对比2019冠状病毒病大流行期间反亚洲仇恨事件的媒体和执法报告:数据可视化方法。

IF 2 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Young Ji Yoon, Su Hyun Shin, Dongwook Kim, Hee Yun Lee
{"title":"对比2019冠状病毒病大流行期间反亚洲仇恨事件的媒体和执法报告:数据可视化方法。","authors":"Young Ji Yoon, Su Hyun Shin, Dongwook Kim, Hee Yun Lee","doi":"10.2196/70881","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>During the COVID-19 pandemic, anti-Asian hate incidents (AAHIs) increased conspicuously. Literature reports discrepancies in how crimes are reported differently in media and law enforcement data, emphasizing potential biases and inconsistencies in AAHI reporting. Understanding the discrepancies in AAHI reporting between the two sources is crucial for improving documentation procedures and addressing systemic issues in reporting mechanisms.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to (1) present the monthly trends in AAHI counts reported by media and law enforcement data from 2020 to 2021, (2) investigate variations in AAHI counts across states and counties for each year, (3) examine discrepancies in AAHI reporting between the two sources at state and county levels during the same period, and (4) delineate differences in the types and geographic distribution of incidents as represented by the two sources.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study used two data sources for AAHIs, media data (n=1288) from The Asian American Foundation and law enforcement data (n=1086) from the Federal Bureau of Investigation, for the 2020-2021 period. Descriptive analyses were conducted to evaluate monthly trends, state and county-level variations, and differences in incident types and locations. Ratios of reported incidents between the two sources were calculated to assess discrepancies. Temporal trends were contextualized within key sociopolitical events to offer insights into reporting dynamics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>First, both media and law enforcement data presented a sharp increase in reported AAHIs following the first confirmed COVID-19 case in the United States, peaking around March 2020, coinciding with controversial political rhetoric. A second peak occurred from March to April 2021, immediately following the pandemic's peak, and was followed by a decline as the situation improved. Second, in the two data sources, the state-level analysis indicated that California, Texas, New York, and Washington consistently reported the highest AAHI counts. In 2021, there were notable increases in reported incidents in states such as Wisconsin and Illinois. County-level data revealed persistent high counts in California, particularly in Los Angeles County. Ratios of AAHI counts between the two data sources presented significant discrepancies, with higher ratios in California and New York. Finally, the analysis of incident types revealed that media data reported a higher proportion of harassment (477/1288, 37%), while the law enforcement data reported more property-related incidents (239/1086, 22%). Regarding location types, media data frequently reported incidents in public areas (515/1288, 40%) and businesses (361/1288, 28%), whereas law enforcement data reported more incidents occurring in residential settings (201/1086, 18.5%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study highlighted significant trends and disparities in AAHI reporting between media and law enforcement data, underscoring the need for a nuanced understanding of how these incidents were reported. Practice and policy implications suggested fostering community engagement to support Asian communities while enhancing the accuracy and consistency of hate crime reporting.</p>","PeriodicalId":14841,"journal":{"name":"JMIR Formative Research","volume":"9 ","pages":"e70881"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12489402/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparing Media and Law Enforcement Reports on Anti-Asian Hate Incidents During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Data Visualization Approach.\",\"authors\":\"Young Ji Yoon, Su Hyun Shin, Dongwook Kim, Hee Yun Lee\",\"doi\":\"10.2196/70881\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>During the COVID-19 pandemic, anti-Asian hate incidents (AAHIs) increased conspicuously. Literature reports discrepancies in how crimes are reported differently in media and law enforcement data, emphasizing potential biases and inconsistencies in AAHI reporting. Understanding the discrepancies in AAHI reporting between the two sources is crucial for improving documentation procedures and addressing systemic issues in reporting mechanisms.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to (1) present the monthly trends in AAHI counts reported by media and law enforcement data from 2020 to 2021, (2) investigate variations in AAHI counts across states and counties for each year, (3) examine discrepancies in AAHI reporting between the two sources at state and county levels during the same period, and (4) delineate differences in the types and geographic distribution of incidents as represented by the two sources.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study used two data sources for AAHIs, media data (n=1288) from The Asian American Foundation and law enforcement data (n=1086) from the Federal Bureau of Investigation, for the 2020-2021 period. Descriptive analyses were conducted to evaluate monthly trends, state and county-level variations, and differences in incident types and locations. Ratios of reported incidents between the two sources were calculated to assess discrepancies. Temporal trends were contextualized within key sociopolitical events to offer insights into reporting dynamics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>First, both media and law enforcement data presented a sharp increase in reported AAHIs following the first confirmed COVID-19 case in the United States, peaking around March 2020, coinciding with controversial political rhetoric. A second peak occurred from March to April 2021, immediately following the pandemic's peak, and was followed by a decline as the situation improved. Second, in the two data sources, the state-level analysis indicated that California, Texas, New York, and Washington consistently reported the highest AAHI counts. In 2021, there were notable increases in reported incidents in states such as Wisconsin and Illinois. County-level data revealed persistent high counts in California, particularly in Los Angeles County. Ratios of AAHI counts between the two data sources presented significant discrepancies, with higher ratios in California and New York. Finally, the analysis of incident types revealed that media data reported a higher proportion of harassment (477/1288, 37%), while the law enforcement data reported more property-related incidents (239/1086, 22%). Regarding location types, media data frequently reported incidents in public areas (515/1288, 40%) and businesses (361/1288, 28%), whereas law enforcement data reported more incidents occurring in residential settings (201/1086, 18.5%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study highlighted significant trends and disparities in AAHI reporting between media and law enforcement data, underscoring the need for a nuanced understanding of how these incidents were reported. Practice and policy implications suggested fostering community engagement to support Asian communities while enhancing the accuracy and consistency of hate crime reporting.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14841,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JMIR Formative Research\",\"volume\":\"9 \",\"pages\":\"e70881\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12489402/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JMIR Formative Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2196/70881\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMIR Formative Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/70881","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:新冠肺炎疫情期间,反亚洲仇恨事件明显增多。文献报告了媒体和执法数据对犯罪的不同报道方式的差异,强调了AAHI报道中潜在的偏见和不一致。了解两种来源之间AAHI报告的差异对于改进文件编制程序和解决报告机制中的系统性问题至关重要。目的:本研究旨在(1)呈现2020年至2021年媒体和执法数据报道的AAHI计数的月度趋势,(2)调查每年州和县之间AAHI计数的变化,(3)检查同一时期州和县两种来源之间AAHI报告的差异,以及(4)描述两种来源所代表的事件类型和地理分布的差异。方法:本研究使用了两种AAHIs数据来源,即2020-2021年期间亚裔美国人基金会的媒体数据(n=1288)和联邦调查局的执法数据(n=1086)。进行描述性分析以评估每月趋势、州和县的变化以及事件类型和地点的差异。计算了两个来源之间报告的事件的比率,以评估差异。在关键的社会政治事件中,时间趋势被语境化,以提供对报告动态的见解。结果:首先,媒体和执法数据均显示,在美国出现首例新冠肺炎确诊病例后,报告的aahi急剧增加,并在2020年3月左右达到峰值,与有争议的政治言论相吻合。第二次高峰发生在2021年3月至4月,紧随大流行高峰之后,随后随着形势的改善而下降。其次,在这两个数据来源中,州级分析表明,加利福尼亚州、德克萨斯州、纽约州和华盛顿州一直报告的AAHI数量最高。2021年,威斯康星州和伊利诺伊州等州报告的事件显著增加。县级数据显示,加利福尼亚州,特别是洛杉矶县的感染率一直很高。两种数据来源之间的AAHI计数比率存在显著差异,加利福尼亚州和纽约州的比率较高。最后,对事件类型的分析显示,媒体数据报告的骚扰比例更高(477/1288,37%),而执法数据报告的财产相关事件更多(239/1086,22%)。就地点类型而言,媒体数据经常报告的事件发生在公共场所(515/1288,40%)和企业(361/1288,28%),而执法数据报告的事件更多发生在住宅环境(201/1086,18.5%)。结论:本研究突出了媒体和执法数据之间在AAHI报告中的重要趋势和差异,强调了对这些事件的报道方式进行细致入微的理解的必要性。实践和政策影响表明,促进社区参与,支持亚洲社区,同时提高仇恨犯罪报告的准确性和一致性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Comparing Media and Law Enforcement Reports on Anti-Asian Hate Incidents During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Data Visualization Approach.

