妊娠中期GBS的抗生素治疗与流产风险降低的关系:益生菌干预显示无益处。

IF 0.7 4区 医学 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Mei-Ling Guo, Ya-Nuan Chen, Jian-Hong Fang, Wei-Hong Qi
{"title":"妊娠中期GBS的抗生素治疗与流产风险降低的关系:益生菌干预显示无益处。","authors":"Mei-Ling Guo, Ya-Nuan Chen, Jian-Hong Fang, Wei-Hong Qi","doi":"10.5414/CP204790","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the colonization rate of group B <i>Streptococcus</i> (GBS) during the second trimester of pregnancy, the correlation between GBS infection and miscarriage as well as the impact of intervention on pregnancy outcomes.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>228 GBS-positive pregnant women at 14 - 28 weeks of gestation were divided into 3 groups according to their preferences to receive medical intervention: group A (antibiotic group, n = 54) received oral antibiotic, group B (probiotic group, n = 96) received oral probiotic, and group C (non-intervention group, n = 78) received no drug treatment. 300 GBS-negative pregnant women were selected voluntarily and randomly as the control group (group D). The incidence of miscarriage-related conditions, negative conversion rate of GBS were compared between the 4 groups. Perinatal outcomes were compared between the GBS persistent positive and negative groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>GBS colonization rate was 14.7%. The incidence of threatened miscarriage and miscarriage in group A were 1.85 and 1.85%, both of which were lower than those in group B at 21.9 and 6.3%, and group C at 33.3 and 7.7%, with all differences being statistically significant (p < 0.05). The incidence of threatened miscarriage and miscarriage in group B and group C were significantly higher than those in group D at 3.3 and 2.7% (p < 0.05). The negative conversion rate of GBS in group A was significantly higher than that in group C (14.8 vs. 2.7%, p < 0.05). There was a difference in the incidence of fetal distress, premature delivery, premature rupture of the fetal membrane, chorioamnionitis, and neonatal infection between the continuously positive and negative pregnant women (p < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>GBS colonization rate was 14.7% in the second trimester of pregnancy. GBS infection can increase the risk of threatened miscarriage and miscarriage as well as the risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes. Early intervention with antibiotics can increase the negative conversion rate of GBS, reduce the incidence of threatened miscarriage and miscarriage, and ameliorate the adverse outcome of pregnancy. The effect of probiotic intervention on the negative conversion of GBS was insignificant.</p>","PeriodicalId":13963,"journal":{"name":"International journal of clinical pharmacology and therapeutics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Association of antibiotic treatment for second-trimester GBS with reduced miscarriage risk: Probiotic intervention shows no benefit.\",\"authors\":\"Mei-Ling Guo, Ya-Nuan Chen, Jian-Hong Fang, Wei-Hong Qi\",\"doi\":\"10.5414/CP204790\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the colonization rate of group B <i>Streptococcus</i> (GBS) during the second trimester of pregnancy, the correlation between GBS infection and miscarriage as well as the impact of intervention on pregnancy outcomes.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>228 GBS-positive pregnant women at 14 - 28 weeks of gestation were divided into 3 groups according to their preferences to receive medical intervention: group A (antibiotic group, n = 54) received oral antibiotic, group B (probiotic group, n = 96) received oral probiotic, and group C (non-intervention group, n = 78) received no drug treatment. 300 GBS-negative pregnant women were selected voluntarily and randomly as the control group (group D). The incidence of miscarriage-related conditions, negative conversion rate of GBS were compared between the 4 groups. Perinatal outcomes were compared between the GBS persistent positive and negative groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>GBS colonization rate was 14.7%. The incidence of threatened miscarriage and miscarriage in group A were 1.85 and 1.85%, both of which were lower than those in group B at 21.9 and 6.3%, and group C at 33.3 and 7.7%, with all differences being statistically significant (p < 0.05). The incidence of threatened miscarriage and miscarriage in group B and group C were significantly higher than those in group D at 3.3 and 2.7% (p < 0.05). The negative conversion rate of GBS in group A was significantly higher than that in group C (14.8 vs. 2.7%, p < 0.05). There was a difference in the incidence of fetal distress, premature delivery, premature rupture of the fetal membrane, chorioamnionitis, and neonatal infection between the continuously positive and negative pregnant women (p < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>GBS colonization rate was 14.7% in the second trimester of pregnancy. GBS infection can increase the risk of threatened miscarriage and miscarriage as well as the risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes. Early intervention with antibiotics can increase the negative conversion rate of GBS, reduce the incidence of threatened miscarriage and miscarriage, and ameliorate the adverse outcome of pregnancy. The effect of probiotic intervention on the negative conversion of GBS was insignificant.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13963,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of clinical pharmacology and therapeutics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of clinical pharmacology and therapeutics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5414/CP204790\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of clinical pharmacology and therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5414/CP204790","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:探讨妊娠中期B族链球菌(GBS)的定植率、感染与流产的关系及干预措施对妊娠结局的影响。材料与方法:228例妊娠14 ~ 28周的gbs阳性孕妇根据接受医疗干预的偏好分为3组:A组(抗生素组,n = 54)口服抗生素,B组(益生菌组,n = 96)口服益生菌,C组(非干预组,n = 78)不接受药物治疗。随机自愿选择gbs阴性孕妇300例作为对照组(D组)。比较四组流产相关情况的发生率、GBS阴性转换率。比较GBS持续阳性组和阴性组的围产期结局。结果:GBS定殖率为14.7%。A组先兆流产和流产的发生率分别为1.85和1.85%,低于B组的21.9%和6.3%,低于C组的33.3%和7.7%,差异均有统计学意义(p结论:妊娠中期GBS定植率为14.7%。GBS感染可增加先兆流产和流产的风险以及不良妊娠结局的风险。早期应用抗生素干预可提高GBS的阴性转换率,降低先兆流产和流产的发生率,改善妊娠不良结局。益生菌干预对GBS负转化的影响不显著。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Association of antibiotic treatment for second-trimester GBS with reduced miscarriage risk: Probiotic intervention shows no benefit.

