秘密购物者调查显示,狗通常可以合理地获得预防性兽医预约,在农村地区和其他异常地区存在显著差距。

IF 1.8 2区 农林科学 Q2 VETERINARY SCIENCES
Anisha Aggarwal, Ysabella Ramirez-Guillen, Simon F Haeder
{"title":"秘密购物者调查显示,狗通常可以合理地获得预防性兽医预约,在农村地区和其他异常地区存在显著差距。","authors":"Anisha Aggarwal, Ysabella Ramirez-Guillen, Simon F Haeder","doi":"10.2460/javma.25.05.0311","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess barriers to veterinary care related to contact-information accuracy, appointment availability, and geographic accessibility.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We fielded a secret shopper survey of general veterinary practices in 6 states (California, Minnesota, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Texas, and Washington) from February 4 to April 11, 2025. Practices were randomly selected based on addresses proportional to county populations. Callers posing as dog owners used Google Maps to identify practices and collected observational data. We relied on descriptive analyses and logit and ordinary least-square models to analyze the data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Simulated dog owners reached out to 5,053 veterinary practices and were able to get an appointment in 67.0% of attempts. Primary reasons for failures were inability to connect with staffers (15.1%), excessive hold times (8.2%), or staff refusal (1.9%). Inaccuracies occurred in only 2.2% of cases. In 3.9% of cases, veterinarians lacked the capacity to accept additional patients. When successful, simulated dog owners on average had to wait 6.36 days for an appointment and travel 11.1 minutes or 6.4 miles. Outliers experienced substantial barriers to care. We identified substantial differences by state and rurality. Other common correlates of access such as population size, poverty, and median income generally had no substantive effect.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings indicated that wellness appointments are generally available to most dog owners, but rural residents and outliers may experience delays and travels. Inability to connect with staffers at times may provide additional challenges.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>Barriers to care may impact animal and human welfare and the professional experiences of veterinarians.</p>","PeriodicalId":14658,"journal":{"name":"Javma-journal of The American Veterinary Medical Association","volume":" ","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Secret shopper survey reveals generally reasonable access to preventive veterinary appointments for dogs, with notable gaps in rural areas and for other outliers.\",\"authors\":\"Anisha Aggarwal, Ysabella Ramirez-Guillen, Simon F Haeder\",\"doi\":\"10.2460/javma.25.05.0311\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess barriers to veterinary care related to contact-information accuracy, appointment availability, and geographic accessibility.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We fielded a secret shopper survey of general veterinary practices in 6 states (California, Minnesota, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Texas, and Washington) from February 4 to April 11, 2025. Practices were randomly selected based on addresses proportional to county populations. Callers posing as dog owners used Google Maps to identify practices and collected observational data. We relied on descriptive analyses and logit and ordinary least-square models to analyze the data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Simulated dog owners reached out to 5,053 veterinary practices and were able to get an appointment in 67.0% of attempts. Primary reasons for failures were inability to connect with staffers (15.1%), excessive hold times (8.2%), or staff refusal (1.9%). Inaccuracies occurred in only 2.2% of cases. In 3.9% of cases, veterinarians lacked the capacity to accept additional patients. When successful, simulated dog owners on average had to wait 6.36 days for an appointment and travel 11.1 minutes or 6.4 miles. Outliers experienced substantial barriers to care. We identified substantial differences by state and rurality. Other common correlates of access such as population size, poverty, and median income generally had no substantive effect.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings indicated that wellness appointments are generally available to most dog owners, but rural residents and outliers may experience delays and travels. Inability to connect with staffers at times may provide additional challenges.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>Barriers to care may impact animal and human welfare and the professional experiences of veterinarians.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14658,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Javma-journal of The American Veterinary Medical Association\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-8\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Javma-journal of The American Veterinary Medical Association\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2460/javma.25.05.0311\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"VETERINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Javma-journal of The American Veterinary Medical Association","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2460/javma.25.05.0311","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评估兽医护理在联系信息准确性、预约可用性和地理可及性方面的障碍。方法:我们于2025年2月4日至4月11日对6个州(加利福尼亚州、明尼苏达州、俄亥俄州、宾夕法尼亚州、德克萨斯州和华盛顿州)的普通兽医实践进行了秘密购物者调查。实践是根据与县人口成比例的地址随机选择的。冒充狗主人的打电话者使用谷歌地图来识别行为并收集观察数据。我们采用描述性分析、logit和普通最小二乘模型对数据进行分析。结果:模拟狗主人联系了5053家兽医诊所,67.0%的人能够预约。失败的主要原因是无法与员工联系(15.1%),等待时间过长(8.2%)或员工拒绝(1.9%)。只有2.2%的病例不准确。在3.9%的病例中,兽医缺乏接收额外患者的能力。如果成功,模拟的狗主人平均要等6.36天才能预约,旅行11.1分钟或6.4英里。异常值经历了巨大的护理障碍。我们根据州和农村地区确定了实质性的差异。其他常见的获取相关因素,如人口规模、贫困和收入中位数,通常没有实质性影响。结论:我们的研究结果表明,大多数狗主人通常可以进行健康预约,但农村居民和异常值可能会遇到延误和旅行。有时无法与员工建立联系可能会带来额外的挑战。临床相关性:护理障碍可能影响动物和人类福利以及兽医的专业经验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Secret shopper survey reveals generally reasonable access to preventive veterinary appointments for dogs, with notable gaps in rural areas and for other outliers.

Objective: To assess barriers to veterinary care related to contact-information accuracy, appointment availability, and geographic accessibility.

Methods: We fielded a secret shopper survey of general veterinary practices in 6 states (California, Minnesota, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Texas, and Washington) from February 4 to April 11, 2025. Practices were randomly selected based on addresses proportional to county populations. Callers posing as dog owners used Google Maps to identify practices and collected observational data. We relied on descriptive analyses and logit and ordinary least-square models to analyze the data.

Results: Simulated dog owners reached out to 5,053 veterinary practices and were able to get an appointment in 67.0% of attempts. Primary reasons for failures were inability to connect with staffers (15.1%), excessive hold times (8.2%), or staff refusal (1.9%). Inaccuracies occurred in only 2.2% of cases. In 3.9% of cases, veterinarians lacked the capacity to accept additional patients. When successful, simulated dog owners on average had to wait 6.36 days for an appointment and travel 11.1 minutes or 6.4 miles. Outliers experienced substantial barriers to care. We identified substantial differences by state and rurality. Other common correlates of access such as population size, poverty, and median income generally had no substantive effect.

Conclusions: Our findings indicated that wellness appointments are generally available to most dog owners, but rural residents and outliers may experience delays and travels. Inability to connect with staffers at times may provide additional challenges.

Clinical relevance: Barriers to care may impact animal and human welfare and the professional experiences of veterinarians.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
15.80%
发文量
539
审稿时长
6-16 weeks
期刊介绍: Published twice monthly, this peer-reviewed, general scientific journal provides reports of clinical research, feature articles and regular columns of interest to veterinarians in private and public practice. The News and Classified Ad sections are posted online 10 days to two weeks before they are delivered in print.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信