Comparing Media and Law Enforcement Reports on Anti-Asian Hate Incidents During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Data Visualization Approach.

Comparing Media and Law Enforcement Reports on Anti-Asian Hate Incidents During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Data Visualization Approach.

Comparing Media and Law Enforcement Reports on Anti-Asian Hate Incidents During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Data Visualization Approach.

Background: During the COVID-19 pandemic, anti-Asian hate incidents (AAHIs) increased conspicuously. Literature reports discrepancies in how crimes are reported differently in media and law enforcement data, emphasizing potential biases and inconsistencies in AAHI reporting. Understanding the discrepancies in AAHI reporting between the two sources is crucial for improving documentation procedures and addressing systemic issues in reporting mechanisms.

Objective: This study aimed to (1) present the monthly trends in AAHI counts reported by media and law enforcement data from 2020 to 2021, (2) investigate variations in AAHI counts across states and counties for each year, (3) examine discrepancies in AAHI reporting between the two sources at state and county levels during the same period, and (4) delineate differences in the types and geographic distribution of incidents as represented by the two sources.

Methods: This study used two data sources for AAHIs, media data (n=1288) from The Asian American Foundation and law enforcement data (n=1086) from the Federal Bureau of Investigation, for the 2020-2021 period. Descriptive analyses were conducted to evaluate monthly trends, state and county-level variations, and differences in incident types and locations. Ratios of reported incidents between the two sources were calculated to assess discrepancies. Temporal trends were contextualized within key sociopolitical events to offer insights into reporting dynamics.

Results: First, both media and law enforcement data presented a sharp increase in reported AAHIs following the first confirmed COVID-19 case in the United States, peaking around March 2020, coinciding with controversial political rhetoric. A second peak occurred from March to April 2021, immediately following the pandemic's peak, and was followed by a decline as the situation improved. Second, in the two data sources, the state-level analysis indicated that California, Texas, New York, and Washington consistently reported the highest AAHI counts. In 2021, there were notable increases in reported incidents in states such as Wisconsin and Illinois. County-level data revealed persistent high counts in California, particularly in Los Angeles County. Ratios of AAHI counts between the two data sources presented significant discrepancies, with higher ratios in California and New York. Finally, the analysis of incident types revealed that media data reported a higher proportion of harassment (477/1288, 37%), while the law enforcement data reported more property-related incidents (239/1086, 22%). Regarding location types, media data frequently reported incidents in public areas (515/1288, 40%) and businesses (361/1288, 28%), whereas law enforcement data reported more incidents occurring in residential settings (201/1086, 18.5%).

Conclusions: This study highlighted significant trends and disparities in AAHI reporting between media and law enforcement data, underscoring the need for a nuanced understanding of how these incidents were reported. Practice and policy implications suggested fostering community engagement to support Asian communities while enhancing the accuracy and consistency of hate crime reporting.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
JMIR Formative Research
JMIR Formative Research Medicine-Medicine (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
9.10%
发文量
579
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信