Objective: To investigate the colonization rate of group B Streptococcus (GBS) during the second trimester of pregnancy, the correlation between GBS infection and miscarriage as well as the impact of intervention on pregnancy outcomes.

Materials and methods: 228 GBS-positive pregnant women at 14 - 28 weeks of gestation were divided into 3 groups according to their preferences to receive medical intervention: group A (antibiotic group, n = 54) received oral antibiotic, group B (probiotic group, n = 96) received oral probiotic, and group C (non-intervention group, n = 78) received no drug treatment. 300 GBS-negative pregnant women were selected voluntarily and randomly as the control group (group D). The incidence of miscarriage-related conditions, negative conversion rate of GBS were compared between the 4 groups. Perinatal outcomes were compared between the GBS persistent positive and negative groups.

Results: GBS colonization rate was 14.7%. The incidence of threatened miscarriage and miscarriage in group A were 1.85 and 1.85%, both of which were lower than those in group B at 21.9 and 6.3%, and group C at 33.3 and 7.7%, with all differences being statistically significant (p < 0.05). The incidence of threatened miscarriage and miscarriage in group B and group C were significantly higher than those in group D at 3.3 and 2.7% (p < 0.05). The negative conversion rate of GBS in group A was significantly higher than that in group C (14.8 vs. 2.7%, p < 0.05). There was a difference in the incidence of fetal distress, premature delivery, premature rupture of the fetal membrane, chorioamnionitis, and neonatal infection between the continuously positive and negative pregnant women (p < 0.05).

Conclusion: GBS colonization rate was 14.7% in the second trimester of pregnancy. GBS infection can increase the risk of threatened miscarriage and miscarriage as well as the risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes. Early intervention with antibiotics can increase the negative conversion rate of GBS, reduce the incidence of threatened miscarriage and miscarriage, and ameliorate the adverse outcome of pregnancy. The effect of probiotic intervention on the negative conversion of GBS was insignificant.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
12.50%
发文量
116
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Clinical Pharmacology and Therapeutics appears monthly and publishes manuscripts containing original material with emphasis on the following topics: Clinical trials, Pharmacoepidemiology - Pharmacovigilance, Pharmacodynamics, Drug disposition and Pharmacokinetics, Quality assurance, Pharmacogenetics, Biotechnological drugs such as cytokines and recombinant antibiotics. Case reports on adverse reactions are also of interest.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信