of re-excision. Technical challenges and complications were recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was no significant difference in surgical outcomes between HWL and SMN groups. The 'surgery complete' rate was 89% in the HWL group, 82% in the Pintuition group, and 97% in the SAVISCOUT group (p = 0.10). Technique failure occurred in five cases of SMN (6%) due to inadequate seed position and one case of HWL (3%) due to wire displacement.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>SMN in the form of Pintuition and SAVISCOUT demonstrate comparable surgical outcomes to HWL, whilst also offering advantages in scheduling flexibility and resource utilisation. A small rate of technical failure highlights the operator learning curve and need for appropriate training.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16218,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/1754-9485.70024\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1754-9485.70024","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:保乳手术对不可触及的肿瘤需要成像引导定位,历史上通过钩线定位(HWL)实现。然而,HWL已经认识到其缺点,包括需要当天手术,相关放射学资源/后勤限制,钢丝突出的心理影响,以及钢丝移位或骨折等并发症。引入新的无丝手术标记导航(SMN)技术提供了有希望的好处。本研究评估了SMN (Sirius Pintuition和Merit SAVISCOUT系统)在新西兰奥克兰的一个放射科的早期实施情况。方法:这是一项回顾性队列研究,评估2023年5月至2024年6月期间接受术前定位的非可触及肿瘤患者的手术结果。对三组进行比较:两组以ptution (n = 36)和SAVISCOUT (n = 42)的形式接受SMN,一组接受HWL (n = 35)。评估手术结果包括组织学边缘状态和再切除率。记录技术挑战和并发症。结果:HWL组与SMN组手术结果无显著差异。HWL组的“手术完成率”为89%,Pintuition组为82%,SAVISCOUT组为97% (p = 0.10)。5例SMN(6%)由于种子位置不合适导致技术失败,1例HWL(3%)由于钢丝移位导致技术失败。结论:Pintuition和SAVISCOUT形式的SMN表现出与HWL相当的手术效果,同时在调度灵活性和资源利用方面也具有优势。小的技术失败率凸显了操作员的学习曲线和对适当培训的需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Navigating New Frontiers: Initial Auckland Experience of Seed Localisation Techniques for Breast Conserving Surgery.

Introduction: Breast conserving surgery for non-palpable tumours requires imaging-guided localisation, historically achieved with hookwire localisation (HWL). HWL, however, has recognised shortcomings including the need for same-day surgery with associated radiology resource/logistical constraints, psychological impact of wire protrusion, and complications such as wire displacement or fracture. The introduction of novel non-wire surgical marker navigation (SMN) techniques offers promising benefits. This study evaluates the early implementation of SMN (Sirius Pintuition and Merit SAVISCOUT systems) in one radiology department in Auckland, New Zealand.

Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study evaluating surgical outcomes in patients with non-palpable tumours who underwent preoperative localisation between May 2023 and June 2024. Three groups were compared: two cohorts who underwent SMN in the form of Pintution (n = 36) and SAVISCOUT (n = 42) and one who underwent HWL (n = 35). Surgical outcomes assessed included histological margin status and rates of re-excision. Technical challenges and complications were recorded.

Results: There was no significant difference in surgical outcomes between HWL and SMN groups. The 'surgery complete' rate was 89% in the HWL group, 82% in the Pintuition group, and 97% in the SAVISCOUT group (p = 0.10). Technique failure occurred in five cases of SMN (6%) due to inadequate seed position and one case of HWL (3%) due to wire displacement.

Conclusion: SMN in the form of Pintuition and SAVISCOUT demonstrate comparable surgical outcomes to HWL, whilst also offering advantages in scheduling flexibility and resource utilisation. A small rate of technical failure highlights the operator learning curve and need for appropriate training.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
6.20%
发文量
133
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology (formerly Australasian Radiology) is the official journal of The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Radiologists, publishing articles of scientific excellence in radiology and radiation oncology. Manuscripts are judged on the basis of their contribution of original data and ideas or interpretation. All articles are peer reviewed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信