SATA-LRS腹腔镜器械在人尸体模型中的临床前应用研究。

IF 2 4区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Tomas Lenssen, Roelf R Postema, Christian Camenzuli, Jean Calleja-Agius, Jenny Dankelman, Tim Horeman-Franse
{"title":"SATA-LRS腹腔镜器械在人尸体模型中的临床前应用研究。","authors":"Tomas Lenssen, Roelf R Postema, Christian Camenzuli, Jean Calleja-Agius, Jenny Dankelman, Tim Horeman-Franse","doi":"10.1080/13645706.2025.2554077","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To validate whether the SATA-LRS, a novel reusable articulating laparoscopic instrument, fits surgical practice, a pre-clinical study was performed.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirteen medical doctors used the instrument in a laparoscopic endoscopic inguinal hernia repair (TEP)-like task inside a cadaver. A set of sensors on the instrument handle detected motion and articulation of the instrument tip. Data from the sensors and video recordings were used to assess the amount and type of movement of the instrument and the time spent on tasks. questionnaire was used to gain insight into the participants' perception of the contextual factors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was no difference between task time and instrument tip velocities when using articulation (or not) and all participants used articulation at least half of the task time. Instrument-handle movement, indicating the user's hand and arm movement, was significantly reduced when using articulation. The questionnaire indicated strong acceptance of the instrument and the experimental setup, and a desire to use the instrument in surgery by most participants.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The added articulation feature of the SATA-LRS instrument was deemed beneficial by the participants, showed no increased handling complexity or time spent on the task and was used frequently when enabled, indicating intuitiveness.</p>","PeriodicalId":18537,"journal":{"name":"Minimally Invasive Therapy & Allied Technologies","volume":" ","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A pre-clinical application study of the SATA-LRS laparoscopic instrument in a human cadaver model.\",\"authors\":\"Tomas Lenssen, Roelf R Postema, Christian Camenzuli, Jean Calleja-Agius, Jenny Dankelman, Tim Horeman-Franse\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13645706.2025.2554077\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>To validate whether the SATA-LRS, a novel reusable articulating laparoscopic instrument, fits surgical practice, a pre-clinical study was performed.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirteen medical doctors used the instrument in a laparoscopic endoscopic inguinal hernia repair (TEP)-like task inside a cadaver. A set of sensors on the instrument handle detected motion and articulation of the instrument tip. Data from the sensors and video recordings were used to assess the amount and type of movement of the instrument and the time spent on tasks. questionnaire was used to gain insight into the participants' perception of the contextual factors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was no difference between task time and instrument tip velocities when using articulation (or not) and all participants used articulation at least half of the task time. Instrument-handle movement, indicating the user's hand and arm movement, was significantly reduced when using articulation. The questionnaire indicated strong acceptance of the instrument and the experimental setup, and a desire to use the instrument in surgery by most participants.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The added articulation feature of the SATA-LRS instrument was deemed beneficial by the participants, showed no increased handling complexity or time spent on the task and was used frequently when enabled, indicating intuitiveness.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18537,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Minimally Invasive Therapy & Allied Technologies\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-9\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Minimally Invasive Therapy & Allied Technologies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13645706.2025.2554077\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Minimally Invasive Therapy & Allied Technologies","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13645706.2025.2554077","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:为了验证SATA-LRS,一种新型的可重复使用的铰式腹腔镜器械,是否适合手术实践,进行了一项临床前研究。方法:13名医生使用该器械在尸体内进行腹腔镜内镜下腹股沟疝修补术(TEP)样手术。仪器手柄上的一组传感器检测仪器尖端的运动和关节。来自传感器和录像的数据被用来评估仪器移动的数量和类型以及在任务上花费的时间。采用问卷调查的方式了解被试对情境因素的认知。结果:当使用发音(或不使用发音)时,任务时间和仪器尖端速度没有差异,所有参与者在任务时间中至少有一半使用发音。当使用关节时,指示使用者手和手臂运动的仪器手柄运动显著减少。问卷调查表明,大多数参与者强烈接受该仪器和实验装置,并希望在手术中使用该仪器。结论:参与者认为,sat - lrs仪器增加的发音功能是有益的,没有增加处理复杂性或花费在任务上的时间,并且在启用时经常使用,表明了直观性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A pre-clinical application study of the SATA-LRS laparoscopic instrument in a human cadaver model.

Background: To validate whether the SATA-LRS, a novel reusable articulating laparoscopic instrument, fits surgical practice, a pre-clinical study was performed.

Methods: Thirteen medical doctors used the instrument in a laparoscopic endoscopic inguinal hernia repair (TEP)-like task inside a cadaver. A set of sensors on the instrument handle detected motion and articulation of the instrument tip. Data from the sensors and video recordings were used to assess the amount and type of movement of the instrument and the time spent on tasks. questionnaire was used to gain insight into the participants' perception of the contextual factors.

Results: There was no difference between task time and instrument tip velocities when using articulation (or not) and all participants used articulation at least half of the task time. Instrument-handle movement, indicating the user's hand and arm movement, was significantly reduced when using articulation. The questionnaire indicated strong acceptance of the instrument and the experimental setup, and a desire to use the instrument in surgery by most participants.

Conclusions: The added articulation feature of the SATA-LRS instrument was deemed beneficial by the participants, showed no increased handling complexity or time spent on the task and was used frequently when enabled, indicating intuitiveness.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
5.90%
发文量
39
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Minimally Invasive Therapy and Allied Technologies (MITAT) is an international forum for endoscopic surgeons, interventional radiologists and industrial instrument manufacturers. It is the official journal of the Society for Medical Innovation and Technology (SMIT) whose membership includes representatives from a broad spectrum of medical specialities, instrument manufacturing and research. The journal brings the latest developments and innovations in minimally invasive therapy to its readers. What makes Minimally Invasive Therapy and Allied Technologies unique is that we publish one or two special issues each year, which are devoted to a specific theme. Key topics covered by the journal include: interventional radiology, endoscopic surgery, imaging technology, manipulators and robotics for surgery and education and training for MIS.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信